The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 207 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and On premise.
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Native Email Marketing and Real Time Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 207 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 160 |
After analyzing 207 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Preno hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and budget. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they approach this goal differently. Infor HMS offers a more extensive feature set and broader regional coverage, while Preno focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and integration. Which one aligns better with your current and future hotel management plans?
Both Infor HMS and Preno are designed to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, but they diverge in scope and usability. Infor HMS, with its deep customization and broad integrations, caters more to larger or multiservice hotels seeking extensive control. Preno, on the other hand, simplifies daily tasks with a user-friendly interface ideal for smaller properties or those new to PMS technology.
Infor boasts a large user base across regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, though it has fewer recent reviews. Preno’s recent surge in reviews, especially with 144 total and new feedback within the last 6 months, boosts confidence in its ongoing support and usability. Are you prioritizing a system with a wide feature set or one that’s easier to learn and deploy?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, multi-lingual, and multi-currency PMS with strong enterprise features, go with Infor HMS. It’s best suited for larger hotels, resorts, and properties with complex operational needs that benefit from extensive integrations and on-premise deployment options.
If your team prefers a straightforward, cloud-based system that reduces admin time, supports multi-property management, and integrates smoothly with accounting and channel managers, Preno is the better choice. It suits boutique hotels, motels, and properties seeking quick deployment and ease of staff adoption.
In summary, choose Infor if you prioritize extensive customization and multi-region support, and opt for Preno if simplicity, rapid onboarding, and recent positive reviews matter most. The decision hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and your team’s technical comfort.
Based on current ratings, Preno is significantly easier to use, scoring 4.78/5 for ease of use against Infor’s 3.88/5. Preno’s intuitive interface facilitates quick onboarding, with many reviews praising its straightforward layout and support team. Conversely, Infor’s UI, though functional, is often described as less aesthetic and more complex, reflecting its broader feature set.
Preno’s onboarding scores 4.68/5, far surpassing Infor’s 3.64/5, indicating a smoother implementation. Your staff will likely find Preno’s setup and daily navigation less frustrating, especially if they’re less tech-savvy. Edge: Preno.
Infor offers 16 shared features plus 4 unique ones like multi-lingual support, multi-currency, and on-premise deployment, making it suitable for multi-region and complex operational needs. Preno, with 14 unique features, includes integrated CRS, native email marketing, booking engine, channel management, real-time reporting, and automation tools, focusing on automation and guest communication.
While Infor’s customization and multi-language capabilities are notable, Preno’s features like its integrated channel manager, booking engine, and automated space optimization are more directly aimed at streamlining operational workflows. For feature breadth, Infor’s extensive integrations and customization edge out Preno’s automation focus. Edge: Infor.
Preno’s recent reviews emphasize its responsive and helpful support team, with high praise for customer service, scoring 4.8/5. Many users describe Preno support as prompt, knowledgeable, and attentive, which aligns with its recent review activity.
Infor’s support is also rated well at 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting professionalism and promptness, but some mention delays during software updates and glitches. Given Preno’s higher recent ratings and more positive user quotes, it appears to provide a slightly better support experience today. Edge: Preno.
Infor boasts 113 verified partners, including major players like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate, offering a broad and diverse set of integrations suitable for larger, multi-service hotels. Preno has 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, and HelloShift, with a focus on essential tools for smaller properties.
Shared integrations include TrustYou and SiteMinder, but Infor’s extensive partner network makes it more adaptable for complex operations that rely on multiple third-party systems. If integrations are critical, Infor’s ecosystem is the clear leader. Edge: Infor.
Preno’s recent review count and ratings clearly favor it, with a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 144 reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Most reviews are recent, indicating high user satisfaction with support, ease, and features.
Infor’s overall rating is 4.04/5 from just 46 reviews, with no recent feedback. Hotelier feedback suggests that Preno’s simplicity and customer support resonate more strongly in the current market. When recent reviews matter, Preno is the preferred choice. Edge: Preno.
Infor does not publicly list its pricing, making direct comparison difficult, but it is generally positioned as a high-end solution with custom quotes. Preno charges a flat fee of $800 per month, with no additional implementation fee, offering predictable costs for small to midsize properties.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Infor, your decision may depend on budget flexibility. Preno’s straightforward pricing offers clarity, while Infor’s costs are likely higher and tailored to larger hotel chains or complex setups.
Not ideal if your property is small, has limited technical resources, or prioritizes ease and quick deployment.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, multi-lingual features, or on-premise deployment.
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, highly customizable PMS well-suited for large, complex hotels needing broad regional support and deep integrations. Its broad feature set, multi-lingual, and multi-currency capabilities make it ideal for properties with sophisticated operational demands, but it may be overkill for smaller hotels.
Preno excels in simplicity, user-friendliness, and rapid deployment, making it perfect for boutique hotels and properties seeking efficient management with minimal fuss. Its recent high review scores and focus on automation and integration provide a compelling value for smaller properties or those new to PMS technology.
If your hotel is large, regional, or highly complex, Infor’s richer feature set and partner ecosystem make it the logical pick. For properties prioritizing ease, recent positive reviews, and cost transparency, Preno is the smarter choice.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Preno share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 3.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor