The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 181 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cendyn shines when it comes to support team responsiveness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Dynamic Pricing and Multi-property management.
eRevMax shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 181 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 172 | 9 |
After analyzing 181 verified reviews, Cendyn users most value its support team responsiveness, booking engine ease of use, rate plan management, while eRevMax users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team Responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Plan Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-Time Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking Notifications Delay
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 28 reviews | #10 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 66 reviews | #10 2 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 36 reviews | #7 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 33 reviews | #9 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 96 reviews | #9 5 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 67 reviews | #10 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 53 reviews | #9 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 13 reviews | #8 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 115 reviews | #7 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 26 reviews | #12 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #1 9 reviews | #9 0 reviews |
| Middle East | #5 4 reviews | #1 4 reviews |
Choosing the right Central Reservation System (CRS) can drastically influence your hotel's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest experience. Both Cendyn CRS and RateTiger CRS aim to streamline reservations, distribution, and rate management—yet they differ significantly in their approach, feature set, and market focus. Your hotel’s specific needs, property size, and operational complexity will determine which platform aligns best with your goals. Are you ready to compare both systems thoroughly?
Cendyn CRS offers a comprehensive, cloud-native platform with robust integrations, dynamic pricing, and multi-property management. It boasts a high overall rating of 4.47 out of 5 based on 136 recent reviews, with a strong emphasis on scalability and security.
RateTiger CRS, however, has a smaller review base with just 7 reviews and lacks an overall rating but is praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive distribution network, and strong reputation among long-term users. It’s primarily focused on distribution and channel management at a lower operational cost.
Both products aim to improve distribution and revenue but do so with different emphases: Cendyn offers more advanced features and connectivity, while RateTiger excels in broad distribution and ease of use. So, which one addresses your hotel’s unique challenges more directly?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated, scalable CRM and reservations platform that supports complex rate strategies, multi-property management, and future-proof architecture, go with Cendyn CRS. It’s especially suitable for independent, boutique, and branded hotels that want to enhance operational efficiency and revenue through advanced features like dynamic pricing and PMS connectivity.
If your hotel prioritizes extensive distribution at a lower cost, with a focus on broad online exposure, flexible channel management, and a straightforward booking engine, RateTiger CRS is the better option. Its strengths lie in connecting with over 650,000 travel agents, OTAs, and meta channels, making it ideal for hotels seeking to maximize online reach with less complexity.
For larger or tech-savvy hotels seeking advanced automation and integration, Cendyn’s more feature-rich platform will serve you better. Smaller or mid-sized properties aiming for cost-effective, wide-reaching distribution should consider RateTiger.
Cendyn CRS scores a 4.34 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and seamless onboarding. Users appreciate its streamlined workflows, especially for managing multiple properties and rates, and report that staff adoption is straightforward once trained.
RateTiger CRS maintains a solid 4.14 out of 5 rating, with reviewers praising its simplicity and clear navigation. Long-term users mention that its automation features significantly reduce manual efforts, although some note initial setup can be complex for less experienced staff.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
Cendyn CRS offers 8 features exclusive to its platform, including dynamic pricing, multi-property management, PMS connectivity, centralized user roles, support for weekly & monthly rates, booking rules, TMC management, and availability management. These are designed to give hoteliers granular control over revenue and operations.
RateTiger CRS, while lacking exclusive features, provides a comprehensive suite for online distribution, including channel management, rate and inventory synchronization, GDS access, and a customizable booking engine. Its extensive distribution network and content push features are notable but less advanced in dynamic pricing and property management.
Overall, Cendyn’s feature set is more suited for hotels that require detailed control and automation. RateTiger excels in broad distribution and user-friendly management.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
Cendyn CRS scores a 4.54 out of 5 for support, with reviewers citing responsive, supportive teams that help streamline onboarding and resolve issues quickly. However, some users report occasional communication delays, especially during busy periods.
RateTiger CRS has a slightly higher support score of 4.71/5, with reviews highlighting prompt responses and effective guidance. Long-term users appreciate its dedicated support, which has helped them maximize platform utility.
Edge: RateTiger CRS.
Cendyn CRS boasts 116 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Visual Matrix PMS, HotelTime, GuestCentric, and TrustYou. Its extensive network allows for seamless connections with PMS, CRM, and other hotel systems, supporting multi-property setups.
RateTiger CRS features 70 verified partners, including key integrations such as GDS, OTAs, and content management tools. It supports over 650,000 travel agents and channels, with shared partners like Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and GHA. Its focus is on broad distribution rather than deep property management.
Overall, Cendyn’s larger integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable for complex hotel setups. RateTiger’s strength lies in its expansive distribution network.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
Cendyn CRS has a higher overall rating of 4.47/5, based on 136 recent reviews, with an 89% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its flexibility, support, and advanced features.
RateTiger CRS, despite fewer reviews, boasts a 9.29/5 NPS score, with users emphasizing its ease of use, extensive distribution, and cost-effectiveness. Long-term users love its automation and broad partner network.
Given the larger, more recent review base and higher overall rating, Cendyn clearly leads in user satisfaction.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
Cendyn CRS charges a base price of $700 per month, with no apparent trial or freemium options. Pricing may vary based on the number of properties and required customizations, but the cost is transparent compared to the unknown pricing of RateTiger.
RateTiger CRS does not publicly list specific pricing; it offers customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. Its model appears to be more flexible but less transparent.
If cost transparency and predictable spend are priorities, Cendyn’s flat rate provides clarity. For tailored solutions, RateTiger may offer more flexibility.
Not ideal if you are a small hotel with minimal distribution needs or limited budget.
Not ideal if you need deep property management features or complex rate automation.
Cendyn CRS offers a more comprehensive, feature-rich platform suited for hotels seeking advanced management, automation, and multi-property control. Its superior ratings and larger review base make it a clear choice for properties looking to grow revenue and streamline operations.
RateTiger CRS excels in broad distribution and ease of use, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize extensive online reach and straightforward management at a lower cost. Its strong support and established reputation among long-term users are valuable assets.
If your hotel aims for sophisticated revenue management and integrated operations, go with Cendyn CRS. If your focus is on wide distribution, channel automation, and cost-efficiency, RateTiger CRS is the right fit.
In summary, Cendyn CRS’s advanced features, large review base, and recent positive feedback favor it for most hotels seeking scalability and automation. RateTiger CRS remains a strong option for distribution-focused properties prioritizing simplicity and broad channel reach.
According to HTR's product database, Cendyn CRS and RateTiger CRS (by eRevMax) share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Rules | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Multi-property management | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The support team’s promptness and effectiveness are frequently praised. Users appreciate the quick response times and professional assistance in resol... The support team’s promptness and effectiveness are frequently praised. Users appreciate the quick response times and professional assistance in resolving issues, which enhances their overall experience with the system.
The booking engine by Pegasus is frequently mentioned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, both for hotel staff and guests. Users appreciate how... The booking engine by Pegasus is frequently mentioned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, both for hotel staff and guests. Users appreciate how easy it is to create rate plans, manage reservations, and navigate the system, which significantly streamlines the booking process.
Many reviews note the effectiveness of Pegasus in handling rate plan configuration, offering extensive customizability to suit different hotel needs.... Many reviews note the effectiveness of Pegasus in handling rate plan configuration, offering extensive customizability to suit different hotel needs. This includes deriving rates from existing plans and making bulk updates, which improves revenue management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users feel that certain aspects of the booking engine and rate management features could benefit from greater customization. Suggestions include... Some users feel that certain aspects of the booking engine and rate management features could benefit from greater customization. Suggestions include more flexibility in layout design and the ability to integrate personalized modifications without extensive support intervention.
Some reviews highlight interface problems, particularly with integration systems like SiteMinder. Users mention the need for regular refreshes and occ... Some reviews highlight interface problems, particularly with integration systems like SiteMinder. Users mention the need for regular refreshes and occasional connectivity disruptions, which lead to inconsistencies in rate and inventory management.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cendyn CRS and RateTiger CRS (by eRevMax) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Cendyn CRS offers 116 verified integration partners, while RateTiger CRS (by eRevMax) offers 70. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cendyn CRS leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cendyn CRS: No. RateTiger CRS (by eRevMax): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cendyn has an HT Score of 88 and eRevMax has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor