The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Razorpay shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, Razorpay users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Razorpay |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Razorpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Razorpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Razorpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing between Razorpay and ROH hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Razorpay, with zero reviews and a global presence, is a generic solution with no recent data, making it a less reliable choice. Conversely, ROH boasts 65 reviews, a near-perfect recent score of 9.91/10, and a 99% likelihood to recommend—indicating it’s a trusted solution tailored for hospitality. Your decision should consider which platform better aligns with your operational priorities.
Both products aim to simplify hotel payments, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Razorpay offers no detailed features or reviews, while ROH provides a comprehensive suite of 19 features, backed by recent positive feedback. Are you ready to focus on a proven, hospitality-focused solution?
Razorpay is a generic payments platform with a broad application outside hospitality, offering limited hotel-specific features. ROH, however, is designed explicitly for the hospitality industry, automating invoicing, scheduling, and guest payments, which reduces manual work. Razorpay’s lack of recent reviews and features makes it difficult to assess suitability, whereas ROH’s recent reviews emphasize ease of use and automation benefits.
Razorpay’s one verified integration (Yanolja Cloud Solution) contrasts with ROH’s single integration (Oracle Hospitality), but ROH’s 19 features—like refund management, pre-authorizations, and payment splitting—are tailored specifically for hotel operations. Would your team benefit from hospitality-centric features? Do you need a proven track record?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, global payment gateway with basic capabilities, Razorpay might seem appealing. Yet, with zero reviews and no recent data, it’s impossible to confirm if Razorpay addresses your needs efficiently. If your hotel prioritizes automation, detailed invoicing, and industry-specific functionalities, ROH is the clear leader, supported by recent reviews praising its user-friendliness and automation.
For hotels that need quick setup and broad international payment options, Razorpay could work, but limited data weakens its case. Meanwhile, ROH’s strong reviews, recent successful case study (Le Méridien St. Louis), and extensive features make it the safer, more insightful choice for hotels focused on operational efficiency and cash flow.
Razorpay’s user interface and onboarding process are not rated or reviewed, making it impossible to gauge ease of use. In contrast, ROH scores a near-perfect 4.95/5 for ease of use and 4.92/5 for onboarding, backed by detailed reviews highlighting its intuitive design. Hotel staff find ROH’s platform simple to implement and operate, with clients noting how quickly they adapted.
ROH’s support team is highly praised, with users emphasizing their satisfaction with onboarding assistance and customer service. When it comes to user-friendliness, the data clearly favors ROH.
Edge: ROH
Razorpay does not list any unique features tailored to hotels, offering no specific capabilities beyond basic payment processing. ROH, by comparison, provides 19 features including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, recurring payments, acceptances of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, Amex, and multiple processors, among others. This extensive feature set addresses common hotel needs like invoice automation, guest payments, and chargeback management.
The absence of hotel-specific features in Razorpay makes it less competitive, especially considering ROH’s focus on automating complex payment workflows. If hotel-specific functionalities are critical, ROH’s detailed feature suite makes it the clear choice.
Edge: ROH
Razorpay’s support and onboarding ratings are not available, which raises concerns about potential post-sale assistance. ROH, with a 4.97/5 customer support rating, consistently receives praise for its responsiveness and quality of service. Reviewers describe ROH’s support as "great," emphasizing their confidence in the onboarding process and ongoing assistance.
Given the importance of reliable support in payment systems, especially during critical booking or billing periods, ROH’s high ratings and recent reviews provide peace of mind. Razorpay’s support remains unverified, making ROH the safer bet.
Edge: ROH
Both Razorpay and ROH offer a single verified partner each—Yanolja Cloud Solution and Oracle Hospitality, respectively. The limited integrations suggest either platform may require additional development for hotel-specific systems. However, ROH’s integration with Oracle Hospitality, a major hospitality PMS provider, indicates a more direct connection to hotel operations.
Since both platforms currently have minimal integration options, the decision should focus on other factors like features or support, but ROH’s connection to industry-standard systems slightly favors its integration potential.
Edge: ROH
Razorpay has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. ROH, on the other hand, has accumulated 65 reviews, with a near-perfect NPS score of 9.91/10 and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments—especially luxury, resorts, and independent properties—rate ROH highly for ease of use and automation.
The recent reviews and high ratings show that ROH consistently meets hotel expectations. Razorpay’s lack of feedback makes it an unreliable choice for hotelier satisfaction.
Edge: ROH
Razorpay does not publish pricing details, which introduces uncertainty. ROH charges a straightforward base price of $100 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room fees. The transparent pricing model in ROH helps hotels evaluate ROI more accurately.
Without concrete pricing, Razorpay’s cost structure remains unclear. ROH’s clear fee structure and high value for money through extensive features make it easier for your team to budget.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Razorpay offers a basic, global payment gateway with no recent reviews or hotel-specific features. Its lack of recent data and limited integrations make it a risky choice for hotels looking for reliability and automation. ROH, on the other hand, is a dedicated hospitality payments platform with extensive features, excellent recent reviews, and proven results.
If your hotel prioritizes automation, support, and industry focus, ROH is the clear winner. Its high ratings and real-world success stories suggest it will deliver consistent value, especially in operational efficiency and cash flow management.
Choose ROH if you want a payment platform built with hotels in mind, supported by proven results. Razorpay may suit very small, regional operations that are comfortable with unverified support and minimal hotel features—though the risk is higher.
According to HTR's product database, Razorpay and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Razorpay |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Razorpay and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Razorpay offers 1 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Razorpay: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Razorpay has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor