The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GuestSpace shines when it comes to user experience , with exclusive features like Payments and Mobile Checkin.
STAY shines in customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 215 |
After analyzing 242 verified reviews, GuestSpace users most value its user experience, communication features, guest self-service features, while STAY users highlight guest experience optimization, mobile and user experience, operational efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
+
Guest Experience Optimization
▾
|
|
+
Communication Features
▾
|
+
Mobile and User Experience
▾
|
|
+
Guest Self-Service Features
▾
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
+
Support and Service
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration with Lock and Reservation Systems
▾
|
−
CMS and Customization
▾
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
−
Language Options
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 89 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 24 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 77 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 88 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 112 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #7 2 reviews |
Choosing between Drop.in Guest App by Drop.in and STAY Guest App by STAY hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both platforms aim to enhance guest experience and streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and review momentum. Your decision will be shaped by whether you prioritize more comprehensive features and recent user feedback (Drop.in) or broader integration options and global reach (STAY). Which product aligns better with your hotel’s current priorities?
Drop.in and STAY both serve the hotel guest app category but approach guest interaction differently. Drop.in focuses on automating the front desk with digital check-in, mobile keys, and upsell tools, targeting hotels looking to reduce operational overhead. STAY emphasizes a full guest experience platform that digitizes services from room access to dining reservations, ideal for hotels aiming for a holistic guest engagement solution.
Drop.in boasts a higher overall rating (0/5 vs. 3/5) based on recent reviews and a significantly larger number of recent reviews (26 versus 0 in the last six months). Its core strength lies in automating check-in and payments, making it ideal for tech-forward hotels seeking operational efficiency. Conversely, STAY’s broader service integrations and global hotel chain adoption make it suitable if your hotel prioritizes seamless system integration and scalability.
Given the latest data, Drop.in’s recent review activity and higher rating suggest it is the more actively validated platform. Does your hotel prefer a specialized, check-in-focused solution (Drop.in) or a broader guest experience system (STAY)?
If your hotel needs to streamline front desk operations, reduce manual tasks, and focus on contactless check-in and upselling, Drop.in is the clear choice. Its features like digital check-in, mobile keys, and in-stay payments are tailored for properties seeking operational automation and guest self-service, especially in hybrid or boutique hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes comprehensive guest engagement, with multiple services accessible via a single app, STAY is the better fit. Its strengths include a wide range of integrations, robust analytics, and a proven track record with large chains like NH Hotels and RIU, making it ideal for hotels aiming to digitize every aspect of the guest journey.
For properties focused on reducing front desk queues and increasing revenue through upselling, Drop.in’s targeted features make it the smarter pick. Conversely, if your hotel wants a broad, multi-service platform for diverse hotel operations, STAY’s extensive integration ecosystem and proven global implementation are compelling.
Drop.in scores a solid 4.58/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive guest web app, simple check-in process, and straightforward onboarding. Hotels report that staff find it easy to implement and guests quickly adapt to its digital interface. However, some mention that customizing messaging and deeper integration require improvements.
STAY edges slightly higher at 4.78/5, with reviewers emphasizing its user-friendly CMS, clear content management, and simple navigation from both staff and guest perspectives. Hotels also appreciate its quick deployment and minimal learning curve, despite some noting room for enhanced language support and faster reporting.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in offers unique capabilities such as integrated payments and mobile check-in, features absent in STAY. Its focus on contactless check-in, digital keys, and upsell tools cater directly to operational automation, with only two features exclusive to Drop.in.
STAY provides four features not in Drop.in, including a dedicated chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and a mobile app. Its broader suite supports a more comprehensive guest experience, managing everything from service requests to reservations.
While Drop.in’s niche features suit hotels seeking operational automation, STAY’s variety caters to properties wanting a multi-service platform. The choice hinges on whether your hotel prefers specialized check-in tools or a full-service guest experience system.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in's support and onboarding ratings are strong at 4.46/5, with many users appreciating prompt assistance and clear communication. However, some reviews mention the need for faster support response times and more in-depth customization support.
STAY’s customer support scores slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, helpful service, and effective onboarding. Clients frequently mention that the support team is knowledgeable and proactive, though some express wish for expanded support hours and more direct communication channels.
Edge: STAY.
STAY’s platform boasts 20 verified integrations, significantly more than Drop.in’s four. Key shared integrations include Mews, but STAY also connects with hotelkit, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and many others, enabling hotels to unify various systems efficiently.
Drop.in’s integrations are limited mainly to core reservation and access systems like Goki and Stayntouch, plus a few niche partners. If your hotel relies on multiple connected systems, STAY’s wider integration network offers more flexibility and scalability.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in’s recent reviews, with 26 in the last six months, reflect a high likelihood to recommend at 93%. Its current HT Score of approximately 78 underscores strong satisfaction among hotels seeking automation.
STAY, with over 200 reviews and a higher recent rating, has a slightly higher likelihood to recommend at 96%. Large hotel groups like NH Hotels and RIU rate STAY highly for its comprehensive services and integration capabilities, especially in the luxury and chain hotel segments.
Given the volume and recency, STAY’s broader positive feedback makes it the more trusted choice at this moment.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in charges a flat base price of $600 per month, with no trial, freemium, or per-room fees. Its pricing reflects a focus on automated check-in, payments, and upsell features, targeting hotels willing to invest in operational automation.
STAY’s pricing starts at $300 per month, also without trial or per-room fees. Its lower base cost coupled with extensive integrations and features makes it attractive for hotels seeking a scalable guest experience platform without a hefty upfront investment.
If budget is a primary concern, STAY offers a more affordable entry point, though Drop.in’s specialized features justify its higher price for automation-focused hotels.
Drop.in is ideal for:
Not ideal if:
Drop.in excels where automation and operational reduction are priorities—perfect for properties with a tech-forward approach.
STAY suits:
Not ideal if:
STAY is the choice for hotels committed to broad digital engagement, operational insights, and global scalability.
Drop.in and STAY address different hotel needs but share the goal of elevating guest experiences. Drop.in’s specialty in automating check-ins and reducing operational overhead makes it suitable for hotels prioritizing efficiency, especially in boutique or hybrid properties. STAY, with its extensive integrations and broad service offerings, is better positioned for large chains or hotels seeking to digitize their entire guest journey.
Choose Drop.in if your hotel needs a straightforward, automated check-in process that boosts revenue through upselling. Opt for STAY if your property aims to deliver a comprehensive digital guest experience, improve operational workflows, and scale globally.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and higher engagement matter most, STAY’s current momentum makes it the more proven choice. However, for targeted automation and guest self-service, Drop.in remains a strong contender.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, GuestSpace and STAY Guest App share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Payments |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
What hoteliers love
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
The communication features within DropIn are positively acknowledged; however, some users feel there is room for improvement in outbound communication... The communication features within DropIn are positively acknowledged; however, some users feel there is room for improvement in outbound communication capabilities to enhance guest interaction further.
Guests benefiting from self-service features enjoy more control over their stay, which is facilitated by DropIn, significantly enhancing their experie... Guests benefiting from self-service features enjoy more control over their stay, which is facilitated by DropIn, significantly enhancing their experience. Users align this with increased operational efficiencies as well.
Where hoteliers push back
The integration of DropIn with reservation systems like Mews and its ability to generate digital access codes are highly appreciated. This feature red... The integration of DropIn with reservation systems like Mews and its ability to generate digital access codes are highly appreciated. This feature reduces the need for manual check-ins and enhances the simplicity and security of guest room access.
While generally well-received, several users mentioned a desire for more customization options within the DropIn platform, especially regarding guest... While generally well-received, several users mentioned a desire for more customization options within the DropIn platform, especially regarding guest communications and menu settings. Improvements in this area could further optimize its utility.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information... Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information and services. Features like real-time updates, mobile service ordering, and the ability to make restaurant reservations reduce wait times and provide convenience.
The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and man... The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and manage content, whether they are hotel staff or guests.
STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front de... STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front desk lines. The tool facilitates sustainable practices by digitizing traditional paper-based services, aiding hotels in their sustainability goals.
Where hoteliers push back
The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more f... The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more flexibility in design and functionality.
Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrati... Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrations streamline data management and help provide a seamless experience for both staff and guests.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GuestSpace and STAY Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. GuestSpace offers 4 verified integration partners, while STAY Guest App offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAY Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GuestSpace: No. STAY Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GuestSpace has an HT Score of 78 and STAY has 47. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor