The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 83 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
FRIVA shines .
straiv shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Side-by-side ratings based on 83 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 83 |
After analyzing 83 verified reviews, FRIVA users most value its , while straiv users highlight digital check-in and check-out, guest communication and customization, ease of implementation and use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| FRIVA |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Digital check-in and check-out
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication and customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of implementation and use
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Payment process issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 27 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 41 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #5 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 79 reviews |
Choosing between mySimpleClient by FRIVA and straiv for your hotel's contactless check-in solution hinges on your specific needs and priorities. Both aim to streamline guest onboarding and improve operational efficiency, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. While FRIVA’s offering is virtually unreviewed and lacks active development, straiv’s mature platform benefits from extensive user feedback and a broad feature set. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s size, technology maturity, and guest experience goals?
Both mySimpleClient and straiv address the need for contactless check-in, reducing physical interactions and speeding up arrival procedures. However, straiv’s platform offers over 19 distinct features designed explicitly for digital guest journeys, including mobile check-in, guest messaging, and PMS integrations, with a recent review count of 81 and an average rating of 4.81/5. Meanwhile, mySimpleClient remains largely unreviewed and does not appear to have ongoing support or active updates, which raises questions about its current viability.
Your team must consider whether a product with proven features and recent positive reviews suits your needs better than an unsupported solution. Are you seeking a mature platform with extensive functionalities and a strong user base, or are you open to a less established option that may lack ongoing development? The choice ultimately depends on your readiness to adopt a platform with a track record and active support.
If your hotel prioritizes a contactless check-in solution with a broad feature set that enhances operational efficiency and guest experience, straiv is the clear choice. It is used by over 3,400 hotels across 30 countries, with recent reviews praising its ease of use, integrations, and support. If, however, your hotel is smaller, less tech-focused, or prefers a simple, lightweight CRM without many features, mySimpleClient might seem appealing—but its lack of recent reviews and active development makes it a risky option.
Given the data, if your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported system with extensive features, straiv should be your pick. If your focus is on a basic CRM with no active updates or proven user satisfaction, mySimpleClient might suffice, though it’s hard to recommend without recent validation.
Straiv’s platform scores 4.69/5 on ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, smooth implementation, and minimal IT requirements. Users consistently mention how quickly staff adapt to the system, with some noting that it requires no advanced IT skills. In contrast, mySimpleClient’s usability data is unavailable, and there are no recent reviews to assess how easily your staff could adopt it.
Edge: straiv.
Straiv offers 19 features tailored for comprehensive contactless guest journeys, including mobile check-in, room service ordering, guest messaging, PMS integration, and device-agnostic access. MySimpleClient, on the other hand, appears to focus on CRM functions, with no additional features listed or verified. Its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews make it less compelling for hotels seeking a full-scale digital check-in solution.
Edge: straiv.
Straiv’s customer support scores 4.72/5, with reviews praising the responsiveness and professionalism of its support team. Users note quick problem resolution and helpful communication, contributing to a high likelihood to recommend of 95%. MySimpleClient offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality.
Edge: straiv.
Straiv integrates with 36 verified partners, including major PMS systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Protel, as well as features like guest messaging and room access. MySimpleClient does not list any verified integrations, raising concerns about its ability to connect seamlessly with existing hotel systems.
Edge: straiv.
With 81 recent reviews, straiv boasts a high overall rating of 4.81/5 and a Net Promoter Score of 9.51/10. It is particularly favored by hotels in Europe, boutique properties, and urban hotels. MySimpleClient has no recent reviews, review counts, or ratings, making it impossible to assess guest or hotelier satisfaction.
Edge: straiv.
MySimpleClient offers no publicly available pricing information, which suggests it might be a custom or unsupported solution. Straiv’s price is listed at $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial, indicating a straightforward subscription model.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Straiv’s platform is a comprehensive, well-supported solution designed explicitly for contactless check-in and guest journey management. Its extensive features, broad integrations, and positive recent reviews make it suitable for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable digital check-in system.
If your hotel needs a proven product with active development, multiple integrations, and high customer satisfaction, go with straiv. It’s particularly ideal for hotels in Europe, mid-sized properties, and those wanting a future-proof solution.
Conversely, mySimpleClient offers a CRM-focused approach with no recent reviews or ongoing support, making it less suitable for hotels prioritizing a full digital guest journey. It may work for very small hotels with simple needs but carries uncertainty due to the lack of validation.
In summary, for most hotels evaluating contactless check-in solutions today, straiv stands out as the safer, more feature-rich, and more supported choice.
According to HTR's product database, mySimpleClient and straiv share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize... Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize the benefits of contactless processes, especially during the COVID-19 era, providing guests with seamless and flexible arrivals and departures, while ensuring compliance with health safety protocols.
Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely infor... Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely information exchange, promotional offers, and enhances overall guest satisfaction. Reviews laud the flexibility in designing guest interactions based on individual hotel needs.
Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the to... Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the tool's intuitive user interface, making it easy for both staff and guests to interact with the system.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payme... Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payment gateways are suggested to enhance efficiency and reliability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. mySimpleClient and straiv share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. mySimpleClient offers 0 verified integration partners, while straiv offers 37. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. straiv leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
mySimpleClient: No. straiv: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. FRIVA has an HT Score of 0 and straiv has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor