The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 40 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and Mobile App.
Radiant1 shines , with exclusive features like Market Insights Reporting and Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization.
Side-by-side ratings based on 40 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 40 | 0 |
After analyzing 40 verified reviews, Infor users most value its customer support, reporting capabilities, forecasting support, while Radiant1 users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Forecasting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Rate Recommendations
▾
|
|
|
−
Forecast Accuracy
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #43 1 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #24 11 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 19 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #24 19 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 23 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 19 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #35 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #22 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #28 6 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #7 21 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #16 1 reviews | — |
Your hotel needs a revenue management system that can accurately forecast demand, optimize pricing, and streamline operations. Infor EzRMS and Radiant1 both aim to improve your revenue but take vastly different approaches: EzRMS is a well-established, comprehensive system with a focus on data-driven decisions, while Radiant1 offers an integrated solution that combines revenue management with property operations. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s strategy and operational needs?
Both products target revenue optimization, but Infor EzRMS boasts a longer history, a broader feature set, and more reviews—39 in total with recent feedback—making it more reliable in data accuracy and user satisfaction. Radiant1, on the other hand, is newer with no recent reviews or significant user feedback, which raises questions about its maturity and support for hotel-specific revenue management.
EzRMS’s strengths lie in its extensive reporting, demand forecasting, and integration capabilities, especially for larger, multi-property hotels. Radiant1 offers tools like a channel manager and booking engine, which are attractive for small to mid-sized properties seeking an all-in-one platform, but the absence of recent reviews makes its effectiveness uncertain.
Are you leaning toward a trusted, proven system or a newer platform with integrated property management features? Your choice should reflect your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic focus.
If your hotel needs a mature, data-rich revenue management system with proven performance, go with Infor EzRMS. Its high overall rating of 4.46/5, backed by 39 reviews, and recent positive feedback on reporting and forecasting support strategic decision-making, especially for larger or multi-property hotels.
If your hotel requires an all-in-one operational platform that combines revenue management with channel distribution and booking tools, Radiant1 might appeal. However, with zero recent reviews or user testimonials, it’s hard to assess whether Radiant1 can truly meet your expectations.
In summary, choose EzRMS for proven revenue optimization or Radiant1 if you prioritize operational integration and are comfortable with an untested platform.
EzRMS scores a 4.49/5 for ease of use, with many users highlighting its straightforward interface, detailed reports, and user-friendly navigation. Onboarding is rated 4.27/5, and support responsiveness is also strong, with reviews praising the helpful support team.
Radiant1’s user ratings and reviews are unavailable, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given its newer status and limited feedback, the assumption is that its interface and onboarding processes are less proven.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS offers 17 unique features such as contact management, client portals, content management, and a financial forecast builder—capabilities not present in Radiant1. Its features emphasize detailed reporting, multi-property management, and integration with property management systems.
Radiant1 includes 26 features like AI optimization, market insights, booking pattern analysis, and automation tools, aiming to enhance operational efficiency. However, it lacks some revenue-specific functionalities found in EzRMS, such as price sensitivity modeling and group evaluation tools.
Edge: Radiant1, for its broader feature count, but EzRMS remains more specialized for revenue management.
EzRMS scores 4.04/5 for support, with reviews praising its responsiveness and problem-solving ability. Users mention quick responses and effective solutions, although some suggest support hours could expand.
Radiant1’s customer support feedback is unavailable, which is a concern given its recent market entry. The lack of reviews makes it difficult to gauge support quality or responsiveness.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
EzRMS integrates with over 113 verified partners, including major property management systems and revenue tools, enabling seamless data flow across platforms. Its extensive ecosystem supports complex, multi-property environments.
Radiant1 has only one verified partner: Little Hotelier. This limited integration base suggests less flexibility and fewer connectivity options.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
With 39 reviews and recent feedback, EzRMS’s ratings reflect high satisfaction, averaging 4.46/5 overall. Hotels across segments—especially branded and independent properties—appreciate its detailed reporting, forecast accuracy, and support, with 86% likely to recommend.
Radiant1 has no reviews, so no ratings are available. The absence of recent user feedback indicates uncertainty about its performance and acceptance in the industry.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS does not publicly list pricing, reflecting its tailored, enterprise-level approach. Implementation fees, monthly charges, and licensing vary based on hotel size and complexity.
Radiant1 charges a straightforward $400 per month, with no trial or additional implementation fees. This flat fee may suit smaller properties seeking predictable costs but lacks detail about scalability.
In summary, EzRMS’s pricing is customized, while Radiant1 offers a transparent, fixed monthly fee.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that EzRMS is a proven, feature-rich revenue management system with extensive integrations, dedicated support, and a high user rating. Radiant1 presents itself as an integrated, operational platform with a focus on automation and visibility but suffers from a lack of recent user feedback, which raises questions about its maturity and industry acceptance.
Choose EzRMS if your hotel needs a reliable, data-driven revenue management system capable of handling complex environments and multiple properties. Opt for Radiant1 if you prioritize operational integration, online visibility, and a lower-cost, all-in-one platform—but proceed cautiously due to limited recent reviews.
In conclusion, the more established and review-backed product, Infor EzRMS, provides a safer, more proven solution for your revenue management needs. Radiant1 may appeal for operational convenience but requires further validation before committing.
According to HTR's product database, Infor EzRMS and Radiant1 share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Communication Portal | ||
| Contact Management/CRM | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Group Pricing | ||
| Itinerary Printouts | ||
| Manage Exceptions | ||
| Manage Sell-Outs & Cancellations | ||
| Price Explanation | ||
| Seating Management | ||
| Set Boundaries | ||
| Task Management (Tasks & Reminders) | ||
| Yield Room Types Individually |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, the... EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, there are suggestions for expanding support hours and having dedicated teams for specific markets.
EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both... EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both retrospective and predictive business monitoring, aiding in better strategic planning and decision-making.
The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some user... The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some users feel that the system's predictions are sometimes inaccurate and require further refinement to improve reliability.
Where hoteliers push back
EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accura... EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accuracy and automation of rate uploads, and there's room for improving synchronization with other systems to prevent issues like rate discrepancies.
Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general... Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general sentiment that while the tool is powerful, forecasts can sometimes diverge significantly from actual outcomes, especially amid dynamic conditions like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor EzRMS and Radiant1 share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor EzRMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Radiant1 offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor EzRMS leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor EzRMS: No. Radiant1: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 25 and Radiant1 has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor