The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 215 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Dack shines .
STAY shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 215 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 215 |
After analyzing 215 verified reviews, Dack users most value its , while STAY users highlight guest experience optimization, mobile and user experience, operational efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Dack |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Experience Optimization
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile and User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Service
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
CMS and Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 89 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 24 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 77 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 88 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 112 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #7 2 reviews |
Choosing the right guest app can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Dack by Dack and STAY Guest App aim to improve guest communication and streamline services, but they approach these goals differently. Dack appears more suited for short-term rental businesses with a focus on operational management, while STAY offers a broader suite of guest-facing features tailored for hotels. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Dack presents itself as a property management solution optimized for short-term rentals, emphasizing AI-generated insights and operational management. Conversely, STAY is a comprehensive guest experience OS designed to digitize hotel services, enhance communication, and reduce friction points during a guest’s stay. The stark contrast lies in their focus: Dack targets operational efficiency through AI, while STAY centers on elevating the guest experience via digital services.
Dack’s lack of recent reviews and zero review count suggest limited market presence and confidence, especially compared to STAY, which boasts 206 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 3/5. The absence of verified integrations and regional coverage further points to its narrower scope. Does your hotel prioritize operational management or guest experience? If guest interaction is a priority, STAY likely offers more immediate value.
If your hotel mainly needs a tool to handle short-term rental operations, focus on AI-driven reviews, or streamline property management, Dack might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews and a zero score on HotelTechReport, it’s hard to justify its effectiveness at this stage.
For hotels aiming to enhance guest engagement, reduce queue times, and digitize services like room service and local recommendations, STAY is clearly the stronger choice. Its 206 recent reviews with a 3/5 rating, along with high customer support scores, demonstrate proven success in the field. If you want a platform that’s tested, well-supported, and widely adopted, STAY is the more reliable pick.
Since Dack has no recent reviews or user ratings, its ease of use remains unverified. On the other hand, STAY scores a robust 4.78/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward CMS. Hoteliers comment that STAY’s mobile app is “simple to implement” and “easy to navigate,” which helps staff adopt it faster.
Given the current data, STAY’s user experience is clearly superior, and its onboarding process is rated at 4.63/5. Without recent feedback for Dack, the edge goes to STAY for ease of use.
Dack offers no unique features explicitly listed, focusing primarily on AI-based summaries for property management. In contrast, STAY provides 14 distinct features, including guest messaging, chatbots, room service ordering, local recommendations, multilingual support, and mobile checkout.
These features directly impact guest satisfaction and operational efficiency, giving STAY an undeniable edge. Its feature set is tailored for large-scale hotel operations, filling gaps that Dack does not address. For hotel teams seeking a feature-rich platform, STAY is the clear winner.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Dack’s customer support, which raises concerns about its responsiveness and reliability. Conversely, STAY scores a high 4.83/5 for customer support, with reviews praising its “helpful,” “responsive,” and “professional” team.
Many users highlight how STAY’s support team quickly resolves issues and provides ongoing assistance, which is crucial for smooth implementation and daily operations. The support experience alone strongly favors STAY for hotels seeking dependable vendor backing.
Dack has no verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. STAY, on the other hand, boasts 20 verified integrations with systems like Hotelkit, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and SiteMinder, covering PMS, CRM, and distribution platforms.
This extensive integration network simplifies back-end workflows and data sharing, making STAY more adaptable to your hotel’s existing tech stack. For hotels prioritizing connectivity, STAY offers a clear advantage.
Dack’s absence of recent reviews and a zero overall rating make it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. STAY, with 206 recent reviews and an overall rating of 3/5, indicates moderate but positive feedback, especially considering the high support ratings and feature count.
Property types like large chains and resorts tend to rate STAY higher due to its scalability and feature set. Given the recent reviews and high support scores, STAY’s rating reflects a more reliable and trusted solution for hotels.
Dack does not publicly list pricing details, which suggests it may have custom quotes or is less transparent. STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no implementation or additional charges, offering predictable costs for hotels.
The transparency and straightforward pricing of STAY make it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly, whereas Dack’s unclear pricing may pose challenges.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust guest engagement tools, integrations, or regional coverage. Dack is best suited for niche operational management, not full guest experience enhancement.
Not ideal if your hotel’s primary focus is property management without the need for a guest-facing app or if regional support is limited. STAY is ideal for hotels prioritizing guest engagement and operational digitization.
Dack positions itself as an AI-driven property management tool, with a focus on operational insights, but its current lack of recent reviews and features makes it a risky choice. STAY, with its 206 recent reviews, high customer support rating, and extensive feature set, proves to be a more reliable and comprehensive solution for hotels.
If your priority is guest experience, operational streamlining, and integrations, STAY is the clear winner. For niche management needs in the short-term rental space, Dack could be considered, but only with further validation of its capabilities.
For now, STAY’s proven track record, broad feature set, and recent positive reviews make it the recommended choice for most hotels looking to enhance guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
According to HTR's product database, Dack and STAY Guest App share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
What hoteliers love
Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information... Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information and services. Features like real-time updates, mobile service ordering, and the ability to make restaurant reservations reduce wait times and provide convenience.
The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and man... The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and manage content, whether they are hotel staff or guests.
STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front de... STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front desk lines. The tool facilitates sustainable practices by digitizing traditional paper-based services, aiding hotels in their sustainability goals.
Where hoteliers push back
The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more f... The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more flexibility in design and functionality.
Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrati... Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrations streamline data management and help provide a seamless experience for both staff and guests.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Dack and STAY Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Dack offers 0 verified integration partners, while STAY Guest App offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAY Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Dack: No. STAY Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Dack has an HT Score of 0 and STAY has 47. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor