The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 114 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Flexkeeping shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest requests and Mobile Request Dispatching.
hub OS shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 114 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 109 | 5 |
After analyzing 114 verified reviews, Flexkeeping users most value its task management, staff communication, room and task assignments, while hub OS users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Task Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Staff Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Room and Task Assignments
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Other Systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Language Options
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 12 reviews | #11 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #7 53 reviews | #9 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 25 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 18 reviews | #21 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 43 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 43 reviews | #12 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 33 reviews | #9 5 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 15 reviews | #15 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #12 8 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #2 88 reviews | #4 4 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #10 1 reviews | #12 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #8 0 reviews |
When evaluating staff collaboration tools for your hotel, both Flexkeeping's Collaborations Suite and hub OS Staff App aim to enhance team communication, streamline operations, and improve guest experiences. Flexkeeping is a dedicated hotel operations platform with a broad suite of features focusing on task management, communication, and automation, while hub OS offers an all-in-one property management system emphasizing coordination and response times. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize specialized hotel workflows or an integrated property management approach.
Flexkeeping boasts a high review count (98) with recent feedback, indicating a well-established, trusted solution. In contrast, hub OS has only four reviews and no recent feedback, making Flexkeeping clearly the more proven and reliable option for hoteliers seeking current performance insights.
Flexkeeping and hub OS both address staff communication and operational efficiency, but they diverge in scope and depth. Flexkeeping offers a broad set of features dedicated solely to hotel staff collaboration, such as real-time task tracking, guest request handling, and extensive automation modules. Its focus on hotel-specific workflows allows your team to manage housekeeping, maintenance, and guest requests within a single platform.
Hub OS, however, aims to serve as a comprehensive property management system, integrating staff coordination with reservations, billing, and other hotel operations. Its primary strength lies in unifying all property functions into one app, which is advantageous if your hotel prefers an all-in-one platform rather than specialized modules. Given that Flexkeeping has more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, it demonstrates stronger market confidence and ongoing customer satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a staff collaboration tool specifically designed for operational efficiency, go with Flexkeeping. Its suite of 38 unique features like automated task routing, real-time analytics, and multi-language UI supports fast onboarding and highly effective teamwork, especially in large or complex properties.
If, instead, your hotel requires an integrated platform that combines guest management, front desk, and staff coordination in one system, hub OS might seem appealing. However, given that Flexkeeping's larger review base and recent positive feedback confirm its effectiveness, it’s the safer choice for hotels focused on staff collaboration and operational agility.
Flexkeeping scores a 4.94/5 for ease of use, reflecting a highly intuitive interface and quick onboarding process that staff find straightforward. Its consistent positive reviews mention how staff quickly adapt, citing a clear and simple layout and effective training support.
hub OS scores slightly lower at 4.5/5, with some users noting occasional delays when system updates are implemented or navigating certain features can be less streamlined. Reviewers praise its support team but highlight minor usability issues when reflecting changes in other hotel systems like Opera.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping offers 38 unique features, including modules like Lost & Found, Guest Requests, Automated Room Assignments, Deep Cleaning Scheduling, and Real-Time Task Tracking. These specific functionalities cater directly to hotel staff operations, enabling task automation, detailed analytics, and multilingual support.
hub OS, by contrast, does not specify unique features but emphasizes core property management functions like guest interactions and housekeeping coordination within a single app. However, it lacks the wide array of specialized hotel features that Flexkeeping provides.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping's support and onboarding ratings are 4.91/5, with reviewers frequently stating its team is responsive, helpful, and proactive. One user noted, “Support is excellent and always available to overcome challenges,” reflecting high satisfaction.
hub OS scores 4/5, with some users mentioning support is good but less comprehensive. Comments highlight occasional delays in reflection of system updates and a desire for improved real-time assistance.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping has verified integrations with 24 partners, including industry leaders like RMS, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Cloudbeds. It also supports a broad range of modules, from PMS to channel managers, facilitating a connected hotel ecosystem.
hub OS, with 23 verified partners, offers similar integration options, sharing several common partners. Nevertheless, Flexkeeping's slightly higher number of integrations and extensive API support provide greater flexibility.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping’s reviews are 98 in number, with a 4.97/5 rating and recent feedback from hotels across segments like resorts, city hotels, and branded properties. Its customers consistently praise its ease of use, value, and operational impact.
hub OS has only four reviews, with no recent feedback, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction. The existing ratings and reviews favor Flexkeeping, indicating it’s more trusted and valued by hoteliers.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping charges a flat fee of $300 per month, with no implementation or trial fees, offering a transparent pricing model. Its platform provides a full suite of hotel staff collaboration features without hidden costs.
Pricing for hub OS is not publicly disclosed, but it is likely to be part of a broader property management system, which often involves custom quotes and potential setup fees. The lack of clear pricing suggests Flexkeeping is more straightforward and accessible for hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Flexkeeping stands out as a specialized hotel operations tool with a proven track record, boasting a high review count, recent positive feedback, and a broad feature set tailored to staff collaboration. Its focus on task management, automation, and multi-language support makes it ideal for hotels that want to improve operational efficiency and staff communication.
If your hotel prioritizes a dedicated, feature-rich staff collaboration platform, Flexkeeping is the clear choice. Its extensive integrations, excellent support, and proven market presence make it the safer, more reliable option for hotels serious about operational excellence.
Conversely, hub OS offers an integrated property management approach that consolidates guest and staff functions, making it suitable for smaller, boutique, or properties seeking a unified platform. However, due to limited recent reviews and less specialization, it appears less suited for hotels with complex operations or a focus on staff collaboration.
Overall, for most hotels actively evaluating staff collaboration tools today, Flexkeeping’s established reputation and ongoing customer satisfaction make it the more dependable investment.
Staff Collaboration Tools pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite and HubOS Staff App share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Room Assignments | ||
| Guest requests | ||
| Lost & found | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Mobile Request Dispatching | ||
| Progress Tracking Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 26 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Flexkeeping completely transformed our workflow which led to an 80% reduction in the workload, simplifying processes and massively lowering our stress levels!"
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Every comment a guest makes gets immediately communicated throughout the whole hotel. Since it’s such a transparent platform, staff can react instantly, and management can stay inf..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently highlight Flexkeeping’s robust task management features, including efficient assignment, tracking, and management of tasks which stre... Users frequently highlight Flexkeeping’s robust task management features, including efficient assignment, tracking, and management of tasks which streamline operations and save time. Enhanced organization has significantly improved team collaboration, creating a more stress-free workflow.
The platform is commended for enhancing interdepartmental communication, connecting housekeeping, reception, and technical services instantly without... The platform is commended for enhancing interdepartmental communication, connecting housekeeping, reception, and technical services instantly without delays. This seamless connection results in improved team efficiency and reduced communication errors.
Flexkeeping excels in room and task assignments, allowing hotels to allocate rooms to cleaning staff effectively. This feature is noted to have expedi... Flexkeeping excels in room and task assignments, allowing hotels to allocate rooms to cleaning staff effectively. This feature is noted to have expedited room assignment and daily task creation, contributing to smooth operations.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally satisfied, some users express a desire for more customization options to better tailor the tool to specific team or property needs and... While generally satisfied, some users express a desire for more customization options to better tailor the tool to specific team or property needs and improve user experience.
Flexkeeping’s integration capabilities with systems like PMS are essential for holistic management, though some users experienced minor downtime issue... Flexkeeping’s integration capabilities with systems like PMS are essential for holistic management, though some users experienced minor downtime issues recently, which are expected to improve with ongoing system updates.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite and HubOS Staff App share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite offers 24 verified integration partners, while HubOS Staff App offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite: No. HubOS Staff App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Flexkeeping has an HT Score of 92 and hub OS has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor