The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,509 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Canary Technologies shines when it comes to contactless check-in — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like PMS Integration and Network security.
Sezam24 shines in customer support and ROI .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,509 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1,508 | 1 |
After analyzing 1,509 verified reviews, Canary Technologies users most value its contactless check-in, guest messaging, upselling features, while Sezam24 users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Automatic Notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Credit Card and ID Verification
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 98 reviews | #16 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 1042 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 228 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 105 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 727 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 573 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 680 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 116 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 1308 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 65 reviews | #16 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #1 27 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 11 reviews | — |
Choosing between Canary Contactless Check-In and Sezam24 hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to modernize your check-in process, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and target hotel types. Canary offers a comprehensive guest management platform with a focus on automation, upselling, and security, while Sezam24 emphasizes quick, self-service check-in kiosks designed for efficiency. Which solution aligns better with your operational goals?
Both products address the desire for contactless check-in, but their approaches differ. Canary Technologies provides a full-fledged guest management platform that integrates with your existing PMS, offering features like digital authorization, guest messaging, and upselling, all within a modular setup. Sezam24, by contrast, focuses on self-service kiosks that enable guests to check in and receive room keys independently, bypassing front desk interactions entirely. Do you prefer a broad guest engagement system or a streamlined check-in kiosk?
Canary has a higher review count (1391 reviews) and recent feedback, making its data more robust and current. Sezam24 has just a single review but maintains a 5/5 rating, indicating strong satisfaction but limited data. If your hotel values ongoing support, proven adaptability, and a feature-rich solution, Canary’s larger user base and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice. Are you looking for a comprehensive platform or a straightforward check-in kiosk?
If your hotel needs a flexible, integrated guest management system capable of handling multiple touchpoints—from pre-arrival messaging to upselling—go with Canary Technologies. Its broad feature set, including PMS integration and security tools, suits hotels aiming to enhance guest experience while increasing revenue. If operational simplicity and quick deployment are your priorities, and you want a dedicated self-service kiosk solution, Sezam24 is the way to go, especially for small, budget-friendly properties.
Hotels that prioritize automation, guest communication, and revenue opportunities should choose Canary. Its versatility allows for tailored solutions across luxury, boutique, and branded hotels. Conversely, Sezam24 is ideal for hotels that want to implement quick, self-serve check-in kiosks with minimal fuss, especially in small or budget settings. Is your focus on a comprehensive guest engagement platform or a quick, standalone check-in solution?
Canary’s UI scores 4.82/5, and many reviews highlight its user-friendly interface that staff and guests find intuitive. Onboarding typically takes around 20 minutes, with numerous reviews praising the straightforward setup and quick staff adoption. Sezam24, rated 5/5 and supported by glowing reviews, emphasizes simplicity, with a focus on self-service kiosks that guests operate independently. Its dedicated kiosk interface is designed for ease of use, requiring minimal staff training.
While Canary offers a broader suite requiring some integration effort, its interface remains highly rated for simplicity. Sezam24’s focus on kiosk usability makes it the easier option for properties seeking fast implementation without extensive staff training. Edge: Sezam24.
Canary boasts 17 shared features with other guest management tools, plus 9 unique capabilities such as PMS integration, threat lifecycle management, automatic translations, and pre-arrival upselling. These allow for personalized guest interactions, security, compliance, and revenue boosts, making it a versatile platform.
Sezam24, with only one core product, offers a streamlined self-service check-in kiosk that allows guests to check in with their booking number and receive keys. It’s simple but lacks the advanced communication, upselling, or security features found in Canary. For feature depth and flexibility, Canary edges ahead, especially with its integrated guest engagement tools.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary’s support ratings stand at 4.69/5, with numerous reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hoteliers frequently mention the helpfulness of its customer service in troubleshooting integration issues and customizing the platform.
Sezam24, with a perfect 5/5 support rating based on limited reviews, appears highly satisfactory from current user feedback. However, the lack of recent or extensive reviews makes it harder to gauge ongoing support quality at scale. Given Canary’s larger, more recent review base, it demonstrates a proven track record of reliable support. Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary’s overall rating is 4.68/5 with 368 reviews in the last 6 months, indicating consistent, recent positive feedback. Hotels across various segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded properties, rate it highly, often citing its efficiency and revenue impact.
Sezam24, with a perfect 5/5 and only one review, cannot be reliably compared across a broad hotel base. The limited data suggests strong satisfaction but lacks the robustness of Canary’s recent, diverse feedback. Based on review volume and recency, Canary’s ratings are more indicative of ongoing performance.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $300, with no freemium, monthly, or implementation fees listed. Their straightforward pricing models make comparison easy; however, actual costs may vary based on additional modules or integrations.
Since both are similarly priced, your decision should depend on the value derived from features and support rather than cost alone.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or only needs a simple check-in kiosk.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced communication, upselling, or security features.
Canary Contactless Check-In provides a comprehensive, well-supported guest management system suited for hotels seeking to enhance the entire guest journey. Its extensive feature set and recent high ratings make it the more reliable choice for properties of all sizes aiming to boost revenue and guest satisfaction.
Sezam24 offers a straightforward, cost-effective self-service check-in kiosk ideal for small, budget-friendly hotels that want a quick fix with minimal setup. Its simplicity and high user satisfaction are appealing, but it lacks the breadth of features that Canary provides.
If your hotel values a flexible, integrated platform with proven support and recent reviews, go with Canary. If you need a quick, dedicated self-check-in solution for a small property, Sezam24 is a suitable alternative.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Canary Contactless Check-In and Sezam24 share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Compliance readiness | ||
| Network security | ||
| PCI compliance audit | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Penetration testing | ||
| Threat lifecycle management |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster.... Many users praised Canary's contactless check-in for its efficiency and convenience, allowing guests to avoid long lines and complete check-in faster. This feature integrates well with other tools to provide a seamless arrival experience for guests, although some users noted occasional technical glitches.
The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, d... The guest messaging feature was frequently highlighted for enhancing communication between guests and staff. It allows real-time interaction before, during, and after the stay, which helps resolve issues quickly and keeps guests informed. However, some reported that AI responses can occasionally misinterpret guest messages, requiring manual intervention.
Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users ap... Canary's upselling capabilities were noted for increasing hotel revenue by allowing guests to easily choose upgrades and additional services. Users appreciated the ability to offer tailored recommendations, leading to higher conversion rates. Some suggested further customization of upsell options by guest profile.
Where hoteliers push back
This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operati... This feature provides security benefits by verifying guest identities before arrival, reducing the risk of fraud. Reviewers stated it enhances operational efficiency but raised concerns about occasional data synchronization issues with PMS systems.
While many found Canary's platform user-friendly, several users reported issues with integrating it with their existing Property Management Systems (P... While many found Canary's platform user-friendly, several users reported issues with integrating it with their existing Property Management Systems (PMS) and suggested that enhancements in this area would further smooth operations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Canary Contactless Check-In and Sezam24 share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Canary Contactless Check-In offers 54 verified integration partners, while Sezam24 offers 9. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sezam24 leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Canary Contactless Check-In: No. Sezam24: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Canary Technologies has an HT Score of 100 and Sezam24 has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor