The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 210 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hilton shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 210 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 209 |
After analyzing 210 verified reviews, Hilton users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #52 0 reviews | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #56 1 reviews | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #40 1 reviews | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Hilton OnQ, developed by Hilton itself, promises a tailored experience for large-scale, franchise-style hotels, but its ratings and recent reviews paint a different picture. RoomRaccoon PMS, meanwhile, has amassed a significant number of recent reviews praising its ease of use and robust features. Which platform will better meet your hotel’s needs?
While Hilton’s proprietary solution is deeply integrated within Hilton properties, it struggles with outdated technology and limited support. RoomRaccoon, with more recent positive reviews, offers a modern, user-friendly, all-in-one system ideal for small to medium-sized hotels. Are you ready to see which suits your hotel best?
Hilton OnQ is designed specifically for Hilton’s extensive network of over 2,000 properties, aiming to streamline operations within that ecosystem. However, customers’ reviews indicate frequent issues with outdated technology, poor support, and limited flexibility, which can hamper day-to-day operations and guest satisfaction. Conversely, RoomRaccoon, with over 169 reviews in the past six months, has a high overall rating of 4.88/5, reflecting recent user satisfaction.
The key divergence is in their target users: Hilton OnQ is for large hotel chains within Hilton, focusing on massive-scale integrations, while RoomRaccoon aims at independent hoteliers and small operators seeking simplicity and automation. Do you want a system built for a corporate hotel chain or a flexible platform tailored for smaller properties?
End of the day, Hilton’s outdated tech and weak review scores suggest it’s less suited for independent hotels or those wanting modern, reliable tools. RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews validate its role as a fresh, adaptable alternative. Which will be more beneficial for your hotel’s growth and guest satisfaction?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, all-in-one platform that simplifies operations, automates guest communication, and boosts revenue, go with RoomRaccoon. Its user-friendly interface, high customer satisfaction, and extensive features—like channel management, booking engine, and yield management—make it ideal for small to mid-sized hotels.
If you operate a Hilton property or require a system deeply integrated into Hilton’s proprietary ecosystem, Hilton OnQ is the logical choice. But for independent hoteliers seeking flexibility, modernity, and proven recent support, RoomRaccoon’s higher ratings and active reviews clearly make it the better fit.
Hoteliers who prioritize ease of use, automation, and revenue growth should lean toward RoomRaccoon, while those committed to Hilton’s brand ecosystem might consider OnQ despite its shortcomings. Given the review data, which approach aligns with your hotel’s future?
RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating based on 169 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, straightforward interface and quick onboarding. Many reviewers mention how new staff adapt quickly, and how automation features save time on daily tasks.
Hilton OnQ, with a 1/5 rating and only one review, is consistently criticized for its outdated interface and difficult navigation. Hoteliers report spending hours troubleshooting issues and frustration with a system that feels like it was built in the 1990s.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers over 51 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, automatic night audit, guest CRM, and integrated payment processing. These features are designed to automate and optimize every aspect of your operations.
Hilton OnQ’s feature set is not publicly detailed, but it is known to be a proprietary PMS with limited customization, primarily focused on reservation management, billing, and basic guest services. It lacks the breadth and flexibility of RoomRaccoon’s modular features.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support is highly rated at 4.53/5, with recent reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful onboarding, and proactive assistance. Users appreciate the responsive support team that helps resolve bugs and integration issues efficiently.
Hilton OnQ’s support is overwhelmingly criticized, with reviews describing slow, unhelpful responses, and a lack of proactive service. The outdated technology and limited resources appear to impact support quality negatively.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon connects with 88 verified partners, including popular OTAs, payment gateways, and channel management tools, offering extensive flexibility. It also supports over 50 integrations, making it adaptable to various tech stacks.
Hilton OnQ’s integration options are limited, primarily designed for Hilton’s own ecosystem. Its reliance on outdated technology restricts third-party connectivity, which can hinder operational efficiency.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent review score of 4.88/5 and 169 reviews indicate high user satisfaction, especially among independent hotels, B&Bs, and small resorts. Hotels like Buff and Fellow and Vive La Vie Guesthouse report significant revenue increases and operational efficiencies.
Hilton OnQ’s rating is 0/5 based on a single review, with frustrations over outdated systems and poor support. No recent positive reviews are available, indicating limited current user confidence.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are not publicly available, but as a proprietary Hilton product, it’s likely included as part of franchise agreements or corporate contracts. Costs may vary significantly based on scale and integration needs.
RoomRaccoon charges a flat base fee of $1,000, plus monthly fees per property, with no implementation fee or trial. It offers transparent pricing, suitable for small and independent hotels.
Given the opacity of Hilton OnQ’s costs, the clear, predictable pricing of RoomRaccoon offers better value clarity for small operators.
Not ideal if your hotel is independent, small, or needs a modern, flexible PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel is part of a large hotel chain demanding proprietary systems or deep corporate integration.
The core difference is that Hilton OnQ is a brand-specific PMS designed for Hilton’s vast franchise network, but it suffers from outdated technology, limited support, and poor recent reviews. RoomRaccoon is an independent, cloud-based PMS praised for its ease of use, features, and recent customer satisfaction.
If your hotel is an independent operation or small property, RoomRaccoon’s modern, flexible platform provides tangible benefits like automation, better support, and revenue tools. Hilton OnQ may only make sense if you are part of the Hilton ecosystem and require integration at that level, despite its drawbacks.
For most hoteliers outside Hilton’s network, RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews and feature set offer a clear, more reliable path forward. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s growth plans and operational needs?
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Hilton OnQ and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hilton OnQ and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hilton OnQ offers 6 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 1.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hilton OnQ: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hilton has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor