The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 897 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ASA Hotelsoftware shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews shines when it comes to customization and flexibility — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 897 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 886 |
After analyzing 897 verified reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware users most value its , while Mews users highlight customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, onboarding and support experience. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing Complexity and Reporting Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #49 4 reviews | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 6 reviews | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #61 1 reviews | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #27 11 reviews | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between ASA Hotelsoftware and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and strategic priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. ASA offers a more traditional, feature-rich platform with a strong presence in Europe, while Mews excels in cloud-based automation, integrations, and global reach. How do you decide which fits your hotel best?
ASA Hotelsoftware is a longstanding, award-winning solution with over 11 reviews in the last six months and a near-perfect overall rating of 5/5, making it highly endorsed by current users. It provides a comprehensive suite of modules, including unique features like Spa & Wellness and mobile device notes, appealing to resorts and larger properties. Conversely, Mews, with 758 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, is praised for its modern, cloud-native approach, extensive integrations, and scalable platform suited for diverse hotel types globally. Do you prioritize a proven, feature-heavy system or a flexible, innovative cloud platform?
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, on-premise solution with specific modules like spa management and detailed staff task features, ASA is the better fit. It’s favored by resorts and properties that need robust operational tools and are comfortable with traditional software deployment. But if you need a cloud-based platform with over 336 integrations, automation, and a global presence, Mews offers faster scalability and easier integration with third-party apps. For hotels seeking long-term growth and automation, Mews is the clearer choice.
ASA Hotelsoftware scores 4.73/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its straightforward, logical interface and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate its simple navigation, even for staff unfamiliar with hotel management systems. However, some note that implementing complex pricing models can be challenging, which might slow staff adoption initially. Mews slightly edges ahead with a 4.7/5 rating, praised for its intuitive, modern design and seamless cloud access, minimizing onboarding hurdles and encouraging quick staff adoption. Edge: Mews.
ASA boasts 43 shared features plus three exclusive modules: Spa & Wellness, On-premise deployment, and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks. Its unique features cater well to resorts or hotels with specialized needs. In contrast, Mews offers 16 features exclusive to its platform, including Booking Engine, Guest CRM, Channel Manager, and integrated CRS, supporting automation and guest engagement. While ASA covers more hotel-specific functions, Mews leads with automation and third-party connectivity. Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
ASA Hotelsoftware is highly rated at 4.73/5, with reviews praising its dedicated contact persons and ongoing support despite constant evolution. Users say, “ASA support is responsive and always available,” which fosters confidence in their operational continuity. Mews scores 4.27/5, with positive comments about its onboarding and ongoing support, but some reviews mention occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Given the recent reviews and higher ratings, ASA support currently outperforms Mews. Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
Mews's marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, with 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and guest apps. ASA, with 49 verified partners, covers essential integrations but lags behind Mews in breadth. Shared partners like Onity and RateBoard are common, but Mews’s extensive ecosystem enables more flexible tech stacks. For hotels prioritizing deep integration options, Mews is the better choice. Edge: Mews.
ASA’s ratings are stellar, with a 5/5 overall rating and a 10/5 NPS score based on recent reviews, mainly from resorts and larger properties in Europe. Mews, with a 4.62/5 rating and a 9.12/5 NPS, is highly regarded globally, especially among independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels. Recent feedback indicates Mews’s ease of use and automation resonate strongly. For overall user satisfaction, ASA holds a slight edge due to its higher ratings. Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
ASA’s base price is $1,000 with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its traditional licensing model. Mews charges $900 as a base fee, also without a free trial, but its cloud-based nature means more scalable pricing options might be available through custom quotes. Both platforms lack transparent tiered pricing publicly, so costs depend on property size and modules. For straightforward budgeting, Mews’s slightly lower entry point may appeal, but detailed quotes are recommended.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ASA Hotelsoftware is a solid choice for established, larger properties or resorts that need extensive operational modules and prefer local deployments. Its high review scores and specialized features make it suitable for hotels with complex management needs. Mews, on the other hand, is ideal for modern, tech-savvy hotels aiming for automation, quick scalability, and broad integrations, especially in dynamic, multi-property portfolios.
Choose ASA if your hotel values detailed local control and comprehensive modules. Opt for Mews if you prioritize cloud flexibility, automation, and a wide ecosystem that supports innovation. For most hotels today, Mews’s recent growth, high reviews, and rapid feature evolution make it the stronger pick.
This detailed comparison should help you confidently decide which PMS aligns best with your hotel’s goals and operational model.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASA Hotel Software and Mews PMS share 43 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial s... The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial setup efficiency. The support team's responsiveness has improved over time, enhancing problem resolution and user satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could pr... While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could provide better insights and flexibility for users managing financial operations.
Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynami... Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynamic pricing tools and advanced analytics, especially in multi-property operations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASA Hotel Software and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASA Hotel Software offers 49 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASA Hotel Software leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASA Hotel Software: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ASA Hotelsoftware has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor