The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 371 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hilton shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 371 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 370 |
After analyzing 371 verified reviews, Hilton users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #52 0 reviews | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #56 1 reviews | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #40 1 reviews | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing between Hilton OnQ and Stayntouch hinges on your hotel's specific needs, as both aim to streamline operations but serve different market segments and offer contrasting capabilities. Hilton OnQ is a proprietary in-house PMS used exclusively across Hilton properties, primarily catering to large hotel chains with standardized operations. In contrast, Stayntouch is a cloud-based platform praised for its ease of use and extensive third-party integrations, making it more adaptable for a wide variety of hotel types.
With Hilton OnQ’s limited review data and a near-zero rating, its efficacy and user satisfaction are not well established. Meanwhile, Stayntouch has over 300 reviews, a 4.56/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in reviews over the last six months, making it the more reliable choice for your hotel’s software evaluation.
Hilton OnQ is tailored to Hilton's global franchise structure, designed to support large-scale operations with a focus on reservation, billing, and basic front desk functions. It’s a proprietary system with limited external integration, which can constrain adaptability for independent or smaller hotels. Conversely, Stayntouch is cloud-native, offering a broad suite of features—including revenue management, housekeeping, and group handling—that cater to hotels seeking a flexible, scalable solution.
While Hilton OnQ’s core functionality is embedded within Hilton’s properties, it suffers from outdated technology and poor user satisfaction, as indicated by the single review and 1/5 ratings. Stayntouch’s modern interface and high review count—more recent and positive—make it a more attractive alternative for hotels that prioritize operational efficiency and guest experience.
Would your hotel benefit more from a proprietary, chain-specific system or a flexible, third-party platform? That’s the key question.
If your hotel operates as part of a large chain like Hilton, with standardized procedures and centralized control, Hilton OnQ might seem like the natural choice. However, given its poor review ratings and outdated tech, it’s unlikely to meet modern expectations for usability or support.
For hotels seeking a user-friendly, highly integrated, and scalable PMS, Stayntouch is the clear winner. It’s especially suited for boutique, independent, or multi-property hotels that want to improve staff productivity, guest personalization, and revenue streams. Its extensive third-party integrations and mobile capabilities make it the more future-proof option.
In essence, choose Hilton OnQ if you are a Hilton franchise or similar large chain with rigid standards, but for most independent or fast-growing hotels, Stayntouch offers a more versatile, proven solution.
Based on user ratings, Hilton OnQ scores a 1/5 for ease of use, with reviews citing an obsolete interface and significant technical issues that waste staff time. One reviewer even described it as “designed in the 90s,” which hampers staff productivity and guest service.
Stayntouch, on the other hand, boasts a 4.7/5 rating for ease of use, with reviewers regularly praising its intuitive screens, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Users note that new staff learn the system rapidly, and operational tasks are streamlined thanks to its visual design and real-time access.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ’s feature set appears limited, primarily focused on reservations, billing, and front desk operations. It lacks advanced modules like revenue management, online check-in, or detailed reporting, which are critical for modern hotel management.
Stayntouch offers over 49 unique features, including revenue management, automated night audit, guest messaging, digital registration, mobile check-in, group handling, and real-time reporting. Its feature breadth enables your team to manage operations more effectively and provide a seamless guest experience.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ’s support ratings are nearly nonexistent, with one review giving it a 1/5, citing endless tech support issues and outdated infrastructure. This suggests support may be insufficient or unresponsive, especially for independent hotels.
Stayntouch’s support is rated 4.68/5, with reviews highlighting the team’s friendliness, thorough onboarding, and quick issue resolution. Guests appreciate the ongoing assistance, which translates into smoother operations and less downtime.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ has only six verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with other software solutions like revenue management, online booking, or guest engagement tools. Its integrations are narrow and mostly limited to Hilton’s internal systems.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and Impulsify. Its open API structure allows seamless connection across a broad ecosystem, enabling your hotel to tailor technology integrations to your needs.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Given the limited review data for Hilton OnQ, its ratings are essentially unverified, and its overall rating is 0/5. The single review is negative, citing obsolete technology and support issues.
Conversely, Stayntouch has a 4.56/5 rating based on 317 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, support, and efficiency. The platform maintains a 94% likelihood to recommend among recent reviewers, indicating high satisfaction across various hotel types.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely because it’s a proprietary system included as part of Hilton’s franchise package. External hotels or independent operators cannot purchase or license it separately.
Stayntouch charges a base price of $800, with no free tier, monthly flat fee, or implementation cost publicly disclosed. Pricing may vary depending on hotel size and specific needs, but it is a clear, transparent model compared to Hilton’s internal setup.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Hilton OnQ is a proprietary, chain-specific PMS with outdated technology and limited flexibility, while Stayntouch is a modern, cloud-based platform with an expansive feature set and extensive integrations.
If your hotel is part of Hilton or a similar large chain with standardized needs, Hilton OnQ might be suitable, but its poor reviews and outdated infrastructure raise concerns. For most other hotels—especially independent or growing properties—Stayntouch’s ease of use, scalability, and proven customer satisfaction make it the clear choice.
Choose Hilton OnQ only if your operations are strictly tied to Hilton’s ecosystem; otherwise, Stayntouch offers a superior, more adaptable solution for the future of your hotel.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Hilton OnQ and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hilton OnQ and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hilton OnQ offers 6 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 1.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hilton OnQ: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hilton has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor