The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 375 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hilton shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 375 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 374 |
After analyzing 375 verified reviews, Hilton users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight smooth transition and training, user experience and interface, housekeeping and operational efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Smooth Transition and Training
▾
|
|
|
+
User Experience and Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping and Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Rate Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reports and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Limited Group and Invoice Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #52 0 reviews | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #56 1 reviews | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #40 1 reviews | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing between Hilton OnQ and Stayntouch hinges on your hotel's specific needs, as both aim to streamline operations but serve different market segments and offer contrasting capabilities. Hilton OnQ is a proprietary in-house PMS used exclusively across Hilton properties, primarily catering to large hotel chains with standardized operations. In contrast, Stayntouch is a cloud-based platform praised for its ease of use and extensive third-party integrations, making it more adaptable for a wide variety of hotel types.
With Hilton OnQ’s limited review data and a near-zero rating, its efficacy and user satisfaction are not well established. Meanwhile, Stayntouch has over 300 reviews, a 4.56/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in reviews over the last six months, making it the more reliable choice for your hotel’s software evaluation.
Hilton OnQ is tailored to Hilton's global franchise structure, designed to support large-scale operations with a focus on reservation, billing, and basic front desk functions. It’s a proprietary system with limited external integration, which can constrain adaptability for independent or smaller hotels. Conversely, Stayntouch is cloud-native, offering a broad suite of features—including revenue management, housekeeping, and group handling—that cater to hotels seeking a flexible, scalable solution.
While Hilton OnQ’s core functionality is embedded within Hilton’s properties, it suffers from outdated technology and poor user satisfaction, as indicated by the single review and 1/5 ratings. Stayntouch’s modern interface and high review count—more recent and positive—make it a more attractive alternative for hotels that prioritize operational efficiency and guest experience.
Would your hotel benefit more from a proprietary, chain-specific system or a flexible, third-party platform? That’s the key question.
If your hotel operates as part of a large chain like Hilton, with standardized procedures and centralized control, Hilton OnQ might seem like the natural choice. However, given its poor review ratings and outdated tech, it’s unlikely to meet modern expectations for usability or support.
For hotels seeking a user-friendly, highly integrated, and scalable PMS, Stayntouch is the clear winner. It’s especially suited for boutique, independent, or multi-property hotels that want to improve staff productivity, guest personalization, and revenue streams. Its extensive third-party integrations and mobile capabilities make it the more future-proof option.
In essence, choose Hilton OnQ if you are a Hilton franchise or similar large chain with rigid standards, but for most independent or fast-growing hotels, Stayntouch offers a more versatile, proven solution.
Based on user ratings, Hilton OnQ scores a 1/5 for ease of use, with reviews citing an obsolete interface and significant technical issues that waste staff time. One reviewer even described it as “designed in the 90s,” which hampers staff productivity and guest service.
Stayntouch, on the other hand, boasts a 4.7/5 rating for ease of use, with reviewers regularly praising its intuitive screens, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Users note that new staff learn the system rapidly, and operational tasks are streamlined thanks to its visual design and real-time access.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ’s feature set appears limited, primarily focused on reservations, billing, and front desk operations. It lacks advanced modules like revenue management, online check-in, or detailed reporting, which are critical for modern hotel management.
Stayntouch offers over 49 unique features, including revenue management, automated night audit, guest messaging, digital registration, mobile check-in, group handling, and real-time reporting. Its feature breadth enables your team to manage operations more effectively and provide a seamless guest experience.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ’s support ratings are nearly nonexistent, with one review giving it a 1/5, citing endless tech support issues and outdated infrastructure. This suggests support may be insufficient or unresponsive, especially for independent hotels.
Stayntouch’s support is rated 4.68/5, with reviews highlighting the team’s friendliness, thorough onboarding, and quick issue resolution. Guests appreciate the ongoing assistance, which translates into smoother operations and less downtime.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ has only six verified partners, limiting its ability to connect with other software solutions like revenue management, online booking, or guest engagement tools. Its integrations are narrow and mostly limited to Hilton’s internal systems.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and Impulsify. Its open API structure allows seamless connection across a broad ecosystem, enabling your hotel to tailor technology integrations to your needs.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Given the limited review data for Hilton OnQ, its ratings are essentially unverified, and its overall rating is 0/5. The single review is negative, citing obsolete technology and support issues.
Conversely, Stayntouch has a 4.56/5 rating based on 317 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, support, and efficiency. The platform maintains a 94% likelihood to recommend among recent reviewers, indicating high satisfaction across various hotel types.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely because it’s a proprietary system included as part of Hilton’s franchise package. External hotels or independent operators cannot purchase or license it separately.
Stayntouch charges a base price of $800, with no free tier, monthly flat fee, or implementation cost publicly disclosed. Pricing may vary depending on hotel size and specific needs, but it is a clear, transparent model compared to Hilton’s internal setup.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Hilton OnQ is a proprietary, chain-specific PMS with outdated technology and limited flexibility, while Stayntouch is a modern, cloud-based platform with an expansive feature set and extensive integrations.
If your hotel is part of Hilton or a similar large chain with standardized needs, Hilton OnQ might be suitable, but its poor reviews and outdated infrastructure raise concerns. For most other hotels—especially independent or growing properties—Stayntouch’s ease of use, scalability, and proven customer satisfaction make it the clear choice.
Choose Hilton OnQ only if your operations are strictly tied to Hilton’s ecosystem; otherwise, Stayntouch offers a superior, more adaptable solution for the future of your hotel.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistent... Stayntouch receives high praise for its seamless transition and training processes, greatly aided by trainers like David and Julia, who are consistently mentioned for their support and comprehensive guidance. Many reviews highlight the ease of moving from previous systems, an aspect noted particularly for its stress-reduction during onboarding.
The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for st... The software is largely favored for its intuitive and user-friendly design, supporting efficient training and ease of user adoption, especially for staff with varying technical proficiencies. This contributes significantly to positive front-desk and operational performances.
The housekeeping management features of Stayntouch are frequently highlighted for simplifying room assignments and tracking housekeeping status. This... The housekeeping management features of Stayntouch are frequently highlighted for simplifying room assignments and tracking housekeeping status. This boosts operational efficiency by providing real-time updates that enhance day-to-day workflow.
Where hoteliers push back
While reporting features are appreciated for being comprehensive and aiding in operational oversight, several reviews indicate room for improvement in... While reporting features are appreciated for being comprehensive and aiding in operational oversight, several reviews indicate room for improvement in terms of report customizability and clarity. Challenges in generating detailed reports have been a noted setback for some users.
Some reviews highlight difficulties in managing group bookings and invoicing, noting that certain processes could be more streamlined and intuitive. I... Some reviews highlight difficulties in managing group bookings and invoicing, noting that certain processes could be more streamlined and intuitive. Issues with shifting client accounts and historical data access suggest there's room for feature expansion.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hilton OnQ and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hilton OnQ offers 6 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 193. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 1.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hilton OnQ: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hilton has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property