The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 319 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and ROI , with exclusive features like On premise and Native Email Marketing.
innRoad shines when it comes to customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 319 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 292 |
After analyzing 319 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while innRoad users highlight customer support, reporting and revenue management, booking engine and ota integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
+
Reporting and Revenue Management
▾
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
+
Booking Engine and OTA Integration
▾
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
+
Tape Chart
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
−
System Glitches
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
−
Credit Card Processing
▾
|
|
−
Mobile Compatibility and App
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #6 179 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #16 47 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #19 2 reviews | #9 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #12 96 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #15 45 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #16 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #48 1 reviews | #13 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | #3 275 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #34 5 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | #39 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #34 0 reviews |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs solutions that streamline operations, boost revenue, and offer reliable support. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and innRoad both aim to meet these needs, but their core differences are significant. ASI is a long-established, feature-rich system with a large global presence, while innRoad focuses on ease of use, integrations, and a strong revenue track record. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both ASI and innRoad aim to simplify hotel management, but they differ in scope and focus. ASI offers a comprehensive platform with detailed reporting, multi-property management, and extensive integrations, suited for hotels prioritizing control and analytics. innRoad, on the other hand, emphasizes user-friendliness, quick onboarding, and revenue growth through features like a booking engine and OTA connectivity. Is your team looking for depth and customizability or ease and rapid results?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-lingual PMS with advanced tools for reservations, rate management, and reporting, go with ASI. This product is suited for larger operations or those seeking extensive customization and multi-property management. Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes a straightforward interface, rapid onboarding, and proven revenue increases—like a 35% boost in direct bookings—innRoad is the better fit. It’s ideal for small to midsize hotels focused on growth and operational simplicity.
Based on user ratings, ASI scores 4.88/5 for ease of use, while innRoad scores slightly lower at 4.49/5. ASI’s interface is praised for its clarity and straightforward workflows, making daily operations and staff training smoother. InnRoad users appreciate its intuitive Tape Chart and simple setup, but some mention glitches and slower mobile experience. For staff adoption and minimal learning curve, edge: ASI.
ASI offers 6 features exclusive to its platform, including native email marketing, ID scanning, and rules-based room assignments, adding depth for complex operations. innRoad has 15 unique features like a booking engine, revenue management, and a property management system, enhancing direct booking capabilities and automation. Both have 41 shared features, but innRoad’s broader suite of integrations and tools tailored for revenue growth give it a slight edge.
Both products are supported by highly-rated teams, with ASI support rated 4.73/5 and innRoad at 4.54/5. ASI users commend its quick issue resolution and professional assistance, though some report delays. InnRoad’s support is praised for its availability and helpfulness, especially for onboarding, but some reviews note occasional slow responses. Edge: ASI, given its higher overall rating and more recent positive feedback, especially in onboarding.
innRoad outperforms with 34 verified integrations, including popular OTAs and payment systems like QuickBooks, M3, and Revinate. ASI offers 18 verified partners, including SiteMinder and RoomPriceGenie, but fewer total options. For hotels relying heavily on third-party integrations to automate and expand their operations, innRoad’s broader ecosystem gives it the advantage. Edge: innRoad.
Considering recent reviews, innRoad’s average rating of 4.7/5 stands out, especially from small and independent hotels. ASI, with an overall rating of 0/5 but a high HT score of 77.26, is evaluated more on technical depth than user sentiment. InnRoad’s reviews highlight ease of use and revenue improvements, while ASI’s focus is on stability and detailed analytics. For current user satisfaction, edge: innRoad.
Both systems are priced at a base fee of $300 monthly, with no additional implementation or hidden charges. This parity makes cost less of a differentiator, focusing your decision instead on features, support, and usability.
At its core, ASI is a robust, feature-heavy PMS designed for hotels that need control, detailed analytics, and multi-property management. innRoad excels in user-friendliness, quick deployment, and delivering measurable revenue growth, particularly for small-to-mid-sized hotels.
Choose ASI if your hotel demands a highly customizable, scalable platform with deep integration options, especially if you operate multiple properties or need detailed reporting tools. It’s best for larger, more complex operations that require stability and control.
Pick innRoad if your hotel values ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a proven track record of increasing direct bookings and revenue. Its broader integration ecosystem and positive recent reviews make it ideal for properties seeking quick wins and operational simplicity.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and active customer feedback count most, innRoad’s 4.7/5 rating and 238 reviews make it the stronger choice for today’s hoteliers. Its focus on revenue-enhancing features and user-friendly design align closely with the needs of most small to midsize hotels.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and innRoad share 41 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reminders | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Group Booking Engine | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Property Management System | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, u... While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, users find the 24/7 support invaluable for troubleshooting any issues.
The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dy... The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dynamically adjust room rates and increase profitability. Some users suggest further report customization for more tailored insights.
Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to si... Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to significant revenue boosts for many properties. However, issues were noted with third-party integrations sometimes losing details.
Where hoteliers push back
Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system perf... Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system performing slowly at times. These issues occasionally impact booking and check-in processes.
InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes.... InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes. The inclusion of PCI compliance and secure payment processing is appreciated.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and innRoad share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while innRoad offers 34. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. innRoad: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and innRoad has 31. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor