The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 49 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and ROI , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Springer-Miller Systems shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 49 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 2 |
After analyzing 49 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Springer-Miller Systems users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | #64 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | #70 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | #42 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | #59 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | #55 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Springer-Miller Systems hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and the experience you want to deliver. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Infor HMS boasts a robust, cloud-based platform with a strong reputation backed by more reviews and recent feedback. Springer-Miller, while historically focused on luxury resorts, has a smaller footprint and fewer recent reviews. Which system aligns better with your priorities?
Both Infor HMS and Springer-Miller Systems serve the hospitality industry with property management solutions, but Infor’s cloud platform targets a broader range of hotel types with extensive features. Springer-Miller, primarily used in luxury resorts and spas, offers specialized tools suited for high-end properties but lacks recent review activity. The critical difference lies in the user feedback; Infor’s more recent reviews (zero in last six months but a higher overall review count) suggest ongoing product development and user engagement. Springer-Miller’s reviews are older, with limited recent insights, making Infor a more reliable choice for current hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a scalable, flexible, and cloud-based property management system with wide integrations, go with Infor HMS. It suits mid-sized to large hotels, boutique brands, and properties seeking customizable reporting and efficient housekeeping modules. Conversely, if your hotel is a luxury resort or spa looking for a specialized system with deep resort operation features, Springer-Miller’s SMS|Host and SpaSoft might seem appealing but is hampered by limited recent reviews and a smaller user base. For most hotels seeking a modern, supported solution, Infor’s recent momentum makes it the clear choice.
Infor HMS scores a 3.88/5 for ease of use, with many users appreciating its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding. Reviewers mention that once familiar, staff find the system efficient and manageable, although some note that the interface lacks modern aesthetics. Springer-Miller Systems, with a 2.25/5 rating, struggles with complexity—users describe configuration as “horrible,” especially around rates and reporting. Support responsiveness is generally better with Infor, which also offers more comprehensive onboarding. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 exclusive features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, multi-lingual capabilities, and a mobile app—many designed for operational flexibility. Springer-Miller includes core resort-focused features like recreational and timeshare management but lacks the extensive customization options and modern integrations found in Infor. The richness and variety of Infor’s features, especially in automation and multi-currency support, give it a significant edge. End: Infor HMS.
Infor scores a 4.04/5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting promptness, professionalism, and helpful onboarding. Hoteliers praise the support team’s responsiveness during system issues despite some frustrations with bugs during updates. Springer-Miller support is rated at 3.75/5; reviews mention support responsiveness but also recurring server downtimes and difficulties with configuration. Given Infor’s larger review base and recent feedback, support quality appears more consistent. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor boasts 113 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Otelier, which are crucial for modern hotel operations. Springer-Miller offers 37 verified integrations, with some unique partners like Zingle and Nevotek, but fewer overall options. Shared integrations include major booking engines and revenue tools, yet Infor’s broader partner ecosystem provides more operational flexibility. End: Infor HMS.
Infor’s overall rating is 4.04/5 based on 46 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its robustness and customization. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, rate Infor higher, often citing ease of use and support quality. Springer-Miller’s ratings stand at 2.75/5, with reviews mostly from resort properties; smaller or non-luxury hotels tend to rate it poorly due to complexity and support issues. Given the recent review volume and higher rating, Infor is the preferred choice by hotelier standards. End: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed, and both operate on custom quotes, likely based on property size and needs. Infor’s model emphasizes a cloud subscription, potentially reducing upfront costs, while Springer-Miller’s solutions are typically tailored for high-end resorts, possibly with higher implementation costs. Your hotel should request tailored quotes to compare actual price points.
The core difference is Infor’s broad feature set, cloud deployment, and recent review activity, making it suitable for a variety of hotel types. Springer-Miller is specialized for luxury resorts with complex operational needs but lacks recent reviews, limiting confidence in current support and usability.
Choose Infor HMS if you want a modern, flexible, and well-supported property management system that can grow with your hotel. Its extensive integration options and user satisfaction make it a strong, reliable choice for most properties aiming to improve operational efficiency.
Opt for Springer-Miller if your hotel is a luxury resort or spa that already relies on their niche features and can tolerate limited recent feedback. However, be aware of the potential for support challenges and complexity, especially if considering future scalability or broader operational needs.
In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing ease of use, recent positive reviews, and extensive integrations, Infor HMS is the safer, more future-proof investment. Springer-Miller remains a niche option for high-end resorts with specific operational demands but may not deliver the same support confidence today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Springer Miller share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Springer Miller share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Springer Miller offers 37. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 2.2/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Springer Miller: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Springer-Miller Systems has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor