The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 158 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Tripleseat shines in onboarding, training, and support responsiveness — especially for resort properties (4.7/5), with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and PCI Compliant Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 158 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 158 |
After analyzing 158 verified reviews, RFPMaker users most value its , while Tripleseat users highlight onboarding, training, and support responsiveness, customization and property-specific flexibility, beos, proposals, and contract creation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Onboarding, training, and support responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and property-specific flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
BEOs, proposals, and contract creation
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized event and lead management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integrations with PMS, POS, and other hotel systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Payments, invoicing, and billing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Sales Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 90 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 28 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #6 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 101 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #4 41 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 144 reviews |
| Europe | — | #7 4 reviews |
RFPMaker and Tripleseat serve fundamentally different needs within hotel sales operations. RFPMaker is a niche SaaS platform dedicated exclusively to negotiating and managing corporate accommodation contracts without commission fees. It connects property owners directly with corporate clients such as companies and travel agents to establish agreed room rates and booking volumes. Tripleseat, by contrast, is a comprehensive group sales and catering management platform designed to streamline all aspects of event and group business, from lead capture to contract management, BEOs, and payments.
Both products address the challenge of managing complex group bookings and corporate sales, but Tripleseat covers a broader operational scope including CRM, event management, and collaboration tools, while RFPMaker focuses narrowly on contract negotiation for corporate rates. Hotels seeking end-to-end group sales management and event coordination will find Tripleseat more aligned with their operational workflows. Properties focused solely on corporate rate negotiation with minimal event management needs might consider RFPMaker, though the lack of review data limits confidence in its current market fit.
If your hotel manages a high volume of corporate accommodation contracts and requires a platform to negotiate rates directly with corporate clients without commission fees, RFPMaker’s specialized SaaS may be a fit. However, this recommendation is theoretical as RFPMaker has no verified reviews or public pricing, and its user base is unreported. Hotels with limited event or group sales complexity and a focus on corporate RFPs could find value in RFPMaker’s streamlined approach.
If your property hosts group events, meetings, or weddings and needs a unified platform to manage contacts, proposals, contracts, BEOs, payments, and client communication, Tripleseat is the clear choice. Tripleseat has 158 reviews averaging 4.4/5 overall, including 30 in the last six months with a 4.3/5 rating, indicating stable and current satisfaction. It serves a broad hotel portfolio including boutique hotels (24% of its users), luxury hotels (14%), branded hotels (7%), and resorts (3%), with segment ratings consistently above 4.3/5. Tripleseat’s integration with 16 verified partners further supports diverse operational needs across hotel segments.
Tripleseat scores 4.4/5 for ease of use and 4.4/5 for onboarding across 158 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and rapid adoption by sales and event teams. Reviewers highlight the platform’s structured workflows and the ability to reduce manual work, which directly benefits front desk and sales staff managing multiple events and leads simultaneously.
RFPMaker has no available user ratings or onboarding feedback, making direct comparison impossible. Without reviews, it is unclear how well its users adopt the platform or how steep the learning curve is.
Edge: Even.
Tripleseat offers over 20 unique features critical to hotel group sales and event management that RFPMaker lacks entirely. These include Contact Management/CRM for tracking leads and clients, customizable proposal, contract, and BEO document creation to accelerate event booking, automated task management with reminders to keep teams aligned, and a client communication portal that enhances customer experience. Tripleseat supports PCI-compliant payments and eSignatures to streamline invoicing and contract closure, key operational efficiencies front desk and sales staff rely on.
RFPMaker provides no listed features beyond its core function of corporate accommodation rate negotiation and contract communication. It lacks event management, document automation, payment processing, and CRM capabilities. For properties requiring comprehensive sales and catering management, RFPMaker’s feature set is insufficient.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat scores 4.5/5 for customer support and 4.4/5 for onboarding, based on 158 reviews, with recent feedback praising responsive account managers and helpful training specialists. One user commended an account manager for resolving questions quickly and clarifying system functionality, which improved operational efficiency and staff confidence. However, some reviewers note occasional delays in feature updates and support responsiveness depending on property-specific requests.
RFPMaker has no customer support ratings or reviews available, so its support quality cannot be assessed or compared.
Edge: Even.
Tripleseat integrates with 16 verified partners critical to hotel operations, including PMS providers like WebRezPro, Stayntouch, and Oracle Hospitality, as well as payment processors like Stripe. These connections enable automated data synchronization between sales, reservations, billing, and event management systems, reducing duplicate entry and errors. Integrations with platforms such as SEVENROOMS and Benbria support guest experience and operational efficiency.
RFPMaker currently lists zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with hotel PMS, POS, or revenue management systems. Hotels relying on system interoperability to reduce manual workflows will find Tripleseat’s integration ecosystem significantly more robust.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat holds a solid 4.4/5 overall rating from 158 reviews, including 30 reviews in the last six months with a 4.3/5 rating, showing consistent user satisfaction over time. Ratings by hotel segment show Tripleseat performing equally well across boutique hotels (4.4/5, 101 reviews), luxury hotels (4.4/5, 58 reviews), branded hotels (4.4/5, 43 reviews), and resorts (4.7/5, 46 reviews). This breadth of positive feedback across segments demonstrates Tripleseat’s broad applicability and operational value.
RFPMaker has no reviews or ratings, so no comparison is possible. The absence of user feedback limits the reliability of any claims regarding its effectiveness or hotelier satisfaction.
Edge: Even.
Tripleseat pricing starts at $400 per month, with no implementation fee or trial period offered publicly. This pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set and integration capabilities, suitable for hotels managing multiple group sales or event workflows.
RFPMaker does not publish any pricing information, does not offer a free tier or trial, and its pricing model is undisclosed. This lack of transparency complicates budgeting or ROI analysis for prospective users.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RFPMaker focuses narrowly on facilitating commission-free negotiation and contract management for corporate accommodation rates. Tripleseat offers a full-featured group sales and catering platform covering contact management, event workflows, document automation, payments, and integration with hotel systems. This fundamental difference defines their market positioning and operational impact.
Choose RFPMaker if your hotel’s primary challenge is negotiating corporate accommodation contracts directly with companies or travel agents and you do not require event management or extensive sales workflow tools. However, note the absence of verified user reviews and integration partners, which raises questions about its maturity and operational support.
Choose Tripleseat if your hotel manages a wide range of group business and events, needs a centralized platform to handle leads, contracts, BEOs, payments, and client communication, and values integration with multiple hotel systems. Its 158 recent reviews averaging 4.4/5 and multi-segment adoption provide strong evidence of operational effectiveness and user satisfaction. Tripleseat’s $400/month pricing reflects the breadth of features and support it delivers.
Hotel Sales Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Sales CRM
|
|
|
| Mobile Sales CRM | ||
| Workflow Automations | ||
| Pipeline CRM | ||
| BEO Management | ||
| Lead Scoring | ||
| Contact Management | ||
|
▾
RPF Management
|
|
|
| Workflow Automations | ||
|
▾
F&B Planning
|
|
|
| File & Document Management | ||
| BEO Management | ||
|
▾
Contracts & E-Signatures
|
|
|
| Workflow Automations | ||
| Payments & Invoicing | ||
| File & Document Management | ||
| E-Signatures | ||
| Contract Management | ||
|
▾
Reporting & Analytics
|
|
|
| Chain Dashboard | ||
| Data Migration Services | ||
| Pace, Sales Activity, and GRC Reporting | ||
| Lead Scoring |
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Tripleseat has been an essential part of our event and catering operation at Hotel Hartness for the past four years. From the moment we transitioned away from our management compan..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
What hoteliers love
A recurring theme is the quality of onboarding and support, with many users praising fast implementation, helpful training, and responsive account tea... A recurring theme is the quality of onboarding and support, with many users praising fast implementation, helpful training, and responsive account teams. These experiences appear to reduce adoption friction and help hotels expand use across portfolios, though a few reviews describe support as unhelpful when property-specific changes are needed.
Users frequently mention the need to tailor Tripleseat to different property types, event styles, and workflows. They appreciate flexible templates, c... Users frequently mention the need to tailor Tripleseat to different property types, event styles, and workflows. They appreciate flexible templates, customization, and responsive product changes, but also note that some properties need workarounds for unique rules, tax handling, and menu or document behavior.
A frequent use case is building and managing BEOs, proposals, and contracts quickly and with less friction. Reviewers like the ease of custom proposal... A frequent use case is building and managing BEOs, proposals, and contracts quickly and with less friction. Reviewers like the ease of custom proposals, document sharing, and signature workflows, though several mention repetitive documents, awkward ordering, or edits that can force rework.
Where hoteliers push back
Integration value is repeatedly mentioned, especially syncing with PMS, billing, rooming, website, Outlook, and revenue tools. When integrations work,... Integration value is repeatedly mentioned, especially syncing with PMS, billing, rooming, website, Outlook, and revenue tools. When integrations work, they reduce duplicate entry and improve alignment; when they do not, users report double work, data mismatches, or glitches.
Payment collection and invoicing are important for hotels using Tripleseat to monetize events and reduce billing friction. Users like payment links an... Payment collection and invoicing are important for hotels using Tripleseat to monetize events and reduce billing friction. Users like payment links and online payments, but several note invoicing limitations, unreliable billing widgets, or missing payment features that can add manual work.
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. RFPMaker and Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform) share many core Hotel Sales Software features, but each has unique capabilities. RFPMaker offers 0 verified integration partners, while Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform) offers 16. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
RFPMaker: No. Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Sales Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RFPMaker has an HT Score of 0 and Tripleseat has 93. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property