The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 572 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
OnRes shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
Side-by-side ratings based on 572 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 572 |
After analyzing 572 verified reviews, OnRes users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight ease of use, customer service, continuous improvement. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Critical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing Concerns
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Database Transparency
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 214 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 245 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 149 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 70 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 72 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #14 11 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 445 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #8 9 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #17 3 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel management system can significantly impact your property's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both OnRes All-in-1 HMS and RoomRaccoon HMS aim to streamline your workflows, but they differ in scope, maturity, and user feedback. OnRes offers a comprehensive platform primarily for North American hotels, while RoomRaccoon boasts a broader international presence and a more extensive feature set. Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, location, and operational needs—so which one aligns best with your goals?
Both products target independent hotels and small properties, but RoomRaccoon has a more established reputation with over 484 recent reviews and a high rating of 4.95/5. Its recent reviews, especially from small hotels, highlight its ease of use, automation, and customer support, whereas OnRes’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, suggesting less recent market activity. Do you prioritize a system with proven recent adoption and positive user feedback?
OnRes positions itself as an all-in-one solution, focusing on operational workflows like housekeeping and maintenance, making it appealing if your hotel needs to streamline staff coordination. Conversely, RoomRaccoon combines property management, channel management, booking engine, and revenue features into one interface, offering a broader scope for independent hoteliers looking to scale. Are you seeking a specialized operations platform or an integrated, scalable system?
Finally, RoomRaccoon’s global presence across 34 countries and extensive partnership network give it an edge for international properties or those planning expansion. OnRes’s regional focus on North America limits its reach but may suit hotels targeting local markets. Is your hotel aiming for international growth or focusing on a specific region?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, feature-rich system with proven success in maximizing direct bookings, upselling, and automating guest communications, go with RoomRaccoon. Its extensive feature set, over 300 integrations, and highly positive recent reviews (97% likelihood to recommend) make it ideal for small to medium hotels looking to grow revenue efficiently.
However, if your hotel requires a platform that emphasizes staff and maintenance workflows with a focus on operational efficiency—particularly if you are in North America—OnRes might seem appealing. Yet, its zero recent reviews and lower user confidence suggest it’s less suitable for hotels seeking modern, proven technology. Is your priority guest experience and revenue growth or operational management?
Ultimately, RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews and high ratings position it as the more reliable choice. Its ability to automate, upscale, and integrate features support your hotel’s growth and guest satisfaction better than OnRes’s limited recent market evidence.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.87/5 ease of use rating and recent reviews praising its intuitive design emphasize its accessibility. Users highlight quick onboarding, straightforward navigation, and efficient staff training, with one hotel noting it "reduces training time and improves daily efficiency." Support responsiveness and onboarding are rated at 4.81/5, and customers frequently mention how easy it is to adopt.
OnRes, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its user experience today. With a small team and limited feedback, it’s unclear whether OnRes’s platform offers an intuitive or modern UI. Based on current data, Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers an extensive suite with 57 unique features, including special offers, automated emails, loyalty programs, multi-currency, revenue management, and a booking engine—all tailored for independent hotels. It also includes automation tools like night audits, payment requests, guest profiles, and integrated housekeeping modules, giving hoteliers a comprehensive management toolkit.
OnRes provides no specific features beyond basic operational workflows focused on housekeeping and maintenance coordination. Its limited feature set makes it less versatile for hotels seeking advanced revenue or guest engagement tools. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s reviews consistently praise its customer support, rating 4.74/5. Support agents are described as responsive, knowledgeable, and patient, helping hotels implement features and resolve issues swiftly. Many users mention that support is a key reason they trust and continue using the system.
OnRes lacks recent review data, so support quality remains unverified. Its support ratings are unknown, and the absence of recent user feedback raises concerns about ongoing service quality. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with over 88 verified partners, including popular channel managers, payment providers, and marketing tools, offering a flexible ecosystem. Shared integrations include Whistle, and it provides extensive options for automating and connecting various hotel functions.
OnRes has only 2 verified partners and limited integration options, which may hinder operational flexibility. Its ecosystem appears less mature, especially for hotels that depend on diverse third-party tools. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.95/5 overall rating and 97% likelihood to recommend reflect strong satisfaction, notably among boutique and independent hotels. Recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and revenue boosts, with small properties reporting significant improvements.
OnRes, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be reliably rated by hoteliers today. Its absence of recent feedback indicates it is less trusted or adopted currently. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
OnRes does not publicly disclose pricing, suggesting it may be custom or enterprise-focused, possibly making it less accessible for small hotels. RoomRaccoon charges a base price of $1,000 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees.
While RoomRaccoon’s pricing might seem steep for some, its transparent model and extensive features justify the cost for properties seeking growth and automation. OnRes’s unclear pricing limits its visibility and potential affordability for your property.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks advanced revenue management, guest engagement features, or international scalability.
Not ideal if your hotel operates at a large enterprise scale or prefers a customized, non-cloud solution.
RoomRaccoon stands out as the more recent, highly-rated, and feature-rich platform, backed by thousands of reviews and continuous development. Its ease of use, automation, and international presence make it a better fit for most independent hotels looking to grow efficiently.
If your hotel needs a proven, comprehensive system with a strong support network, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. OnRes’s limited recent feedback and feature set make it less suitable unless your focus is solely operational workflows within North America.
In conclusion, for modern hoteliers seeking a reliable, scalable, and well-supported platform, RoomRaccoon offers the most compelling value today.
Hotel Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, OnRes All-in-1 HMS and RoomRaccoon HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tariffs |
Showing top differences. 45 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users praise RoomRaccoon for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which reduces training time and allows smooth integration into dai... Many users praise RoomRaccoon for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which reduces training time and allows smooth integration into daily operations, thereby improving overall efficiency.
While some users commend the support team's responsiveness and expertise, others criticize the lack of after-sales care and response efficiency, indic... While some users commend the support team's responsiveness and expertise, others criticize the lack of after-sales care and response efficiency, indicating inconsistencies in customer service quality.
Users appreciate RoomRaccoon's ongoing development, including AI enhancements, which have contributed to improved sales and operational function, show... Users appreciate RoomRaccoon's ongoing development, including AI enhancements, which have contributed to improved sales and operational function, showcasing commitment to long-term adaptability.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews point out critical issues such as ineffective after-sales support and unresolved technical problems, significantly affecting user sati... Several reviews point out critical issues such as ineffective after-sales support and unresolved technical problems, significantly affecting user satisfaction and trust in the system.
The system's pricing is seen as steep by some users, especially those with seasonal businesses, impacting their decision-making despite the perceived... The system's pricing is seen as steep by some users, especially those with seasonal businesses, impacting their decision-making despite the perceived value of included features.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. OnRes All-in-1 HMS and RoomRaccoon HMS share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. OnRes All-in-1 HMS offers 2 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon HMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon HMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
OnRes All-in-1 HMS: No. RoomRaccoon HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. OnRes has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 86. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor