The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 570 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive/HCN shines in ease of use and guest experience — especially for motel properties (4.8/5), with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
SuitePad shines in ease of use and intuitive operation — especially for bed & breakfast properties (4.8/5).
Side-by-side ratings based on 570 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 197 | 373 |
After analyzing 570 verified reviews, Crave Interactive/HCN users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while SuitePad users highlight ease of use and intuitive operation, support and service responsiveness, guest communication and direct contact. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive operation
▾
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
+
Support and service responsiveness
▾
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
+
Guest communication and direct contact
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
+
Centralized digital hotel information
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
−
Hardware reliability and device lifespan
▾
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
−
Green Option and housekeeping reduction
▾
|
|
−
Integrations with PMS and other systems
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | #1 62 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 61 reviews | #1 192 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 71 reviews | #1 84 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 20 reviews | #2 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 86 reviews | #1 159 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 157 reviews | #1 174 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 51 reviews | #1 102 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | #1 24 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #5 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | #1 306 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | #1 9 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | #1 11 reviews |
Crave Interactive Tablets (HCN) and SuitePad are both in-room tablet solutions designed to enhance guest engagement and streamline hotel operations. They diverge primarily in their feature breadth and integration depth: Crave Interactive excels with a suite of 26 exclusive features focused on flexible guest ordering, payments, and multilingual support, while SuitePad emphasizes hardware robustness, extensive integrations, and sustainability features like its “Green Option.” Crave Interactive fits hotels seeking a comprehensive digital ordering and payment platform with deep customization, whereas SuitePad suits properties prioritizing seamless guest communication, environmental initiatives, and proven global adoption.
Both products address the core challenge of replacing printed directories and manual guest interactions with digital platforms that reduce front desk workload, improve guest satisfaction, and drive ancillary revenue. They enable guests to access hotel services, order room service, and receive real-time information, but their operational impact differs according to property needs and scale.
If you run a boutique or resort property that requires advanced ordering and payment capabilities integrated with your POS and payment systems, Crave Interactive’s 26 unique features—including Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, and multi-menu ordering—make it the superior choice. This is supported by 88 boutique and 114 resort hotel reviews averaging 4.6 and 4.5 stars respectively, demonstrating strong satisfaction in these segments.
If your hotel emphasizes guest communication, sustainability, and hardware reliability, especially in luxury or branded hotels with high guest turnover, SuitePad is recommended. It leads with 23 verified integrations (35% more than Crave’s 17), including key partners like Mews and FLEXIPASS for mobile key access, and supports features like the “Green Option” to waive daily housekeeping. With 180 luxury hotel reviews averaging 4.7 stars and 110 branded hotel reviews at 4.6 stars, SuitePad’s ratings reflect strong reception in these markets.
For airport or conference hotels, SuitePad’s 127 reviews averaging 4.7 stars indicate better fit, while Crave’s 58 reviews at 4.5 stars suggest a more modest presence. Note that Crave Interactive’s recent review volume has dropped 66% in the last six months, possibly signaling diminished current market traction or support responsiveness.
Both platforms score very similarly on ease of use and onboarding with Crave Interactive rating 4.5/5 ease of use and 4.5/5 onboarding, and SuitePad at 4.7/5 for both metrics. Reviewers consistently praise the intuitive, user-friendly interfaces of both products that require minimal guest training and simplify staff workflows. SuitePad’s slightly higher scores are supported by 26 recent reviews averaging 4.8/5 that describe straightforward content management and simple navigation.
Crave Interactive users highlight the platform’s “snappy” and thoughtful UX design, which enhances guest experience, while SuitePad is noted for its “easy-to-use entertainment and information tool” that reduces front desk queries. Neither product presents significant adoption challenges according to the data.
Edge: Even.
Crave Interactive Tablets (HCN) lead in feature count with 26 unique hotel-relevant capabilities absent in SuitePad. These include automated payments (Apple Pay, Google Pay), multi-menu ordering, contactless ordering, POS integration, tipping, upselling, scheduling orders, near-field contact (NFC), video concierge, and automatic translation for multilingual guests. These features enable hotels to digitize ordering and payment workflows fully, enhancing operational efficiency and upselling revenue opportunities.
SuitePad does not have any unique features beyond the shared 29 common attributes, but it differentiates through hardware design, including bespoke tablets with metal casing and magnetic charging, and software features like the “Green Option” for sustainability and integrated room phone and TV controls.
Operationally, Crave Interactive’s payment integrations reduce front desk billing time and errors, while its request management and guest messaging streamline service requests directly from the tablet. SuitePad’s sustainability option drives cost savings and guest engagement by allowing guests to opt out of daily housekeeping.
Edge: Crave Interactive Tablets (HCN).
Customer support ratings for Crave Interactive and SuitePad are 4.7/5 and 4.8/5 respectively, with onboarding scores closely aligned at 4.5/5 and 4.7/5. Reviewers of both platforms praise fast response times and helpful, proactive support teams. Crave’s support team has been commended for “super fast” and “excellent attitude” responses, while SuitePad’s support is described as “best support I have ever met in my career” and “next to us in every step” for issue resolution.
However, one Crave Interactive review reports “poor to terrible” customer service with “stonewalling silence,” indicating some inconsistency. SuitePad’s reviews mention occasional backend complexity but emphasize smooth onboarding and ongoing support.
Given the close ratings and similar positive feedback, support quality is comparable.
Edge: Even.
SuitePad has 23 verified integrations, 35% more than Crave Interactive’s 17. Both platforms share integrations with major systems like INTEREL, Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus, covering core PMS and distribution needs.
Crave Interactive’s unique partners include PressReader (digital newspapers), Book4Time (spa software), Quore (hotel operations), Kipsu (guest messaging), and ALICE (operations platform), enhancing guest service workflows and operational coordination. SuitePad’s unique integrations include FLEXIPASS for keyless mobile access, hotelkit (hotel operations), Customer Alliance (guest feedback), Unifocus (task management), Mews (PMS), and Hoist Group (in-room entertainment), supporting guest convenience and operational efficiency.
Hotels requiring advanced spa and operations management benefit more from Crave’s specialized integrations, while properties prioritizing mobile key access and guest feedback tools gain more from SuitePad’s ecosystem.
Edge: SuitePad.
SuitePad’s overall rating stands at 4.7/5 across 373 reviews, including 26 recent reviews averaging 4.8/5, demonstrating strong, current user satisfaction. Crave Interactive holds a 4.5/5 rating across 197 reviews, but with only 4 recent reviews in the last six months, making recent satisfaction less certain and indicating a 66% drop in review activity.
By segment, SuitePad leads in luxury hotels (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5 with 180 vs 160 reviews) and airport/conference hotels (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5 with 127 vs 58 reviews). Crave Interactive rates slightly higher in motels (4.8/5 vs 4.6/5) and boutique hotels (4.6/5 vs 4.7/5 is marginal).
SuitePad’s higher volume and recency of reviews across multiple segments make its ratings more representative and reliable.
Edge: Even.
Crave Interactive Tablets have a base price of $1,200.00 with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room fees and no implementation fee or trial period. SuitePad has a base price of $1,400.00 with similar pricing structures—no freemium, monthly fees, or implementation charges.
Pricing is similar, making cost differences negligible. Hotels should consider feature set and integration value alongside base price.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave Interactive Tablets (HCN) and SuitePad both serve the in-room tablet market but differ fundamentally in feature specialization and market focus. Crave Interactive leads with a richer feature set tailored to payment processing, contactless ordering, and multilingual capabilities, supporting hotels that want an all-encompassing digital ordering and guest engagement platform. SuitePad focuses on hardware quality, sustainability features, and a broader integration network, appealing to luxury and conference hotels aiming to enhance guest communication and operational efficiency.
Choose Crave Interactive Tablets if your property prioritizes integrated payments, advanced upselling through multi-menu and contactless ordering, and operational platforms integration, as evidenced by 26 unique features and strong ratings in boutique and resort segments. Its lower base price and web-based access also benefit hotels wanting flexible digital solutions.
Opt for SuitePad if your hotel values durable, bespoke hardware, sustainability with the “Green Option,” and a more extensive integration ecosystem that includes mobile key access and guest feedback tools. SuitePad’s higher review volume and recent ratings (4.8/5 last six months) validate its status as a trusted solution for luxury, branded, and airport hotels.
Note that Crave Interactive’s recent review activity has dropped 66%, from an average of 11.8 per six months to just 4 in the last half year, which may indicate emerging challenges or reduced market momentum. SuitePad maintains steady review volume, reflecting ongoing customer engagement and support. This trend should weigh into the decision alongside technical and operational considerations.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,400/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Content & Information
|
|
|
| Publication subscriptions (ex. newspapers, magazines) | ||
| Travel information | ||
| Apps & games | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Hotel facilities integrations | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| View bill & express check out | ||
| Secured web browsing | ||
| Group & conference offerings | ||
| Local city guides | ||
| News & weather | ||
| Digital Menus | ||
| Bedside alarm | ||
| TV & room controls | ||
| Digital directory | ||
|
▾
Messaging & Communication
|
|
|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Video Concierge | ||
| Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews) | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Guest messaging | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| Hotel facilities integrations | ||
| Housekeeping requests | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Bell services | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
| Late checkout | ||
| Bedside alarm | ||
|
▾
Upselling & Offers
|
|
|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Loyalty program management | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Dynamic pricing | ||
| POS & PMS Integration | ||
| Digital Menus | ||
|
▾
Guest Profiles
|
|
|
| Loyalty program management | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| View bill & express check out | ||
|
▾
Advertising
|
|
|
| Sponsorship opportunities |
We analyzed 10 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The Green Option has a dual impact, benefiting both the environment and our finances. It aligns perfectly with our sustainable and environmentally conscious direction that we shoul..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I saw SuitePad’s backend and knew immediately that it would be quick and easy to use for our team. The same goes for the guest-facing content. Its layout follows the style of moder..."
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
"SuitePad helped us achieve our goals of upgrading our service and successfully promoting our in-house offers. It also gives us space to keep trying new things all while providing t..."
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews describe SuitePad as simple, intuitive, and easy for both guests and staff to use, with straightforward navigation and low training effor... Many reviews describe SuitePad as simple, intuitive, and easy for both guests and staff to use, with straightforward navigation and low training effort. Hotels also appreciate that content and settings can be managed quickly in daily operations.
Many reviewers praise SuitePad's support team for fast responses, helpful problem-solving, and smooth onboarding or issue resolution. This strong serv... Many reviewers praise SuitePad's support team for fast responses, helpful problem-solving, and smooth onboarding or issue resolution. This strong service experience is often cited as a reason hotels feel confident rolling the product out and continuing to use it.
Hotels consistently say SuitePad improves direct communication with guests for updates, questions, and service requests, reducing pressure on the fron... Hotels consistently say SuitePad improves direct communication with guests for updates, questions, and service requests, reducing pressure on the front office and making stay management faster. Reviews mention real-time messaging, push notifications, and easier handling of guest needs as major operational benefits.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mention hardware concerns such as flickering screens, freezes, slow performance, warm devices, and tablets that stop working properly... Several reviews mention hardware concerns such as flickering screens, freezes, slow performance, warm devices, and tablets that stop working properly over time. Buyers should note that while the software is often praised, device durability and stability are recurring pain points.
The eco-friendly housekeeping skip feature is widely recognized for reducing paper use and helping hotels support sustainability goals. However, some... The eco-friendly housekeeping skip feature is widely recognized for reducing paper use and helping hotels support sustainability goals. However, some reviews say it can be confusing for guests and would benefit from clearer options or more flexibility in how housekeeping preferences are set.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN) and SuitePad share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN) offers 17 verified integration partners, while SuitePad offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SuitePad leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN): No. SuitePad: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive/HCN has an HT Score of 89 and SuitePad has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property