The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
hotelcube shines , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, hotelcube users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both hotelcube and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different segments and come with distinct strengths. While hotelcube offers a comprehensive, customizable platform rooted in traditional hospitality management, RoomRaccoon focuses on delivering an easy-to-use, all-in-one solution ideal for small and independent hotels.
What do you need most — a robust, enterprise-ready system or a user-friendly platform that simplifies daily tasks? Let’s compare both to help you make an informed decision.
hotelcube and RoomRaccoon are designed to address hotel management challenges, but they diverge sharply in scope and user base. hotelcube offers a flexible, modular PMS with proprietary modules like Spa & Wellness, Guest Communication, and on-premise support, suited for larger or more complex properties. Conversely, RoomRaccoon is an all-in-one, cloud-based platform with features like integrated booking engine, channel manager, and revenue tools, tailored for small hotels and independents.
Recently, RoomRaccoon has accumulated more reviews (169 vs. hotelcube’s zero) and higher ratings—4.88/5 overall and a 9.09/10 NPS—making it a more trusted choice among hoteliers. This data reflects a broader and more current user base, indicating stronger market presence and customer satisfaction.
Are you looking for a deeply customizable system or a straightforward, user-friendly experience? The answer will guide your choice.
If your hotel needs a scalable, cloud-based PMS with a wide array of features that integrate reservations, channel management, and revenue optimization, go with RoomRaccoon. Its platform is particularly suitable for small, independent hotels seeking simplicity without sacrificing functionality.
If, instead, your hotel requires a modular system with specialized modules like Spa & Wellness, or on-premise deployment, hotelcube might be a better fit. Its suite offers tailored solutions for larger properties or those with complex, multi-departmental operations. However, given RoomRaccoon’s stronger recent reviews, it remains the more reliable choice for most small to mid-sized hotels.
RoomRaccoon significantly outperforms hotelcube in usability, with a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating compared to hotelcube’s 0/5. Hoteliers praise RoomRaccoon’s intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal training time, making staff adoption straightforward. Many reviews highlight how easy it is to manage bookings, automate guest communication, and generate reports without technical expertise.
hotelcube’s interface and onboarding process are not well-rated or documented, suggesting a steep learning curve and potentially higher training requirements. The platform’s complexity may slow down staff adoption, especially for smaller teams.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers a broad suite of 32 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, guest profiles, CRS, ancillary revenue tracking, PMS connectivity, analytics dashboard, multi-currency support, inventory management, and online checkout. Many of these features are built-in, with real-time updates and automation, providing a comprehensive all-in-one solution.
hotelcube has only four features exclusive to its platform: Spa & Wellness Module, Guest Communication (SMS Messaging), Online 24/7 support, and On-premise deployment. While these are valuable for specific use cases, they do not match the breadth and integration of RoomRaccoon’s capabilities.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon enjoys a strong reputation for customer support, rated 4.53/5, with reviews praising responsiveness and helpfulness. Users report that the support team is proactive, and onboarding is smooth, often mentioning that issues are resolved quickly.
hotelcube, on the other hand, receives no recent reviews or ratings, which raises questions about its current support quality. The lack of recent customer feedback suggests limited or less accessible support, making RoomRaccoon the safer bet for reliable assistance.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment systems, and revenue management tools. Shared integrations with platforms like SiteMinder, WuBook, and Oaky streamline operations and enhance connectivity.
hotelcube supports 24 verified partners, including some key hotel tech providers, but its smaller ecosystem limits flexibility. The broader integration network of RoomRaccoon offers greater operational versatility and future-proofing.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
With over 169 recent reviews, RoomRaccoon scores an impressive 4.88/5, reflecting widespread satisfaction among small hotel operators. Hoteliers frequently cite ease of use, automation, and revenue improvements as key benefits.
hotelcube has no recent reviews or ratings, and thus, its user satisfaction cannot be reliably gauged. Based on available data, RoomRaccoon’s user experience and review scores clearly make it the more favored option.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
hotelcube’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no trial or freemium options, which could be steep for small hotels or boutique properties. RoomRaccoon’s base price is $1,000 per month, also without free tiers, but it includes more features and recent positive reviews.
Given the more comprehensive feature set and recent customer satisfaction, RoomRaccoon offers better perceived value despite higher initial pricing, especially considering its extensive integrations and support.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, requires rapid onboarding, or prefers a cloud-based system for ease of use.
Not ideal if you require custom modules like Spa & Wellness or need a system deployed on-premise for specific security reasons.
The core difference is that hotelcube offers a more modular, customizable solution suited for larger or more complex properties, while RoomRaccoon’s strength lies in its simplicity, ease of use, and integrated features. If you prioritize a quick setup, user-friendly interface, and proven customer satisfaction, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice.
Choose hotelcube if your hotel demands specialized modules, on-premise deployment, or highly tailored solutions, and your team is prepared for a steeper learning curve. For most small and independent hotels, RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews, extensive feature set, and support quality make it the smarter investment today.
This detailed comparison should help you identify which platform aligns with your hotel’s operational needs, budget, and growth plans. Remember, the stronger recent user feedback and higher overall ratings favor RoomRaccoon as the more reliable, well-regarded PMS choice currently available.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, HOTELCUBE PMS and RoomRaccoon PMS share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HOTELCUBE PMS and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HOTELCUBE PMS offers 24 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HOTELCUBE PMS: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. hotelcube has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor