Kipsu vs. Loopon In-Stay:
Which Is Right for You?

Name: Loopon In-Stay
Rating: 5.0 (1 reviews)

Updated May 15, 2026 · 26 verified reviews analyzed

Kipsu

Visit Profile

4.2 (25 reviews) · 9 integrations

Loopon

Visit Profile

5.0 (1 reviews) · 11 integrations

TLDR

We analyzed 26 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:

Kipsu shines when it comes to guest engagement — especially for brand properties (4.4/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.

Loopon shines in ease of use and customer support .

See the full breakdown below ↓

How Does Kipsu Compare to Loopon In-Stay?

Side-by-side ratings based on 26 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.

	Kipsu	Loopon
HTScore	14	0
Likelihood to Recommend	84%	100%
Ease of Use	4.5/5	5.0/5
Customer Support	4.6/5	5.0/5
Value for Money	4.0/5	5.0/5

Starting Price	Contact sales	Contact sales
Verified Reviews	25	1

What Are the Pros and Cons of Kipsu vs Loopon In-Stay?

After analyzing 26 verified reviews, Kipsu users most value its guest engagement, operational efficiency, guests' preference for texting, while Loopon users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.

Kipsu	Loopon
Pros
+ Guest Engagement ▾ Kipsu empowers hotels to engage with guests promptly via mobile communication, enhancing guest satisfaction and allowing immediate issue resolution. Several reviews highlight its ease of use and the preference of guests to text rather than call.
+ Operational Efficiency ▾ Kipsu helps hotels by making communication more efficient. It allows front desk staff to handle guest queries quickly and track their usage of the app. There is a noted improvement in task management and operational flow among teams.
+ Guests' Preference for Texting ▾ The shift from phone calls to texting aligns with guests’ preferences, making it easier for them to communicate their needs discreetly. This trend is particularly beneficial for tech-savvy and mobile-centric guests.
+ Technology Adoption ▾ Kipsu meets current tech trends and guest expectations by leveraging mobile platforms for communication. This adoption not only satisfies guests but also keeps the hotel’s technological offerings current.
Cons
− Operational Limitations ▾ While many find Kipsu user-friendly, some note that it could be more robust. Limitations include the scope of the program and occasional hiccups with searching archived messages efficiently.
− PMS Integration ▾ Many users highlight the need for better integration with property management systems (PMS), noting delays and sync issues. Proper integration would further streamline communication by automatically updating guest details, which currently is a manual process for some.
− Formal Communication ▾ Some users express a preference for more formal communication methods. They highlight the need for consistency in grammar and punctuation, which can be challenging when text communication is managed by front desk agents.

Kipsu vs Loopon: Rankings by Hotel Segment

How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.

By Hotel Size

Segment	Kipsu	Loopon
Small (10-24 rooms)	#19 2 reviews	#22 0 reviews
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms)	#24 4 reviews	#17 1 reviews
Large (75-199 rooms) ▾	#11 8 reviews	#13 0 reviews
Kipsu Large hotels say that Kipsu's Guest Messaging Software excels due to its ability to enhance guest satisfaction through real-time feedback and improve communication efficiency, according to verified HotelTechReport reviews. It offers effective guest interactions and customizable communication tools, crucial for Large hotel environments. Loopon No segment summary available.
X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾	#8 7 reviews	#16 0 reviews
Kipsu X Large hotels say that Kipsu's Guest Messaging Software is highly valued for its facilitation of streamlined guest communication, ease of use, and quick response capabilities, according to verified HotelTechReport reviews. These strengths enhance guest satisfaction and operational efficiency. Loopon No segment summary available.

By Property Type

Segment	Kipsu	Loopon
Boutique ▾	#19 7 reviews	#22 0 reviews
Kipsu Boutique hotels say that Kipsu's Guest Messaging Software ranks highly, as verified HotelTechReport reviews highlight its ease of use, quick responses, and enhanced guest communication. These strengths are crucial for Boutique hotels aiming to improve guest engagement while maintaining operational efficiency. Loopon No segment summary available.
Luxury ▾	#12 15 reviews	#25 0 reviews
Kipsu Luxury hotels say that Kipsu's Guest Messaging Software ranks highly in verified HotelTechReport reviews for its efficient communication and ease of use, allowing staff to quickly address guest needs. Luxury properties appreciate its quick response capabilities and seamless integration with existing systems. Loopon No segment summary available.
Branded / Chain ▾	#12 17 reviews	#21 0 reviews
Kipsu Branded hotels say that Kipsu's Guest Messaging Software is highly rated in verified HotelTechReport reviews for enhancing guest satisfaction with real-time feedback, enabling efficient staff communication, and offering customizable quick replies to streamline interactions, all crucial for Branded's operations. Loopon No segment summary available.
Extended Stay	#19 1 reviews	#26 0 reviews

By Region

Segment	Kipsu	Loopon
North America ▾	#10 20 reviews	#22 0 reviews
Kipsu Na hotels say that Kipsu's Guest Messaging Software ranks highly due to its convenience and effectiveness in improving guest satisfaction, as stated in verified HotelTechReport reviews. The software is praised for enabling seamless, real-time communication and enhancing guest interactions, although some desire improved system integration. Loopon No segment summary available.
Europe	—	#9 1 reviews
Asia Pacific	—	#14 0 reviews
Middle East	#7 1 reviews	#8 0 reviews

How Much Do Kipsu and Loopon In-Stay Cost?

Guest Messaging Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.

	Kipsu	Loopon

Which Features Does Kipsu Have That Loopon In-Stay Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?

According to HTR's product database, Kipsu and Loopon In-Stay share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.

Feature	Kipsu	Loopon
Analytics dashboard
Guest History
Mobile Friendly
Photo Sharing
SMS text messaging
Whatsapp Integration

Showing top differences. 17 more features differ between these products.

Kipsu vs Loopon: The Bottom Line

Kipsu

4.2/5 from 25 reviews

What hoteliers love

Guest Engagement 100% positive

Kipsu empowers hotels to engage with guests promptly via mobile communication, enhancing guest satisfaction and allowing immediate issue resolution. S... Kipsu empowers hotels to engage with guests promptly via mobile communication, enhancing guest satisfaction and allowing immediate issue resolution. Several reviews highlight its ease of use and the preference of guests to text rather than call.

Operational Efficiency 100% positive

Kipsu helps hotels by making communication more efficient. It allows front desk staff to handle guest queries quickly and track their usage of the app... Kipsu helps hotels by making communication more efficient. It allows front desk staff to handle guest queries quickly and track their usage of the app. There is a noted improvement in task management and operational flow among teams.

Guests' Preference for Texting 89% positive

The shift from phone calls to texting aligns with guests’ preferences, making it easier for them to communicate their needs discreetly. This trend is... The shift from phone calls to texting aligns with guests’ preferences, making it easier for them to communicate their needs discreetly. This trend is particularly beneficial for tech-savvy and mobile-centric guests.

Where hoteliers push back

Operational Limitations 100% negative

While many find Kipsu user-friendly, some note that it could be more robust. Limitations include the scope of the program and occasional hiccups with... While many find Kipsu user-friendly, some note that it could be more robust. Limitations include the scope of the program and occasional hiccups with searching archived messages efficiently.

PMS Integration 78% negative

Many users highlight the need for better integration with property management systems (PMS), noting delays and sync issues. Proper integration would f... Many users highlight the need for better integration with property management systems (PMS), noting delays and sync issues. Proper integration would further streamline communication by automatically updating guest details, which currently is a manual process for some.

Ranks higher for

Large (75-199 rooms) #11 vs #13

Small (10-24 rooms) #19 vs #22

X-Large (200+ rooms) #8 vs #16

Bed & Breakfast & Inns #19 vs #23

Unique capabilities

Mobile Friendly Guest History Photo Sharing SMS text messaging Analytics dashboard

4.5/5 ease of use 3.5/5 support 9 integrations

Visit Profile

Loopon

5.0/5 from 1 reviews

Ranks higher for

Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #17 vs #24

City Center Hotels #14 vs #17

Airport/Conference Hotels #12 vs #20

5.0/5 ease of use 5.0/5 support 11 integrations

Visit Profile

Where the ratings diverge most

Overall Rating Kipsu 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)

Ease of Use Loopon 5.0 vs 4.5 (+0.5)

Customer Support Loopon 5.0 vs 3.5 (+1.5)

Value for Money Loopon 5.0 vs 3.7 (+1.3)

Onboarding Loopon 5.0 vs 4.4 (+0.6)

Frequently Asked Questions About Kipsu vs Loopon In-Stay

Can Kipsu replace Loopon In-Stay?

It depends on your requirements. Kipsu and Loopon In-Stay share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Kipsu offers 9 verified integration partners, while Loopon In-Stay offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.

Which is better for small or independent hotels?

Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Loopon In-Stay leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.

Do Kipsu or Loopon In-Stay offer a free plan?

Kipsu: No. Loopon In-Stay: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.

How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Kipsu and Loopon In-Stay?

The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Kipsu has an HT Score of 14 and Loopon has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.

Criteria Group	Weight	What It Measures
Customer Ratings & Reviews		How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias.
Partner Ecosystem		How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack.
Customer Centricity		How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features.
Reach, Staying Power & Resources		How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity.

Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →