The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 55 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines when it comes to customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and Mobile App.
Zen Hospitality Solutions shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like "What-if" scenario analysis and Future Market Demand Data.
Side-by-side ratings based on 55 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 40 | 15 |
After analyzing 55 verified reviews, Infor users most value its customer support, reporting capabilities, forecasting support, while Zen Hospitality Solutions users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Forecasting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Rate Recommendations
▾
|
|
|
−
Forecast Accuracy
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #22 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #24 11 reviews | #40 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 19 reviews | #35 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #24 19 reviews | #34 5 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 23 reviews | #41 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 19 reviews | #40 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #35 1 reviews | #13 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #22 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #28 6 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #7 21 reviews | #8 14 reviews |
| Middle East | #16 1 reviews | — |
Choosing a revenue management system (RMS) isn’t just about features; it’s about selecting a tool that aligns with your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals. Infor EzRMS and ZEN eManager both aim to optimize your pricing, but they approach this goal differently. Infor EzRMS is a deeply analytical platform with a broad feature set and extensive integrations, while ZEN eManager offers a streamlined, AI-powered solution with a focus on automation and ease of use. Which one best fits your hotel’s needs?
Both products seek to increase your revenue through smarter pricing, but they diverge in complexity, data depth, and integrations. Infor EzRMS has a longer legacy, with over 39 reviews, and is favored for its detailed data and multi-property management, making it ideal for larger, multi-location hotels or chains. ZEN eManager, with only 14 reviews but a higher recent rating, emphasizes simplicity, automation, and quick implementation, suited for smaller hotels or properties seeking an easy-to-operate solution. Are you looking for a feature-rich system or a straightforward, automated one?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, highly customizable revenue system with extensive reporting and multi-property management, Infor EzRMS is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for larger hotels, chains, and properties with advanced analytical needs, especially given its 113 verified integrations and broad regional presence.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, automation, and integrated services like Channel Management and PMS, ZEN eManager is the better pick. It’s especially designed for small to mid-sized properties, offering built-in tools that simplify revenue management without requiring deep technical expertise. For a hotel that values automation and simplicity over detailed customization, ZEN eManager is the more appropriate choice.
Infor EzRMS boasts a user rating of 4.49/5 for ease of use, with some users noting that it requires specific knowledge and training to maximize its potential. Its interface, while functional, can be complex, especially for teams without prior revenue management experience, and some users report that data extraction and report generation can be unclear or cumbersome.
ZEN eManager excels in ease of use, with a 4.93/5 rating. Its interface is described as clean, dynamic, and intuitive, making it accessible even to teams with limited technical backgrounds. The platform’s built-in automation and training tools further streamline adoption.
Edge: ZEN eManager.
Infor EzRMS offers 13 features exclusive to its platform, including Contact Management/CRM, Task Management, Client Communication portals, and Mobile App access—features that support detailed, multi-layered revenue strategies. It also provides advanced forecasting and enterprise guidelines but requires manual setup for workflows.
ZEN eManager includes 3 unique features like "What-if" scenario analysis, Future Market Demand Data, and Price Explanation, emphasizing automation over manual detail. Its features are designed for straightforward, real-time decision-making and simplicity.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS’s support scores at 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting responsiveness but also noting occasional delays, especially when system updates break functionalities. Users appreciate its support team’s professionalism but suggest that support hours could be expanded for better coverage.
ZEN eManager’s support ratings are higher at 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing its personalized, flexible, and proactive approach. Customers frequently praise the team’s quick assistance and ongoing platform improvements.
Edge: ZEN eManager.
Infor EzRMS stands out with 113 verified integrations, including major partners like Priority Software, Trevo, and Fairmas, enabling extensive connectivity across PMS, distribution, and financial systems. Its broad integration network supports large, multi-property operations with complex needs.
ZEN eManager has only 1 verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, signifying a more limited but focused integration scope. However, this may suffice for smaller properties or those seeking a simplified, all-in-one platform.
Edge: Infor EzRMS.
Infor EzRMS has an overall rating of 4.46/5, with a strong 4.6/5 from brand hotels, but only 3 reviews in the last 6 months, indicating less recent feedback. Larger hotels and chains tend to rate it higher, appreciating its depth and data richness.
ZEN eManager scores slightly higher at 4.93/5 overall, with recent reviews emphasizing its user-friendliness and automation. Given the lack of recent EzRMS reviews, ZEN eManager currently enjoys stronger recent feedback.
Edge: ZEN eManager.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. Typically, Infor EzRMS’s implementation and module costs tend to be higher due to its extensive features, while ZEN eManager’s simpler setup may result in lower total costs.
Your hotel should request tailored quotes to compare total investment, considering ongoing value and support.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited budget, or prefers a plug-and-play solution without extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive data analysis, custom workflows, or complex multi-property management.
Infor EzRMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich revenue management platform favored by larger hotels and chains with complex needs. Its broad integrations and detailed analytics support sophisticated strategies but come with higher costs and a steeper learning curve.
ZEN eManager provides a streamlined, AI-powered solution that excels in automation and user-friendliness, making it suitable for smaller hotels or properties wanting quick, effective revenue optimization. Its simpler setup and high recent ratings make it the more attractive choice for properties prioritizing ease of use.
If your hotel demands depth, extensive integrations, and detailed control, go with Infor EzRMS. Its proven track record and broad feature set make it ideal for larger, multi-property management.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, automated system that saves time and reduces complexity, ZEN eManager is the better option. Its ease of use and recent positive reviews make it the best choice for properties seeking simplicity and efficiency.
Final recommendation: For most hotels, especially those valuing recent support and user reviews, ZEN eManager is the stronger contender. Its high scores in customer support, ease of use, and recent ratings underscore its suitability for today’s hotel environment.
Revenue Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Infor EzRMS and ZEN eManager share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| "What-if" scenario analysis | ||
| Client Communication Portal | ||
| Contact Management/CRM | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Future Market Demand Data | ||
| Itinerary Printouts | ||
| Price Explanation | ||
| Seating Management | ||
| Task Management (Tasks & Reminders) |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, the... EzRMS's customer support receives high praise for responsiveness and efficacy, particularly in terms of solving technical issues quickly. However, there are suggestions for expanding support hours and having dedicated teams for specific markets.
EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both... EzRMS's reporting suite is praised for its flexibility and depth, allowing comprehensive data comparisons and trend analyses. It is effective for both retrospective and predictive business monitoring, aiding in better strategic planning and decision-making.
The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some user... The system offers extensive support for forecasting, reducing manual input for revenue managers and delivering actionable insights. However, some users feel that the system's predictions are sometimes inaccurate and require further refinement to improve reliability.
Where hoteliers push back
EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accura... EzRMS provides detailed rate recommendations, which users find helpful for optimizing revenue. However, some users report difficulties with the accuracy and automation of rate uploads, and there's room for improving synchronization with other systems to prevent issues like rate discrepancies.
Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general... Many users report issues with the forecast accuracy of EzRMS, although improvements have been noted with recent algorithm updates. There is a general sentiment that while the tool is powerful, forecasts can sometimes diverge significantly from actual outcomes, especially amid dynamic conditions like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor EzRMS and ZEN eManager share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor EzRMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while ZEN eManager offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ZEN eManager leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor EzRMS: No. ZEN eManager: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 25 and Zen Hospitality Solutions has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor