The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acigrup shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Acigrup users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acigrup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing between Acigrup Hospitality Software and Preno hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge in features, user experience, and market presence. Acigrup offers a broad, all-encompassing platform but lacks current user reviews and verified integrations. Preno, meanwhile, boasts a strong reputation with over 144 recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and extensive integrations—making it a compelling choice for most hoteliers.
Are you looking for a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with proven track record, or a flexible, feature-rich platform that’s already proven to improve operational efficiency? Let’s explore.
Acigrup claims to provide a broad hospitality platform that manages reservations, billing, housekeeping, and maintenance. However, it does not currently have any verified integrations or reviews in the last six months, making its real-world performance and support less transparent.
Preno, with 144 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, is clearly favored among hoteliers. It excels in ease of use, customer support, and integration capabilities, which are crucial for day-to-day operations.
While Acigrup may aim to serve a wide market, the lack of recent reviews and verified integrations limits your confidence in its current functionality. Conversely, Preno’s active user base and positive feedback suggest it’s a more reliable and tested solution. Are you prepared to take a gamble on an unreviewed platform, or do you prefer a product with proven results?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, highly-rated PMS with integrations and features that support multi-property management and revenue optimization, go with Preno. Its extensive review base, high satisfaction scores, and 17 verified integrations—including Xero, SiteMinder, and TrustYou—make it a solid choice.
If your team requires a broad, customizable platform that offers a wide array of features beyond typical PMS functions and you’re comfortable with unverified vendors, Acigrup might appeal. However, the absence of recent reviews or verified integrations makes this a risky choice for most hotels.
For hoteliers prioritizing customer support, ease of use, and proven operational improvements, Preno clearly stands out. If your hotel is more niche and able to manage potential uncertainties, Acigrup could be considered—but with caution.
Preno scores 4.78/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and support team. Users highlight its simple layout, quick onboarding, and helpful support, including responsive chat functions and dedicated onboarding assistance.
Acigrup, on the other hand, has a zero rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback available. This absence makes it impossible to evaluate its UI/UX or onboarding experience confidently.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 distinct features, including payment processing, central guest profiles, a booking engine, channel management, revenue management, automated night audits, and a mobile app. Many of these are tailored to streamline daily hotel operations and improve revenue growth.
Acigrup, with zero verified features, appears to lack the comprehensive suite that Preno provides. Its platform’s capabilities remain unconfirmed, and the absence of detailed feature lists or reviews makes it difficult to compare.
Edge: Preno.
Preno earns a 4.8/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing the responsiveness and helpfulness of its support team. Users describe Preno’s support as “brilliant,” with prompt assistance during onboarding and ongoing inquiries.
Acigrup, with a zero support rating and no recent reviews, provides no verifiable information regarding its customer service. This lack of data raises questions about the quality and responsiveness of its support.
Edge: Preno.
Preno boasts 17 verified integrations, including popular tools like Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate—covering accounting, channel management, guest feedback, and revenue tools. This broad integration ecosystem facilitates smoother operations and better data flow.
Acigrup, with no verified partners, offers no assurance of integration capabilities. Its platform’s ability to connect with essential third-party tools remains unverified, which could hinder operational efficiency.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews, predominantly from small to mid-sized hotels, boutique properties, and motels. Hoteliers praise its user-friendliness, customer support, and the tangible impact on operational efficiency.
Acigrup’s lack of recent reviews and ratings makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction accurately. The absence of feedback suggests it is not widely adopted or tested in current markets.
Edge: Preno.
Acigrup’s pricing details are unavailable publicly, with no information on trial options, monthly rates, or implementation fees. This opacity complicates budget planning and comparison.
Preno charges a starting price of $800 for its platform, with no free tier or trial period, but includes a comprehensive suite of features and integrations.
If transparent pricing is vital to your decision, Preno’s clear structure adds confidence.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market presence and proven user satisfaction. Preno offers a well-rated, integrated, and actively supported platform, while Acigrup remains unreviewed and unverified in recent industry feedback.
If your hotel values reliability, ease of use, and proven support, Preno is the clear choice. It’s especially advantageous for properties that need strong integrations and a proven track record of improving operations.
Choose Acigrup only if you have the resources to handle an untested system and are willing to accept the risk of limited support and unverified capabilities. Its lack of recent reviews and integrations puts it at a significant disadvantage in today’s competitive hotel software landscape.
In summary: For most hoteliers, especially those seeking a trusted, well-supported property management solution with extensive integrations, Preno ranks as the superior system. Its high review count and recent positive feedback demonstrate its value and reliability in the current market.
According to HTR's product database, Hospitality Software and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hospitality Software and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hospitality Software offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hospitality Software: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acigrup has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor