The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 45 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ASA Hotelsoftware shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Mobile App.
Shiji Group shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 45 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 34 |
After analyzing 45 verified reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #49 4 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 6 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #61 1 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #39 2 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #27 11 reviews | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency and guest satisfaction. ASA Hotelsoftware and Shiji Daylight PMS both aim to streamline operations, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. ASA is a well-established, user-friendly solution with a high satisfaction rating, while Shiji offers a broader array of features suited to larger, multi-property hotel groups. Your choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational needs.
Both ASA Hotelsoftware and Shiji Daylight PMS address core hotel management needs such as reservations, check-in/out, and guest data management. ASA excels in simplicity, ease of use, and customer satisfaction, reflected in its 5/5 overall rating from 11 recent reviews, including a perfect 10/5 NPS score. In contrast, Shiji, with 32 reviews, has a near-zero overall rating and a lower NPS of 8.94/5, indicating less recent positive feedback.
While ASA’s interface is praised for its intuitive design and staff adoption, Shiji’s strength lies in its extensive feature set and scalability. If your hotel prioritizes straightforward management with high user satisfaction, ASA is the more reliable pick. However, if you need a system rich in advanced features for multiple properties, Shiji’s broader capabilities may appeal, despite its lower review scores.
The key question: which system aligns more with your operational complexity and guest service goals?
If your hotel is a resort, inn, or boutique property seeking a simple yet effective PMS, ASA Hotelsoftware is the clear choice. Its high ease-of-use rating and positive reviews from resort and inn operators highlight its suitability for hotels prioritizing staff adoption and straightforward management.
Conversely, if your hotel operates across multiple locations or is part of a larger group requiring detailed reporting, advanced guest profiling, and extensive integrations, Shiji Daylight PMS is preferable. Its 58 unique features, including centralized guest profiles and online check-in, serve larger operations well, although its lower review score suggests it may need ongoing improvement.
For small to medium hotels valuing high satisfaction and ease, ASA wins. For larger, multi-property groups needing comprehensive features and automation, Shiji is the better fit.
ASA Hotelsoftware boasts a user rating of 4.73/5 and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Staff find it easy to learn and adopt, with some reviewers citing a learning curve as minimal, enhancing staff productivity quickly.
Shiji Daylight PMS, with a 4.63/5 ease-of-use rating, also receives positive feedback for its user-friendly design and training materials. Users report that its interface is accessible, and the system’s automation features help reduce training time.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware. Its higher user rating and more recent positive reviews reinforce its reputation for simplicity.
Shiji offers a significantly larger set of features, with 58 unique capabilities versus ASA’s 6 exclusive features. These include online check-in/out, guest messaging, automated reminders, and integrated CRS, which are essential for larger or more complex hotels.
ASA’s unique features focus on wellness, revenue management, and mobile app integration, making it ideal for resorts and boutique hotels that need specific modules without the need for extensive customization.
Edge: Shiji Group. Its broad feature set supports complex, multi-property operations and digital guest services.
ASA Hotelsoftware maintains a high support score of 4.73/5 and recent reviews praising its responsiveness and personal contact. Guests mention that ASA’s support team is always available and helpful, which is critical for smooth daily operations.
Shiji Group’s support scores slightly lower at 4.53/5. Users appreciate the comprehensive training materials and support team, but some report delays or the need for more reliable system speed.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware. Its higher recent support ratings and positive feedback make it the more dependable choice.
Shiji’s integration ecosystem spans 64 verified partners, including global systems like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Amadeus, giving it an edge in connecting with third-party solutions. ASA connects with 49 partners, including notable ones like HotelNetSolutions and Vertical Booking, but its ecosystem is less extensive.
Shared integrations include key partners such as Fairmas and Vingcard, ensuring basic interoperability. If your hotel relies on extensive third-party systems, Shiji’s broader integration network may be advantageous.
Edge: Shiji Group. Its larger and more diverse set of integration options supports complex, multi-system operations.
ASA receives a perfect 5/5 rating from all 11 reviews, with comments emphasizing its balance of ease and versatility. Its recent review activity (1 review in the last 6 months) confirms ongoing satisfaction.
Shiji’s 32 reviews reflect a wide user base but a much lower overall rating of 0/5, with many users citing system speed and customization limitations. The recent review activity is absent, suggesting less current positive feedback.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware. Its higher, recent review scores underscore its superior user satisfaction.
ASA’s pricing starts at $1,000 with no mention of hidden fees, implementation costs, or monthly charges. Shiji’s base price is $1,200, also without trial options or additional fees.
While both are similarly priced, ASA’s slightly lower base price and straightforward pricing model make it easier to evaluate and budget for.
The core difference lies in scope: ASA offers a straightforward, highly-rated PMS suited for small to medium properties, emphasizing ease of use and guest satisfaction. Shiji provides a robust, feature-rich system designed for larger operations that need extensive integrations and automation.
Choose ASA if your hotel values simplicity, high staff adoption, and recent positive reviews. Opt for Shiji if you operate a multi-property group requiring advanced features, integrations, and detailed guest management.
If your hotel is a small resort or boutique, ASA will likely meet your needs better. For larger, growing hotel groups or chains, Shiji’s capabilities might justify its higher complexity and wider feature set.
This comparison should guide your decision: prioritize ASA if recent reviews and user satisfaction are your top criteria. If your hotel’s scale and operational complexity demand more advanced tools, Shiji offers a comprehensive platform — but be aware of its current lower review ratings and ongoing development needs.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASA Hotel Software and Shiji Daylight PMS share 40 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASA Hotel Software and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASA Hotel Software offers 49 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASA Hotel Software leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASA Hotel Software: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ASA Hotelsoftware has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor