The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 221 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eRevMax shines when it comes to support team — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Multi-Currency Support and Centralized user & role management.
innRoad shines when it comes to 24/7 customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 221 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 128 | 93 |
After analyzing 221 verified reviews, eRevMax users most value its support team, operational efficiency, rate parity, while innRoad users highlight 24/7 customer support, user interface, customization and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
+
24/7 Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
User Interface
▾
|
|
+
Rate Parity
▾
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
+
Reporting Functionality
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Issues
▾
|
−
Performance Issues and Bugs
▾
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #17 21 reviews | #9 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 59 reviews | #20 12 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 35 reviews | #16 4 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #10 5 reviews | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 52 reviews | #11 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 55 reviews | #20 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 35 reviews | #17 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 18 reviews | #11 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #9 17 reviews | #4 83 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #9 40 reviews | #24 5 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 14 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #3 42 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
Choosing a channel manager is crucial for your hotel's online distribution strategy. eRevMax's RateTiger and innRoad's Channel Manager both aim to streamline your operations and increase bookings, but they do so with different strengths. RateTiger has more reviews and recent feedback, making it the more reliable choice for up-to-date performance insights. So, which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
RateTiger by eRevMax and innRoad both address the core hotel distribution challenge: managing multiple OTAs and booking channels efficiently. RateTiger, established in 2001, is used globally with a focus on large and boutique hotels, offering extensive integrations and advanced analytics. innRoad, founded in 2007, caters primarily to small and mid-sized properties, emphasizing simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive support. While both connect to leading OTAs, RateTiger’s broader network and more robust feature set give it an edge, especially in complex distribution environments.
RateTiger’s strengths lie in its real-time synchronization and detailed reporting, which appeal to hotels with a complex distribution footprint. innRoad excels in user-friendliness and customer support, making it attractive for smaller teams seeking straightforward management. Do you need a more extensive network and advanced tools, or a simple, reliable platform?
If your hotel needs a high level of customization, extensive channel connections, and detailed analytics, go with RateTiger. Its 115 reviews and a strong recent review presence give it a solid reputation among hotels requiring complex distribution management. For properties like boutique hotels or larger resorts, RateTiger’s broader partner network and multi-lingual support are significant advantages.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, seamless onboarding, and dedicated support, innRoad is the better choice. It boasts a higher overall rating (4.88/5 versus RateTiger’s 4.7/5), with 64 recent reviews in the last six months, indicating current customer satisfaction. InnRoad’s focus on small hotels, with features like integrated PMS and guest communication, appeals to busy teams looking for reliability and simplicity.
RateTiger’s UI scores 4.39/5, and many reviews mention its somewhat outdated interface and learning curve. Users report that onboarding can be slow and that some features require training, which might be a hurdle for smaller teams. Despite its complexity, experienced users find its real-time updates and customization valuable, but new users may need more training resources.
InnRoad’s UI scores slightly higher at 4.53/5, and reviews consistently praise its user-friendly design. Users find it intuitive, with straightforward onboarding and training. Support from innRoad’s team is also frequently mentioned as prompt and helpful, easing the learning curve for new users.
Edge: innRoad.
RateTiger offers 7 shared features with innRoad, plus 3 unique functionalities like multi-currency support, multi-lingual capabilities, and centralized user management. Its feature set is ideal for hotels needing advanced analytics, rate management, and extensive OTA connections.
innRoad, however, provides 42 features, including a property management system, booking engine, group booking, pricing intelligence, guest communication, integrated payments, and more. Its rich feature set supports the full hotel operation, not just distribution, making it more versatile for smaller hotels.
Edge: innRoad.
RateTiger’s support scores 4.61/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpfulness. However, some users mention occasional delays in issue resolution and a desire for faster responses, especially during busy periods.
innRoad’s support scores slightly higher at 4.64/5. Customers frequently praise its 24/7 live support, quick response times, and ongoing training. Many reviews describe innRoad’s team as proactive and attentive, which is crucial for small teams relying on dependable assistance.
Edge: innRoad.
RateTiger boasts 70 verified partner integrations, including major OTAs, GDS, and PMS systems, giving hotels a broad network for distribution. Its connections include key players like Booking.com, Expedia, Airbnb, TripAdvisor, and regional providers, supporting global reach.
innRoad has fewer integrations—34 verified partners—but covers key OTAs like Google, Airbnb, Vrbo, and major booking engines. It also integrates with third-party systems like Quickbooks and offers support for direct billing and payment processing.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s HTG score is 67.78, with a 4.7/5 overall rating based on 115 reviews, most recent in the last six months. Hotels of various sizes, especially boutique and city center hotels, rate it highly for reliability and integration.
innRoad’s HTG score is significantly lower at 22.59, yet it boasts a higher overall rating of 4.88/5 from 64 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use and support. Smaller properties, especially inns and motels, tend to rate innRoad higher.
Edge: innRoad.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing models, but they are typically offered via custom quotes based on property size and needs. Neither has a freemium or trial version, so costs are likely tailored and negotiated.
Not ideal if you’re a small hotel seeking simplicity or a lower-cost solution.
Not ideal if you need extensive customization or operate in many regions requiring multi-lingual support.
RateTiger offers a broad network, advanced analytics, and extensive customization, making it suitable for larger hotels or those with complex distribution needs. Its strength lies in its global reach and detailed control over rates and inventory.
InnRoad excels in simplicity, support, and integrated hotel management features, ideal for small properties or hotels seeking a one-stop solution. Its user-friendly design and comprehensive support make it easier for teams to operate efficiently.
If your hotel values extensive integrations, customization, and global reach, choose RateTiger. If you need a reliable, easy-to-use platform with strong support tailored for smaller properties, innRoad is the better fit.
According to HTR's product database, RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) and innRoad Channel Manager share 7 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Group Booking Engine | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 33 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Although the product's support team receives overall positive feedback, some users suggest improvements for quicker issue resolution and consistent av... Although the product's support team receives overall positive feedback, some users suggest improvements for quicker issue resolution and consistent availability.
The integration between eRevMax's Booking Engine and Channel Manager has enhanced operational efficiency by streamlining booking processes.
Maintaining rate parity across all OTAs is noted as a significant benefit, ensuring that guests see consistent pricing regardless of booking platform,... Maintaining rate parity across all OTAs is noted as a significant benefit, ensuring that guests see consistent pricing regardless of booking platform, which boosts trust and potentially occupancy rates.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviews mention recurring technical issues like synchronization problems and availability update failures, though users acknowledge that support is pr... Reviews mention recurring technical issues like synchronization problems and availability update failures, though users acknowledge that support is prompt in handling such cases.
The comprehensive reporting and analytics tools are praised for providing valuable insights into booking trends, enabling hotels to make data-driven d... The comprehensive reporting and analytics tools are praised for providing valuable insights into booking trends, enabling hotels to make data-driven decisions to maximize revenue and optimize strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The 24/7 customer support is praised for its availability and responsiveness. Users highlight the supportive and knowledgeable nature of the tech team... The 24/7 customer support is praised for its availability and responsiveness. Users highlight the supportive and knowledgeable nature of the tech team, which is crucial for addressing technical issues promptly.
The user interface is often described as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy to train new staff. However, some users feel that certain areas,... The user interface is often described as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy to train new staff. However, some users feel that certain areas, like the group reservations module, could benefit from a more modern and streamlined design.
Users value the customization options of the software, particularly in the guest-facing appearance and billing functions. However, there is room for i... Users value the customization options of the software, particularly in the guest-facing appearance and billing functions. However, there is room for improvement in terms of more intuitive interfaces and additional customization features.
Where hoteliers push back
Several users report occasional bugs and performance issues, such as system freezes and slow load times. These glitches, while generally manageable, c... Several users report occasional bugs and performance issues, such as system freezes and slow load times. These glitches, while generally manageable, can disrupt operations and impact user satisfaction.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) and innRoad Channel Manager share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) offers 70 verified integration partners, while innRoad Channel Manager offers 34. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. innRoad Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax): No. innRoad Channel Manager: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eRevMax has an HT Score of 67 and innRoad has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor