The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acigrup shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Acigrup users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acigrup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs reliable core functions like reservations, check-ins, billing, and reporting. Product A, Hotel Software by Acigrup, claims to offer a comprehensive solution, but it lacks recent reviews, customer feedback, and visible user ratings. Preno by Preno, on the other hand, has a strong reputation, with 144 reviews, recent user feedback, and a high overall rating. Does this make Preno the more trustworthy choice?
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven user satisfaction or an unverified platform with limited data. While Acigrup aims to be an all-in-one solution, Preno’s recent reviews show consistent positive experiences and a higher likelihood to recommend. Which product will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations but diverge significantly in user feedback and market presence. Acigrup’s property management system claims to centralize functions like reservations, housekeeping, and billing, yet it has zero reviews and no recent customer data, making its reliability uncertain. Preno, with over 140 reviews and a 4.73/5 rating, demonstrates a proven track record of customer satisfaction, especially in ease of use, support, and value.
Preno’s reviews highlight its simplicity, integration capabilities, and support quality, whereas Acigrup’s lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance. So, are you willing to choose an untested platform, or do recent user experiences guide you toward Preno?
If your hotel needs an established, well-rated system that is easy for staff to adopt, Preno clearly stands out. It has a proven positive reputation among hotels of various sizes, including boutique hotels and motels, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and extensive features. Acigrup’s offerings are unverified, with no recent reviews or user ratings, making it difficult to assess whether it truly meets hotel management demands.
For hotels seeking proven support, frequent updates, and a product that many users recommend, Preno is the safer, more reliable option. Conversely, if your hotel is exploring new solutions and willing to risk unreviewed tech, Acigrup might be on your radar — but the lack of recent data diminishes confidence.
Preno is highly rated for ease of use, with a 4.78/5 rating based on 144 reviews. Users find its interface intuitive and straightforward, and onboarding is generally smooth, with many mentioning support staff as responsive and helpful. Acigrup, with a 0/5 rating and no reviews, offers no data to evaluate its usability, which is a significant concern for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly system.
The positive feedback for Preno’s interface and support indicates that your team will likely adopt it quickly, saving time and reducing frustration. Without user feedback, Acigrup’s ease of use remains uncertain.
Edge: Preno.
Preno boasts 30 unique features, including payment processing, a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, and a mobile app — features that Acigrup does not list or appear to offer. Acigrup’s limited information and zero featured capabilities mean it can’t compete on feature depth or flexibility.
Preno’s extensive feature set supports multi-channel booking, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and more, offering your hotel comprehensive operational control. Acigrup’s lack of listed features makes it a less attractive option for hotels seeking advanced capabilities.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s customer support rating is 4.8/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and supportive staff. Users say support is quick to help with onboarding and troubleshooting, often praising Preno’s team for their proactive approach. Acigrup’s support ratings are unavailable, and there are no recent reviews to gauge its responsiveness or quality.
Given the high support ratings and recent positive feedback, Preno is more likely to assist your team effectively when needed. Acigrup’s support quality remains unverified, adding risk to your decision.
Edge: Preno.
Preno has 17 verified integrations, including popular tools like Xero, SiteMinder, Revinate, and TrustYou, streamlining connections with accounting, channel management, and reputation systems. Acigrup has no listed verified partners or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with essential hotel tools.
This extensive integration network means Preno can adapt to your existing tech stack, reducing manual work and errors. Acigrup’s lack of integrations poses a challenge for hotels reliant on a connected system.
Edge: Preno.
Since Acigrup has no reviews, it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Preno, with 144 recent reviews, enjoys a 4.73/5 overall rating, and a 9.53/5 NPS score, indicating high customer satisfaction. Hotels of all segments, including boutique hotels and motels, consistently praise Preno for its ease of use, support, and value.
Property types that value customer support and functionality tend to rate Preno higher, influencing its reputation positively. With no recent data on Acigrup, the clear choice is Preno based on current user ratings.
Edge: Preno.
Acigrup’s pricing information is unavailable, making it difficult to evaluate value. Preno costs $800 monthly, with no mention of setup fees or flexible pricing models, which some users find limited.
While Preno’s pricing appears straightforward, the value depends on your hotel’s size and needs. The absence of transparent pricing for Acigrup makes it harder to compare cost-effectiveness.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on proven support, extensive features, or integration with other systems.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly customizable or enterprise-scale management beyond Preno’s current scope.
Preno offers a straightforward, well-reviewed property management system with a wide feature set, proven customer support, and extensive integrations that meet the needs of most hotels. Its recent reviews and high ratings give it an edge over Acigrup, which lacks recent user feedback, reviews, and verified features.
If your hotel values reliability, ease of use, and proven performance, Preno is the clear choice. Acigrup might be worth exploring if you’re open to testing an unreviewed platform, but caution is advised given the absence of recent customer data.
In summary, choosing Preno means selecting a trusted, well-supported system that can grow with your hotel’s needs. Acigrup’s unverified status makes it a riskier option unless your hotel is prepared to evaluate and potentially troubleshoot a less established platform.
According to HTR's product database, Hotel Software and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hotel Software and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hotel Software offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hotel Software: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acigrup has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor