The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 572 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
VIPS shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 572 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 572 | 0 |
After analyzing 572 verified reviews, RoomRaccoon users most value its ease of use, customer service, continuous improvement, while VIPS users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Critical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing Concerns
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Database Transparency
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 214 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 50 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 18 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #8 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 245 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 149 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 70 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 72 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 445 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #8 9 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #17 3 reviews | — |
Choosing between RoomRaccoon HMS and VIPS HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to centralize management tasks, but RoomRaccoon’s extensive features and broader integration ecosystem set it apart. VIPS, while an all-in-one solution, offers fewer reviews, less recent feedback, and a more limited regional presence. Your decision should reflect which product aligns best with your current scale and future plans.
RoomRaccoon’s platform is the clear choice for hotels prioritizing a trusted, scalable, and feature-rich management system. Its 484 reviews with recent feedback and a 4.95/5 rating demonstrate strong user satisfaction. VIPS, with no publicly available reviews or recent feedback, cannot match that level of proven performance.
Both products serve as comprehensive hotel management systems designed to streamline operations, but their reach and maturity differ significantly. RoomRaccoon integrates property management, channel management, booking engine, and payments in one platform, backed by a robust ecosystem of over 88 verified partners. VIPS touts an all-in-one approach but has a much smaller partner network with only 11 verified integrations, and no recent reviews to validate its claims. While VIPS might appear appealing for its simplicity, RoomRaccoon’s proven track record, especially among small to mid-sized hotels, makes it more reliable.
RoomRaccoon’s global presence spans 34 countries, making it suitable for hotels aiming for international growth, whereas VIPS is primarily focused on the European market. Both systems aim to centralize operations, but RoomRaccoon’s extensive automation and feature set make it a more complete solution. Given the lack of current feedback on VIPS, it’s difficult to gauge user satisfaction or ongoing support quality. Are you comfortable choosing a platform with such limited recent data?
If your hotel needs a proven, well-supported system with a broad feature set and international reach, go with RoomRaccoon. It’s ideal for small to mid-sized hotels, B&Bs, boutique properties, and serviced apartments looking to automate tasks, increase direct bookings, and improve operational efficiency.
If your hotel primarily operates within Europe, has straightforward management needs, and prefers a potentially simpler system without the extensive integrations, VIPS might seem suitable — but the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature data makes this choice risky. The more established, user-reviewed system, RoomRaccoon, offers confidence based on real user experiences.
RoomRaccoon’s user interface is highly rated at 4.87/5, with over 484 reviews emphasizing its intuitiveness and straightforward onboarding process. Users frequently mention that the system simplifies daily operations and reduces staff training time, with many praising its responsiveness and ease of navigation.
VIPS, with no recent reviews or detailed feedback available, offers no clear data on its user experience. Its smaller team and limited user base suggest that if it’s as intuitive as RoomRaccoon, it hasn’t been publicly validated. Without recent feedback, it’s difficult to compare support responsiveness or onboarding ease.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s platform boasts 57 unique features, including special offers & discounts, automated email communication, revenue management, multi-currency support, loyalty integration, and online check-in. It also offers advanced modules like group bookings, digital registration, integrated payment terminals, and automated night audits.
VIPS offers no detailed list of features, making it difficult to compare. Its limited partner network and absence of documented features suggest it lacks the breadth of automation and customization seen in RoomRaccoon. For a hotel seeking comprehensive control over operations and guest engagement, RoomRaccoon’s extensive feature set provides a decisive edge.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon has a support rating of 4.74/5 based on nearly 500 reviews, with many users highlighting its prompt, friendly, and knowledgeable customer service. Typical praise includes “the patience RoomRaccoon has shown has been outstanding,” and “their support team responds quickly to issues,” reflecting consistent positive experiences.
VIPS offers no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. The absence of user feedback on support means you’re relying on vendor claims rather than proven satisfaction.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon supports 88 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, RoomPriceGenie, Omniboost, and Sage. Its open API and extensive integrations streamline operations from channel management and PMS to revenue optimization and online marketing.
VIPS, with only 11 verified partners and no detailed list, offers far fewer integration options. This limited ecosystem could restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with essential tools, reducing flexibility and scalability.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.95/5 and NPS score of 9.54/10, based on 484 reviews, demonstrate high user satisfaction, especially among small hotel operators and B&Bs. Hotels like Buff and Fellow, The Glen Boutique, and Vive La Vie report increased RevPAR, streamlined operations, and faster onboarding.
In contrast, VIPS lacks recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment preferences. The strength and recency of RoomRaccoon’s reviews give it a clear advantage in proven customer approval.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon operates on a simple, transparent pricing model with a base fee of $1,000 per month, no implementation fees, and no free tier or trial. Its pricing is designed to be predictable regardless of property size, focusing on value.
VIPS does not publicly disclose its pricing structure, leaving potential customers uncertain about costs or value for money. This lack of transparency can be a concern when comparing overall value.
Not ideal if your hotel operates at a very large scale, requires highly specialized enterprise features, or has minimal technological infrastructure.
Not ideal if your hotel operates internationally, seeks a proven track record with recent reviews, or needs advanced automation features.
RoomRaccoon’s core difference is its proven track record, extensive features, and broad integrations, making it the more reliable choice for growth-oriented hotels. Its 484 recent reviews with a 4.95-star rating show it delivers consistent value and user satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with proven support, go with RoomRaccoon. It’s especially suitable if you’re seeking automation, deep integrations, and a system trusted by thousands globally.
VIPS, while potentially suitable for very small, regional properties with basic management needs, cannot match RoomRaccoon’s proven performance and extensive user validation. Without recent reviews or detailed feature insight, it’s a less certain choice for hotels aiming to scale confidently.
In summary: For most hotels, especially those looking for a reliable, feature-rich, and well-supported management system, RoomRaccoon stands out clearly. Its large, recent review base and comprehensive capabilities make it the safer, more future-proof investment.
Hotel Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, RoomRaccoon HMS and VIPS HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tariffs |
Showing top differences. 45 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users praise RoomRaccoon for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which reduces training time and allows smooth integration into dai... Many users praise RoomRaccoon for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which reduces training time and allows smooth integration into daily operations, thereby improving overall efficiency.
While some users commend the support team's responsiveness and expertise, others criticize the lack of after-sales care and response efficiency, indic... While some users commend the support team's responsiveness and expertise, others criticize the lack of after-sales care and response efficiency, indicating inconsistencies in customer service quality.
Users appreciate RoomRaccoon's ongoing development, including AI enhancements, which have contributed to improved sales and operational function, show... Users appreciate RoomRaccoon's ongoing development, including AI enhancements, which have contributed to improved sales and operational function, showcasing commitment to long-term adaptability.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews point out critical issues such as ineffective after-sales support and unresolved technical problems, significantly affecting user sati... Several reviews point out critical issues such as ineffective after-sales support and unresolved technical problems, significantly affecting user satisfaction and trust in the system.
The system's pricing is seen as steep by some users, especially those with seasonal businesses, impacting their decision-making despite the perceived... The system's pricing is seen as steep by some users, especially those with seasonal businesses, impacting their decision-making despite the perceived value of included features.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RoomRaccoon HMS and VIPS HMS share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. RoomRaccoon HMS offers 88 verified integration partners, while VIPS HMS offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon HMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RoomRaccoon HMS: No. VIPS HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RoomRaccoon has an HT Score of 86 and VIPS has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor