The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 358 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Flexkeeping shines when it comes to integration with property management systems (pms) — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Inventory Trend Analysis.
hub OS shines when it comes to user interface and ease of use — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 358 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 164 | 194 |
After analyzing 358 verified reviews, Flexkeeping users most value its integration with property management systems (pms), automation of task assignments, operational efficiency, while hub OS users highlight user interface and ease of use, customization and adaptability, maintenance module. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration with Property Management Systems (PMS)
▾
|
+
User Interface and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Automation of Task Assignments
▾
|
+
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Maintenance Module
▾
|
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
+
Technical Support and Customer Service
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System Reliability
▾
|
−
Integration with Existing Systems
▾
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Maintenance Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 22 reviews | #3 14 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 85 reviews | #4 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | #2 64 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 23 reviews | #6 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 76 reviews | #3 87 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 56 reviews | #4 68 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 45 reviews | #4 80 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 25 reviews | #6 11 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 12 reviews | #7 10 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 125 reviews | #2 153 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #5 1 reviews | #4 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #3 6 reviews |
When choosing maintenance management software, your hotel needs a solution that boosts operational efficiency, streamlines communication, and reduces costs. Both Flexkeeping Maintenance Suite and hub OS Maintenance aim to address these issues, but they approach the challenge differently. Flexkeeping is known for its high user ratings, recent reviews, and extensive client base, making it a strong contender. Conversely, hub OS offers a broader set of features and integration options but has fewer recent reviews. Which product truly fits your hotel's needs?
Flexkeeping and hub OS are both designed to optimize hotel maintenance and operational workflows, but they serve slightly different purposes. Flexkeeping’s cloud-based platform emphasizes automating cleaning schemas, task assignments, and communication, making it ideal for hotels seeking to improve housekeeping and maintenance coordination. On the other hand, hub OS provides a comprehensive maintenance solution with real-time fault notifications, asset management, and legal inspection modules. Do you prioritize ease of use or feature depth?
While Flexkeeping is praised for its straightforward interface and quick onboarding, hub OS's integrations and asset tracking features appeal to larger or more complex operations. Flexkeeping’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.98/5 based on 139 reviews) signal a well-received product, especially among mid-sized and large hotels. In comparison, hub OS has a solid 4.84/5 with 175 reviews, but none in the last six months, making its data less current. Which timeline and review recency matter more to your decision?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly platform focused on automating cleaning, streamlining communication, and boosting guest satisfaction, Flexkeeping is the clear choice. Its features like inventory trend analysis and rapid implementation, combined with a 97% likelihood of recommendation, make it a suitable fit for hotels aiming for quick results and high staff adoption.
If your property requires a more extensive maintenance system with asset management, legal compliance, and offline mobile capabilities, hub OS might be better. Its customizable checklists, QR code asset identification, and detailed reporting serve clients with complex maintenance workflows and multi-department coordination. For smaller hotels or those seeking rapid deployment, Flexkeeping’s simplicity is an advantage; for larger or more technically complex operations, hub OS’s feature set may justify its broader scope.
Flexkeeping’s intuitive, mobile-friendly interface scores a 4.9/5, and users praise its quick onboarding and minimal training needs. Many reviews highlight how staff find the platform straightforward, with features that are easy to navigate, reducing operational disruption.
In contrast, hub OS also scores high at 4.84/5 but receives some criticism for its performance speed and interface complexity. Some users mention that system crashes and slow updates impact usability, especially on older devices. Overall, Flexkeeping’s consistent recent reviews and high ratings suggest it is easier for your team to adopt quickly. Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping offers unique features like Inventory Trend Analysis, giving you insights into stock levels and usage patterns—an essential tool for cost control. It also specializes in automating complex cleaning schemas and offers a modular, cloud-based app tailored to hotel operations, with 8 shared features with hub OS.
hub OS provides distinctive functionalities like CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting, legal inspection management, and QR code asset identification, totaling 9 exclusive features. It also excels in managing preventive maintenance schedules via customizable checklists and offline mobile operation. While both products are feature-rich, Flexkeeping’s niche focus on cleaning and operational analytics gives it an edge for hotels prioritizing guest-facing operational efficiency.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping’s reviews consistently praise its support, with a 4.86/5 rating and comments like “excellent support and service in time,” highlighting responsiveness and reliability. Several clients mention that Flexkeeping’s support team is proactive in continuous improvement, making onboarding and troubleshooting easier.
hub OS also has strong support, rated at 4.78/5, with comments emphasizing its responsive service and ease of managing faults. However, some reviews point to occasional slow system updates and interface crashes, which can hinder support experiences. Based on recent reviews and ratings, Flexkeeping’s support slightly outperforms. Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping integrates with 24 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like RMS, Oracle Hospitality, and Cloudbeds. Its broad partner network facilitates smooth data sharing and operational workflows.
hub OS connects with 23 verified partners, sharing many common integrations such as Mews, Opera, and Infor, but offers additional integrations like HiJiffy and Quinta. While both are well-connected, Flexkeeping’s slightly larger partner ecosystem provides more flexibility for diverse hotel systems.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping’s recent reviews and 4.98/5 rating from 139 reviewers underscore its strong hotel satisfaction, especially among large resorts and independent hotels. Hotels like the Strawberry Hotels group and Hotel Oderberger Berlin highlight how Flexkeeping increased productivity, reduced admin hours, and improved guest satisfaction.
hub OS’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.84/5 from 175 reviews, with praise for its reliability and detailed reporting. However, recent feedback indicates slower performance and interface issues, which can impact user experience. Overall, Flexkeeping’s recent reviews suggest higher hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping charges a flat rate of $300/month without a trial or implementation fees, offering predictable budgeting and clear ROI. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for hotels of different sizes seeking an affordable solution.
Pricing for hub OS is not publicly disclosed, but it is implied to be a customized quote based on features and hotel size. Its broader feature set and integration options might justify higher costs, but the lack of transparent pricing makes direct comparison difficult.
Flexkeeping is the more reviewed and consistently praised product, especially for its ease of use, recent support quality, and hotel-centric features. Its focus on operational automation and analytics provides measurable benefits in staff efficiency and guest satisfaction.
hub OS offers a comprehensive maintenance platform with asset management, legal compliance, and offline capabilities, suited for hotels with complex, multi-department needs. However, its fewer recent reviews and performance concerns suggest it’s better for tech-savvy properties with extensive operational requirements.
If your hotel values proven user satisfaction, quick deployment, and robust support, choose Flexkeeping. For larger, more complex operations prioritizing detailed asset management and customization, hub OS remains a solid option.
Hotel Maintenance Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite and hub OS Maintenance share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CapEX Budgeting & Forecasting | ||
| Inventory Trend Analysis |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Flexkeeping completely transformed our workflow which led to an 80% reduction in the workload, simplifying processes and massively lowering our stress levels!"
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Every comment a guest makes gets immediately communicated throughout the whole hotel. Since it’s such a transparent platform, staff can react instantly, and management can stay inf..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The software integrates seamlessly with various property management systems, which is highlighted as a significant advantage. This integration allows... The software integrates seamlessly with various property management systems, which is highlighted as a significant advantage. This integration allows for streamlined operations and enhanced efficiency. However, there are mentions of occasional downtime, which users hope will be resolved through the company's merger.
Users frequently praise Flexkeeping for simplifying housekeeping and maintenance tasks through automation. It saves several hours daily by efficiently... Users frequently praise Flexkeeping for simplifying housekeeping and maintenance tasks through automation. It saves several hours daily by efficiently automating and assigning tasks, thereby improving staff productivity and reducing operational expenses.
Flexkeeping significantly enhances operational efficiency by reducing the time spent on administrative tasks and improving the coordination of mainten... Flexkeeping significantly enhances operational efficiency by reducing the time spent on administrative tasks and improving the coordination of maintenance workflows. This is particularly beneficial in streamlining tasks and freeing up time for staff to focus on other critical areas.
Where hoteliers push back
While the system is generally praised for its functionality, some users have experienced brief interruptions due to integration issues. Increased reli... While the system is generally praised for its functionality, some users have experienced brief interruptions due to integration issues. Increased reliability is anticipated following the company's recent merger announcements, which users expect will resolve these sporadic issues.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hub OS's intuitive user interface is a recurring theme in reviews, making it easy for staff to adopt and use the software effectively. This ease of us... Hub OS's intuitive user interface is a recurring theme in reviews, making it easy for staff to adopt and use the software effectively. This ease of use helps reduce training time and improves overall efficiency.
Users love the ability to customize Hub OS to fit their specific operational needs, but they also express a desire for more features and improvements... Users love the ability to customize Hub OS to fit their specific operational needs, but they also express a desire for more features and improvements in this area, such as better customization options for reports and user interfaces.
The maintenance module receives high marks for its ease of use and reliability. Users find it particularly effective for tracking and managing both pr... The maintenance module receives high marks for its ease of use and reliability. Users find it particularly effective for tracking and managing both preventive and corrective maintenance tasks, leading to quicker resolution of issues.
Where hoteliers push back
Hub OS is well-regarded for its seamless integration with property management systems like SAP and Opera, which helps streamline operations across dif... Hub OS is well-regarded for its seamless integration with property management systems like SAP and Opera, which helps streamline operations across different hotel departments. However, some users point out that integration can be slow or require frequent updates.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite and hub OS Maintenance share many core Hotel Maintenance Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite offers 24 verified integration partners, while hub OS Maintenance offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite: No. hub OS Maintenance: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Maintenance Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Flexkeeping has an HT Score of 93 and hub OS has 37. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor