The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Maxial shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Maxial users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Maxial |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
When choosing between Infor HMS and Maxial, your hotel must consider core functionality, user experience, support, and regional presence. Infor HMS, with its extensive reviews and proven performance, clearly leads in most categories, but Maxial’s offerings might appeal to niche markets. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational needs.
Both products aim to streamline property management, but their market presence and feature sets differ significantly. Will the more established, reviewed system meet your expectations, or does Maxial’s approach better fit your unique hotel environment?
Infor HMS and Maxial serve the same fundamental purpose: simplifying hotel operations and guest management. Infor HMS is a cloud-based platform with a broad feature set, including housekeeping, online support, guest profiles, and revenue management modules. Maxial’s offerings are less detailed but focus on integrating reservations, billing, and guest feedback.
While Infor HMS boasts a large user base, a solid global presence, and 46 reviews in the last six months—indicating recent activity—Maxial remains virtually unreviewed, making it difficult to assess its current performance. Do you prioritize proven, recent feedback, or are you open to evaluating an emerging system with limited data?
If your hotel requires a mature, well-supported property management system with extensive features like housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual capabilities, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes, especially those looking for proven integrations and regional coverage.
If your hotel is small or operates in a niche market with simpler needs, and you’re willing to take a gamble on a less-reviewed platform, Maxial might be worth exploring. However, with zero recent reviews and no detailed feature information, Infor’s well-documented track record makes it the safer, more reliable pick.
Infor HMS has a user rating of 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews noting its straightforward navigation once familiar. Its onboarding process scores 3.64, with users appreciating the quick setup but citing some room for additional training resources. The support team’s responsiveness is consistently praised, helping staff adopt the system smoothly.
Maxial’s usability remains unverified due to the absence of reviews. Its lack of documented user feedback makes it impossible to compare directly. Based on available data, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers over 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online 24/7 support, guest profiles, calendar view, direct billing, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, and revenue management tools. These are essential for larger, complex hotels seeking an all-in-one management platform.
Maxial provides no detailed feature list, making it impossible to compare feature depth or breadth. Given Infor’s extensive capabilities and documented unique modules, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS scores a 4.04 out of 5 for customer support, with many reviews highlighting the team’s responsiveness and professionalism. Users appreciate prompt assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, which is critical for operational continuity.
Maxial’s support ratings and user feedback are unavailable, leaving its service quality uncertain. When choosing a critical operational system, support quality can be decisive. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS connects with 113 verified partners, including major booking engines like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, along with revenue systems and other operational tools. These integrations streamline tasks and reduce manual work.
Maxial has no publicly verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with external systems. For hotels seeking a flexible, integrated platform, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has a total of 46 reviews, with a high overall rating of 4.04/5. Its recent reviews emphasize its feature richness and support quality. Hotels in independent, boutique, and city-center segments rate it notably higher, reflecting satisfaction among diverse property types.
Maxial’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison. Given the recent, substantial feedback for Infor, Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise solutions; costs often depend on hotel size and scope. Maxial’s pricing is similarly undisclosed, with no mention of trial options or billing models.
Your best approach is to contact vendors directly for quotes tailored to your hotel’s needs, but Infor’s established presence suggests a more predictable investment pathway.
Not ideal if your property is small, with minimal technological needs or limited budget for complex systems.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven reliability, extensive integrations, or regional support from a well-established vendor.
At its core, Infor HMS offers a proven, robust property management system supported by extensive reviews and a global presence. Its feature set and integrations address the needs of mid-sized to large hotels that require operational depth and reliability.
If your hotel values recent user feedback, a broad feature suite, and a trusted support network, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for hotels that need automation, multi-lingual support, and seamless booking integrations.
On the other hand, Maxial appears more suited for smaller properties or resorts with limited operational complexity eager to experiment with AI-driven reviews and simplified management. Yet, the absence of recent reviews and detailed features makes it a less certain option.
Choose Infor HMS if you prioritize proven performance, extensive features, and reliable support. Opt for Maxial only if your hotel’s needs are minimal, and you’re comfortable evaluating an untested system with limited user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Maxial share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Maxial share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Maxial offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Maxial: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Maxial has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor