The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 39 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus stands out with exclusive features like Online payments.
Thynk shines in centralized sales, crm, and event management — especially for luxury properties (4.8/5).
Side-by-side ratings based on 39 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 9 | 30 |
After analyzing 39 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while Thynk users highlight centralized sales, crm, and event management, rfps, proposals, and quote generation, reporting, dashboards, and forecasting. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Centralized sales, CRM, and event management
▾
|
|
|
+
RFPs, proposals, and quote generation
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting, dashboards, and forecasting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integrations with PMS, CRM, and other systems
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Usability and workflow complexity
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and property-specific flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
Availability, calendar, and room block management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #9 0 reviews | #11 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | #9 4 reviews | #11 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 2 reviews | #5 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #7 1 reviews | #5 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 4 reviews | #8 6 reviews |
| Luxury | #8 4 reviews | #10 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 8 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #3 1 reviews | #4 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 5 reviews | #10 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #9 2 reviews | #5 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #8 0 reviews | — |
| Middle East | — | #3 1 reviews |
Amadeus and Thynk both address the need for efficient RFP and proposal management in hotels, but they serve different operational styles and hotel segments. Amadeus excels where integration with an established Sales & Catering platform like Delphi matters and where proposal customization and automation of pricing matter. Thynk stands out as a modern, Salesforce-based solution focusing on centralized lead capture and swift, branded eProposal generation.
Both products solve the core problem of reducing manual data entry and accelerating the sales cycle by automating proposal generation. This reduces the risk of lost leads and slow responses, critical in high-volume or complex RFP environments. However, Amadeus offers features like dynamic pricing and online payments that can influence deal closure, while Thynk’s strength lies in its ease of use and integration with Cvent and Salesforce ecosystems.
If your hotel operates multiple properties or venues already using Amadeus Sales & Catering (Delphi), choose Amadeus eProposal to avoid data re-entry and leverage dynamic pricing and automated responses, as supported by its 4.1/5 rating across 9 reviews mostly from branded and luxury hotels. Its integration into a broader sales ecosystem fits well with hotels needing complex contract management and pricing flexibility.
If your property prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and value for money, and your sales team relies on Salesforce or Cvent, Thynk is preferable. Its 4.4/5 rating over 22 reviews, with 9 recent ones, reflects strong satisfaction in city center hotels, resorts, and luxury segments across a broader geographic footprint. For hotels seeking a centralized, fast lead-to-proposal workflow without extensive legacy systems, Thynk offers more modern usability and support.
Both products lack extensive case studies but Thynk’s recent growth in review volume (9 in last six months versus an average of 3.3) indicates active development and customer engagement, while Amadeus has no recent reviews, suggesting more stable but less current user feedback.
Amadeus scores 3.4/5 for ease of use and 3.3/5 for onboarding across 9 reviews, with users noting the interface can be less intuitive and training resources limited. One reviewer criticized the lack of training videos and a cumbersome support ticket system. In contrast, Thynk scores 4.2/5 ease of use and 4.5/5 onboarding from 22 reviews, with multiple users praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding courses like Thynk university.
Despite Amadeus’s integration benefits, users highlight a steeper learning curve and less straightforward workflows. Thynk reviewers emphasize quick adaptation by sales teams and the ability to customize dashboards, which eases adoption for diverse roles.
Edge: Even.
Amadeus includes four features not found in Thynk: response management, automated responses, dynamic pricing, and online payments. These features automate key sales processes, allowing sales teams to generate proposals that adjust pricing dynamically and accept payments directly, reducing manual follow-up and improving cash flow management.
Thynk offers no unique features beyond the seven shared with Amadeus, focusing instead on integration with Salesforce and Cvent to automate inquiry routing and branded proposal creation. Its strength lies in workflow efficiency rather than feature breadth.
For hotels requiring sophisticated pricing strategies or direct payment capture during proposal stages, Amadeus offers operational advantages. Hotels prioritizing simple, centralized lead management and branded proposal workflows will find Thynk sufficient.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus scores 2.7/5 for customer support and 3.3/5 for onboarding, reflecting mixed reviews. Some users praise knowledgeable account representatives who help maximize software use, but others report slow support turnaround and unhelpful responses, especially for urgent issues.
Thynk scores 4.6/5 for customer support and 4.5/5 onboarding. Reviewers frequently commend the responsiveness and collaborative problem-solving attitude of the Thynk team, citing specific team members by name as key to smooth rollouts and ongoing improvements.
While Amadeus provides some strong individual support experiences, the broader pattern favors Thynk’s support quality and onboarding efficiency.
Edge: Even.
Amadeus connects to 107 verified partners, including major hotel software providers like Priority Software, Profitroom, and RevControl, beyond shared integrations with Cendyn, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews. Its extensive integration network suits hotels with complex tech stacks requiring multiple operational systems to communicate.
Thynk has 13 verified partners, including Stripe and Proposales, alongside shared partners like Cendyn and Oracle Hospitality. Thynk’s smaller but focused integration list fits hotels leveraging Salesforce and Cvent, prioritizing CRM and event management connectivity.
Hotels with diverse or legacy systems benefit from Amadeus’s broader ecosystem, while those standardizing on Salesforce technology will find Thynk’s integrations adequate.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus holds a 4.1/5 overall rating from 9 reviews, with no recent reviews in the last 6 months, suggesting ratings may not reflect current product status. Its highest ratings come from luxury hotels (4.9/5) and city center hotels (4.7/5), but ratings are mixed in other segments.
Thynk has a higher overall rating of 4.4/5 from 22 reviews, including 9 recent reviews indicating ongoing user satisfaction. Luxury hotels rate it 4.8/5, city center hotels 4.5/5, and resorts 4.6/5, showing broad approval across key hotel types. The recent review increase suggests active product improvement and customer engagement.
Edge: Even.
Amadeus charges a base price of $1,000 with no implementation fee or trial, positioning it as a premium product likely targeting larger hotel groups or venues. Its pricing does not scale per room or offer freemium options.
Thynk’s base price is $600, also without implementation fee or trial. This lower entry cost aligns with its appeal to smaller or mid-sized operations seeking a cost-effective sales solution.
Neither product publishes monthly flat or per-room pricing, limiting granular cost comparison. Amadeus is more expensive upfront, which may be justified by integration depth and feature set.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus and Thynk both streamline the RFP and proposal process, but Amadeus targets hotels with established sales and catering systems who need dynamic pricing and payment options, while Thynk focuses on ease of use and Salesforce integration for faster lead management. Amadeus delivers a feature-rich environment that suits larger, branded hotels with complex needs; Thynk offers a modern, intuitive platform favored by city center and resort hotels seeking rapid onboarding and strong support.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel portfolio depends on deep integration with Amadeus Delphi, needs dynamic pricing, and values extensive third-party connections—advantages supported by its 107 verified integrations and unique pricing features. Choose Thynk if you want a lower-cost, easier-to-use solution with strong customer support and Salesforce-based lead management, reflected in its higher ease of use (4.2/5) and onboarding ratings (4.5/5) across 22 reviews including recent feedback.
RFPs & Proposal Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Proposals, Contracts & Signatures
|
|
|
| Digital Signatures | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Templates Library | ||
|
▾
Online Bookings
|
|
|
| Real-time live availability | ||
| Website Booking Engine | ||
|
▾
Payments & Invoicing
|
|
|
| Online payments | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| Templates Library | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
|
▾
CRM & Messaging
|
|
|
| Response Management | ||
| Team Collaboration | ||
| Read Receipts & Alerts | ||
| Templates Library | ||
| Automated Responses | ||
|
▾
Notifications
|
|
|
| Read Receipts & Alerts | ||
| Team Collaboration |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users repeatedly praise Thynk for bringing corporate accounts, group business, meetings/events, CRM, and sales opportunities into one hotel sales hub.... Users repeatedly praise Thynk for bringing corporate accounts, group business, meetings/events, CRM, and sales opportunities into one hotel sales hub. They say this improves coordination across teams, gives better visibility into business opportunities, and creates a more connected commercial workflow.
Many reviewers highlight how Thynk accelerates the creation of proposals and price quotes, often in just minutes. They like the ability to manage RFPs... Many reviewers highlight how Thynk accelerates the creation of proposals and price quotes, often in just minutes. They like the ability to manage RFPs and proposals in one place, with customizable layouts and templates that help teams respond faster and more consistently.
Users frequently mention Thynk’s reporting and dashboard capabilities as a strength, especially for tracking pipeline, conversion, sales performance,... Users frequently mention Thynk’s reporting and dashboard capabilities as a strength, especially for tracking pipeline, conversion, sales performance, and forecasting. Some also note its value for revenue analysis, such as event revenue maximization and performance visibility across hotels.
Where hoteliers push back
A common criticism is that some workflows are too complicated, especially for editing details, filling forms, and updating repeated event information.... A common criticism is that some workflows are too complicated, especially for editing details, filling forms, and updating repeated event information. Reviewers also mention a learning curve, confusing search results, and a need for more intuitive, customizable processes.
Users want more flexibility to adapt Thynk to property-specific requirements, particularly for forms, workflows, proposals, and contract handling. Whi... Users want more flexibility to adapt Thynk to property-specific requirements, particularly for forms, workflows, proposals, and contract handling. While the system is appreciated for its core structure, reviewers say deeper customization would make it fit hotel operations more precisely.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal) and Thynk Lead & Proposal Management share many core RFPs & Proposal Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal) offers 107 verified integration partners, while Thynk Lead & Proposal Management offers 13. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Thynk Lead & Proposal Management leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 3.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal): No. Thynk Lead & Proposal Management: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and Thynk has 94. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property