The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest profiles.
VIPS shines , with exclusive features like Native Email Marketing and Centralized Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 209 | 0 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, RoomRaccoon users most value its user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents, while VIPS users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #10 90 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 27 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #14 7 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 100 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 64 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 29 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 28 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #24 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 123 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #31 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #31 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. RoomRaccoon PMS and VIPS PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on understanding their core strengths and limitations, especially considering recent reviews and user feedback.
RoomRaccoon’s all-in-one platform has garnered a strong reputation, with over 169 reviews and a high NPS score, pointing to a mature, extensively tested solution. VIPS, with zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, remains less proven in the current market landscape.
Are you prioritizing a system that’s trusted by many and proven in real-world use? Let’s explore how each product stacks up.
RoomRaccoon and VIPS are both designed to manage hotel operations, but they target different market segments and maturity levels. RoomRaccoon provides a comprehensive, all-in-one solution that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, and automation tools, primarily for independent hotels and small hospitality businesses. VIPS presents a modular, cloud-based PMS with a focus on automation, self-service, and operational simplicity, yet it lacks recent user feedback to confirm its practical effectiveness.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews highlight a consistent user base appreciating its ease of use, automation features, and extensive integrations. VIPS, on the other hand, has no recent customer reviews or ratings, making its reliability and user satisfaction uncertain. Their market presence also differs: RoomRaccoon operates in Europe, Africa, and North America, while VIPS appears to be more regionally focused with no current data on user experiences.
Will your hotel benefit more from a proven, review-backed platform or from a newer solution with less market validation? Let’s examine which suits your hotel’s specific needs.
If your hotel needs a mature, well-rated PMS that integrates reservations, channel management, and automated guest communication, go with RoomRaccoon. It’s particularly suitable for small to medium-sized independent hotels, boutique properties, and vacation rentals aiming to consolidate operations into a single user-friendly platform.
If, instead, your team seeks a flexible, modular PMS emphasizing self-service check-in, event management, and simplified daily tasks, VIPS could be considered. However, given the absence of recent reviews and user data, it’s difficult to confirm VIPS’s effectiveness or support quality. For now, RoomRaccoon’s proven track record makes it the safer choice.
RoomRaccoon scores a 4.74 out of 5 for ease of use, with high ratings for its intuitive interface and onboarding experience. Reviewers consistently highlight how quickly staff can learn the system, with many noting that it simplifies daily tasks such as bookings, check-ins, and invoicing.
VIPS, with no recent reviews or ratings, leaves its usability in question. The lack of user feedback makes it impossible to assess whether it’s as intuitive or easy to implement as RoomRaccoon. Based on available data, Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 33 shared features plus 18 unique to its platform, including a mobile app, multi-currency support, guest profiles, PMS connectivity, analytics dashboard, online checkout, and extensive automation tools like shift planning and ID scanning. Its feature set is designed to cover most operational needs of small to mid-sized hotels.
VIPS provides 12 unique features such as native email marketing, tablet check-in, GDPR compliance, and task management, but lacks the breadth of automation and integrations seen in RoomRaccoon. The limited features and absence of recent user validation favor RoomRaccoon. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores 4.53 out of 5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially during onboarding. Customers appreciate the proactive approach and detailed assistance, which minimizes operational disruptions.
VIPS offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service reputation uncertain. Without recent feedback, RoomRaccoon’s established support advantage is clear. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon boasts 88 verified partner integrations, including popular solutions like SiteMinder, Sage, and Paxxio. This wide ecosystem allows hotels to connect their preferred tools, reducing manual work and improving operational flow.
VIPS has only 11 verified integrations, with some overlaps such as RoomChecking and Omnitec Systems. The more extensive partner network of RoomRaccoon positions it as the more adaptable platform. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon holds a 4.88/5 overall rating based on 169 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels of various sizes, especially boutique and independent properties, consistently recommend it, citing tangible improvements in revenue and efficiency.
VIPS has no recent ratings or reviews, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the data, RoomRaccoon’s higher and more recent ratings clearly favor it. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon has a base price of $1,000 monthly with no freemium, trial, or implementation fees, offering a transparent pricing model. VIPS’s base price is $800, also without additional fees or trial options, but the lack of recent reviews makes it hard to evaluate value.
While VIPS is slightly cheaper, its missing user validation makes its value proposition less certain. In practice, RoomRaccoon’s clear pricing and proven ROI support its cost. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon stands out as the more validated, feature-rich, and user-rated PMS, making it the safer choice for most hotels. Its proven ability to improve operational efficiency, increase direct bookings, and offer extensive integrations makes it suitable for small to medium-sized independent properties.
VIPS offers a modular approach emphasizing automation and self-service, but the lack of recent customer feedback introduces risk. For now, unless your hotel operates solely in VIPS’s regional zones or has specific niche needs, RoomRaccoon’s established reputation and comprehensive features make it the superior option.
In summary, if you want a trusted, mature system that simplifies operations while driving revenue, choose RoomRaccoon. If you’re willing to risk less proven technology for a potentially flexible, modular system, VIPS might be worth exploring—but proceed cautiously.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, RoomRaccoon PMS and VIPS PMS share 33 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RoomRaccoon PMS and VIPS PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88 verified integration partners, while VIPS PMS offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RoomRaccoon PMS: No. VIPS PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RoomRaccoon has an HT Score of 80 and VIPS has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor