The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 563 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
SuitePad shines when it comes to ease of use and intuitive operation — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) .
Side-by-side ratings based on 563 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 369 |
After analyzing 563 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while SuitePad users highlight ease of use and intuitive operation, support and service responsiveness, guest communication and direct contact. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive operation
▾
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
+
Support and service responsiveness
▾
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
+
Guest communication and direct contact
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
+
Centralized digital hotel information
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
−
Hardware reliability and device lifespan
▾
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
−
Green Option and housekeeping reduction
▾
|
|
−
Integrations with PMS and other systems
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | #1 62 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 61 reviews | #1 192 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 71 reviews | #1 84 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 20 reviews | #2 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 86 reviews | #1 159 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 157 reviews | #1 174 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 51 reviews | #1 102 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | #1 24 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #5 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | #1 306 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | #1 9 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | #1 11 reviews |
Choosing the right in-room hotel tablet system can significantly influence your guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Crave Interactive and SuitePad are two leading options, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. Both platforms aim to streamline guest communication and enhance engagement, but they diverge in their feature sets, user experience, and support. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs and priorities.
Crave Interactive is known for its extensive feature set, robust integrations, and a broader global presence, while SuitePad emphasizes premium hardware, high guest satisfaction scores, and a focus on sustainability. Given the current market data, which product offers the most value for your hotel?
Both Crave and SuitePad aim to elevate your guest experience with in-room tablets, but they serve slightly different hotel types and operational philosophies. Crave leans toward hotels seeking deep customization and a versatile set of features like multi-lingual support, digital menus, and integrated payments, making it ideal for upscale properties with complex service offerings. SuitePad, on the other hand, excels in delivering a sleek, user-friendly interface with a focus on communication, upselling, and eco-friendly practices, suited for properties aiming for simplicity and sustainability.
Crave’s strength lies in its extensive integrations and feature count—over 26 unique features—targeting hotels that want comprehensive control and advanced options. SuitePad offers a more curated experience with 29 shared features and a focus on ease of use, guest engagement, and safety, such as its no-camera policy. Given these differences, your choice depends on whether your hotel values feature depth or streamlined simplicity.
Are you looking for a platform with extensive customization and advanced integrations, or one that prioritizes intuitive design and guest safety?
If your hotel operates in a luxury or boutique segment that values high customization, multi-language support, and payment integrations, Crave is the better choice. Its feature set includes in-room ordering, guest messaging, web-app access, and NFC, making it suitable for hotels that want to offer a versatile, multi-functional guest experience.
Conversely, if your hotel emphasizes guest communication, sustainability, and quick implementation, SuitePad is preferable. It’s rated higher for ease of use, with a 4.68/5 UI rating, and offers robust in-room features like booking, hotel directory, and TV control. For properties focused on high guest engagement and simplicity, SuitePad’s reputation for high user satisfaction makes it stand out.
For hotels seeking a feature-rich, highly customizable system, Crave is ideal. If your goal is intuitive operation with a focus on communication and sustainability, SuitePad is the recommended choice.
Crave’s platform scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, with reviews noting the intuitive interface and seamless guest interactions. Its onboarding process is rated 4.37/5, which suggests solid but potentially room for improvement in staff training and implementation.
SuitePad edges out slightly with a 4.68/5 UI rating and onboarding score of 4.65/5, with users praising its simplicity, quick setup, and minimal learning curve. Many hotel staff and guests find SuitePad’s interface more approachable, leading to faster staff adoption and higher guest satisfaction.
Edge: SuitePad.
Crave offers 26 features exclusive to its platform, including in-room payments, request management, web-app access, QR code integration, contactless ordering, and POS system integration. Its extensive feature list supports complex service environments and upselling strategies.
SuitePad provides a slightly smaller but highly curated set of 29 shared features, including guest directory, booking, room control, and eco-friendly options like Green Option. Its features are tailored for straightforward, engaging guest interactions, with a focus on communication and sustainability.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support scores 4.6/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and support team’s effectiveness during setup and ongoing operations. Some users, however, mention occasional delays in content updates and limited customization in support.
SuitePad outperforms slightly with a support rating of 4.84/5, and reviews highlight their proactive communication, quick response times, and dedicated onboarding assistance. Many users describe SuitePad’s support as a key factor in their positive experience.
Edge: SuitePad.
Crave boasts 17 verified integrations, including partners like PressReader, Book4Time, Kipsu, and Google Pay. Its integrations support a broad range of hotel operations, from guest entertainment to payments.
SuitePad has 23 verified partners, including FLEXIPASS, Mews, hotelkit, and Beekeeper, offering extensive options for property management, guest communication, and access control. Its high number of integrations provides flexibility for diverse hotel ecosystems.
Edge: SuitePad.
SuitePad leads with an overall rating of 4.78/5, based on 290 reviews, and a recent review count of 13 in the last six months. Hoteliers across segments like luxury and city center properties express high satisfaction with its ease of use and guest engagement.
Crave scores 4.6/5 from 147 reviews, with a focus on its feature depth and customization. However, its fewer recent reviews and slightly lower overall rating suggest SuitePad currently enjoys a higher user approval.
Edge: SuitePad.
Crave’s pricing starts at $1,200 for a base package, with no mention of monthly fees or implementation charges—indicating a straightforward licensing model. SuitePad’s base price is $1,400, also without additional implementation fees, but with a slight premium.
While both are similarly priced, SuitePad’s performance-based pricing model in some cases offers more flexibility, especially for hotels wary of upfront costs. Pricing details should be confirmed directly to tailor the best plan for your property.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks a simplified, easy-to-deploy system or has limited staff capacity for complex integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires deep customization, advanced integrations, or a highly technical platform with extensive backend controls.
Crave Interactive is a versatile, feature-rich platform that suits hotels needing extensive customization, multi-lingual support, and deep integration. It’s best for larger, upscale properties with dedicated technical teams and complex service needs.
SuitePad offers a sleek, user-friendly experience with excellent guest engagement and support for sustainability initiatives. Its high ratings, ease of use, and extensive integrations make it a top choice for hotels wanting quick deployment and high guest satisfaction.
If your hotel values comprehensive features and flexibility, Crave is the clear winner. For properties prioritizing simplicity, guest experience, and support, SuitePad is the stronger candidate.
In conclusion, SuitePad's higher recent review count, user ratings, and support quality position it as the leading choice for most hoteliers focused on guest engagement and operational ease. However, if your hotel demands a highly customizable system with advanced features, Crave will serve you well—just be prepared for a steeper learning curve and potentially longer setup times.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $1,400/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Content & Information
|
|
|
| Publication subscriptions (ex. newspapers, magazines) | ||
| Travel information | ||
| Apps & games | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Hotel facilities integrations | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| View bill & express check out | ||
| Secured web browsing | ||
| Group & conference offerings | ||
| Local city guides | ||
| News & weather | ||
| Digital Menus | ||
| Bedside alarm | ||
| TV & room controls | ||
| Digital directory | ||
|
▾
Messaging & Communication
|
|
|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Video Concierge | ||
| Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews) | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Guest messaging | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| Hotel facilities integrations | ||
| Housekeeping requests | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Bell services | ||
| Digital concierge | ||
| Late checkout | ||
| Bedside alarm | ||
|
▾
Upselling & Offers
|
|
|
| Guest Marketing | ||
| Loyalty program management | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| In-room dining ordering | ||
| Dynamic pricing | ||
| POS & PMS Integration | ||
| Digital Menus | ||
|
▾
Guest Profiles
|
|
|
| Loyalty program management | ||
| Restaurant reservations | ||
| View bill & express check out | ||
|
▾
Advertising
|
|
|
| Sponsorship opportunities |
We analyzed 10 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The Green Option has a dual impact, benefiting both the environment and our finances. It aligns perfectly with our sustainable and environmentally conscious direction that we shoul..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I saw SuitePad’s backend and knew immediately that it would be quick and easy to use for our team. The same goes for the guest-facing content. Its layout follows the style of moder..."
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
"SuitePad helped us achieve our goals of upgrading our service and successfully promoting our in-house offers. It also gives us space to keep trying new things all while providing t..."
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews describe SuitePad as simple, intuitive, and easy for both guests and staff to use, with straightforward navigation and low training effor... Many reviews describe SuitePad as simple, intuitive, and easy for both guests and staff to use, with straightforward navigation and low training effort. Hotels also appreciate that content and settings can be managed quickly in daily operations.
Many reviewers praise SuitePad's support team for fast responses, helpful problem-solving, and smooth onboarding or issue resolution. This strong serv... Many reviewers praise SuitePad's support team for fast responses, helpful problem-solving, and smooth onboarding or issue resolution. This strong service experience is often cited as a reason hotels feel confident rolling the product out and continuing to use it.
Hotels consistently say SuitePad improves direct communication with guests for updates, questions, and service requests, reducing pressure on the fron... Hotels consistently say SuitePad improves direct communication with guests for updates, questions, and service requests, reducing pressure on the front office and making stay management faster. Reviews mention real-time messaging, push notifications, and easier handling of guest needs as major operational benefits.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mention hardware concerns such as flickering screens, freezes, slow performance, warm devices, and tablets that stop working properly... Several reviews mention hardware concerns such as flickering screens, freezes, slow performance, warm devices, and tablets that stop working properly over time. Buyers should note that while the software is often praised, device durability and stability are recurring pain points.
The eco-friendly housekeeping skip feature is widely recognized for reducing paper use and helping hotels support sustainability goals. However, some... The eco-friendly housekeeping skip feature is widely recognized for reducing paper use and helping hotels support sustainability goals. However, some reviews say it can be confusing for guests and would benefit from clearer options or more flexibility in how housekeeping preferences are set.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN) and SuitePad share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN) offers 17 verified integration partners, while SuitePad offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SuitePad leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive Tablets (acq by HCN): No. SuitePad: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 89 and SuitePad has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property