The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 886 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acigrup shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 886 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 886 |
After analyzing 886 verified reviews, Acigrup users most value its , while Mews users highlight customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, onboarding and support experience. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acigrup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing Complexity and Reporting Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a tool that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and integrates smoothly with your existing tech stack. Both Acigrup’s Hospitality Software and Mews PMS address core hotel management challenges, but their differences are significant. Acigrup’s platform offers no recent reviews or clear user feedback, raising questions about its current relevance, whereas Mews boasts over 750 recent reviews with high praise. Are you ready to invest in a proven, well-supported solution?
Acigrup’s Hospitality Software aims to streamline operations with a broad suite of functionalities, yet it has no verified customer reviews or recent feedback, making its effectiveness uncertain. In contrast, Mews offers a cloud-native, highly reviewed PMS with over 750 recent reviews, a high overall rating of 4.62/5, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong user satisfaction.
While Acigrup markets itself as a comprehensive hospitality platform, the lack of recent validation leaves its current performance and support quality in question. Mews, on the other hand, has a proven track record of delivering operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, backed by current, positive user feedback. Would you prefer to rely on an unverified platform or an industry leader with demonstrable results?
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable cloud-based PMS with extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews. Its over 336 verified integrations and marketplace of over 1,000 apps make it ideal for hotels seeking flexibility and modernization.
If your priority is a system with a broad feature set but no recent validation or reviews, Acigrup may seem appealing. However, given the absence of recent feedback and user validation, Mews is the safer choice for hotels that want proven technology, ongoing support, and a platform trusted by thousands of users.
Mews consistently receives high marks for ease of use, with a 4.7/5 rating and recent reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface. Users highlight quick onboarding, straightforward workflows, and minimal staff training, with many noting that staff adoption is smooth.
Acigrup, on the other hand, has no published usability ratings or recent reviews, leaving its user experience uncertain. Without verified user feedback, you risk investing in a system whose ease of use is unproven. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite of 59 features, including a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, integrated POS, guest messaging, and automated workflows—many of which are absent in Acigrup’s platform. Its features target operational automation, revenue optimization, and guest engagement, providing a comprehensive toolkit.
Acigrup provides no verified features or recent updates, which raises concerns about its capability to meet modern hospitality demands. With Mews’ proven feature richness and frequent updates, it clearly leads in this comparison. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support team is highly rated at 4.27/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and proactive assistance. Customers mention that onboarding support and ongoing help are reliable, with some reviews specifically highlighting quick bug resolution and continuous improvements.
Acigrup has no available recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given the importance of dependable assistance in hotel operations, Mews’s established support makes it the safer investment. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, along with a marketplace of over 1,000 apps. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize and expand their management solutions easily.
Acigrup lacks any verified partner integrations, which limits its adaptability and scalability. For hotels looking to grow and incorporate new tech, Mews’s rich integration environment is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 recent reviews, primarily positive, Mews enjoys a 4.62/5 rating and a 93% likelihood of recommendation across diverse property types, from boutique hotels to hostels. Hoteliers frequently praise its user-friendly design, automation, and support.
Acigrup’s absence of recent reviews or ratings means it cannot be confidently recommended based on user feedback. Mews’s current, high-rated user experience makes it the clear leader for hoteliers seeking validation and proven performance. Edge: Mews.
Acigrup’s pricing is undisclosed, suggesting a potentially customized quote without transparency. Mews’s base price starts at $900 per month, with no implementation fees or trial options, offering clear, predictable costs.
The lack of transparency around Acigrup’s pricing makes it difficult to compare value directly. Mews’s transparent pricing, combined with its proven ROI, provides clarity and confidence for hotel budgets.
Mews is a cloud-based, feature-rich PMS with proven success, extensive integrations, and highly recent positive reviews. Its broad support network and innovation focus make it suitable for modern hotels seeking growth and efficiency.
Acigrup’s platform appears to be a less validated, possibly outdated option, with no recent reviews or clear customer feedback. Unless your hotel specifically requires a basic or legacy system, Mews should be your choice.
In summary, if you want a trusted system with recent validation and a track record of high hotelier satisfaction, Mews is the clear winner. Acigrup remains an unverified alternative with uncertain support, limited features, and no recent user feedback—better to proceed with caution or opt for the proven leader.
According to HTR's product database, Hospitality Software and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial s... The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial setup efficiency. The support team's responsiveness has improved over time, enhancing problem resolution and user satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could pr... While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could provide better insights and flexibility for users managing financial operations.
Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynami... Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynamic pricing tools and advanced analytics, especially in multi-property operations.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hospitality Software and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hospitality Software offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hospitality Software: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acigrup has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor