The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 172 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cendyn shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
Xotels shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 172 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 172 | 0 |
After analyzing 172 verified reviews, Cendyn users most value its support team responsiveness, booking engine ease of use, rate plan management, while Xotels users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team Responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Plan Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-Time Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking Notifications Delay
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 28 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 66 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 36 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 33 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 96 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 67 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 53 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 13 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 115 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 26 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #1 9 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #5 4 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cendyn CRS by Cendyn and Xotels' CRS depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline reservations and increase revenue, but they differ significantly in features, scale, and market focus. Cendyn’s platform offers a broad array of integrated tools, while Xotels emphasizes simplicity and targeted revenue management for independent properties. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize comprehensive functionality or ease of use.
Cendyn has a solid reputation backed by 136 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.47/5, making it a trusted choice for hotels seeking a robust, feature-rich reservation system. Xotels, with no recent reviews and a 0 rating, lacks the validation needed for confident decision-making. Will you rely on proven, well-reviewed technology or wait for more feedback from Xotels?
Cendyn CRS outperforms Xotels in nearly every category due to its extensive feature set, larger user base, and recent positive reviews. Its 87.78 HTR Score and high overall rating reflect strong hotel satisfaction. Xotels, however, offers limited functionality and no recent user feedback, making it less suitable for hoteliers seeking proven reliability. If you want a system with current, verified user experiences, Cendyn is the clear winner.
Cendyn is designed for hotels that need a comprehensive, integrated reservation platform capable of managing multi-property operations, dynamic pricing, and extensive distribution channels. Its 21 exclusive features, including a booking engine, channel management, and metasearch connectivity, support complex revenue strategies. In contrast, Xotels primarily targets independent hotels or resorts focusing on reservation synchronization and basic availability management, lacking the advanced features of Cendyn.
Your hotel should choose Cendyn if your focus is on maximizing revenue through sophisticated rate management, detailed reporting, and multi-channel distribution. If your hotel is smaller, with straightforward booking needs, or if you prioritize ease of management over advanced features, Xotels might seem appealing—yet its lack of recent reviews makes this a risky choice.
Are you seeking a system that supports complex revenue strategies and extensive integrations, or one that simply keeps your reservations synchronized?
Cendyn’s ease of use is rated at 4.34/5, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive dashboard, comprehensive onboarding, and support. Users find it straightforward to train staff and integrate with existing systems, which is crucial for operational efficiency. Conversely, Xotels offers no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability confidently.
Given the current data, Cendyn’s proven user-friendly interface and high support ratings make it the easier platform for your team to adopt. Without recent feedback on Xotels’ interface or onboarding, choosing Cendyn minimizes operational risk.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn clearly leads with 21 exclusive features, including reporting dashboards, a booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, dynamic pricing, and multi-property management. These tools enable you to control rates, inventory, and distribution effectively. Xotels offers no feature list or additional capabilities beyond basic reservation synchronization, limiting its utility for advanced revenue management.
For hotels seeking a full-featured reservation and distribution system, Cendyn’s comprehensive suite is unmatched. Xotels’ limited feature set makes it suitable only for very simple booking needs.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s support receives an average rating of 4.54/5, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Many reviews emphasize the support team’s quick reaction times and thorough assistance, which reduce operational disruptions. There are some negative comments about delays in booking notifications, but overall satisfaction remains high.
Xotels offers no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. Given Cendyn’s recent positive feedback, it’s clear that their customer support is a strong point.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn boasts 116 verified integrations with partners like RMS, Mews, and Cloudbeds, providing extensive connectivity with PMS, CRS, and other systems. This support makes it highly adaptable to existing hotel tech stacks. Xotels, with only 6 verified partners, offers limited integration options, potentially restricting your ability to connect with other essential systems.
For hotels that rely on a broad ecosystem of software, Cendyn’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage. Xotels’ limited partner list restricts your options.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s recent reviews reflect an overall 4.47/5 rating, with high marks from a variety of hotel segments, including independent, boutique, and branded hotels. Customers praise its ease of use, support, and advanced features. Xotels has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, Cendyn’s high ratings demonstrate consistent hotel satisfaction across segments. Xotels’ lack of recent feedback leaves its reputation unverified.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its flat-rate model simplifies budgeting for most hotels. Xotels does not publicly disclose pricing, so your hotel would need to contact them for a quote, which may vary depending on your requirements.
Based on available data, Cendyn’s transparent pricing offers clarity and predictability. Xotels’ undisclosed costs could pose budgeting challenges.
Hotels that should consider Cendyn include:
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal distribution channels, or if you prefer simple reservation management without advanced features.
Xotels is suited for:
Not ideal if you operate a large chain, need advanced revenue management tools, or require extensive third-party integrations.
Cendyn CRS is a comprehensive, proven platform trusted by many hotels worldwide, supported by thousands of integrations and positive recent reviews. Its broad feature set and high satisfaction ratings make it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency and revenue growth.
Choose Cendyn if your hotel needs advanced tools, multi-property management, and extensive distribution. It offers the most confidence, especially with recent, high-quality reviews backing its performance.
Xotels, lacking recent feedback and with a minimal feature set, is better suited for very small or straightforward properties that prioritize reservation synchronization over advanced functionalities. Its limited market presence and unverified reviews make it a less reliable choice for most hotels today.
In conclusion, for hotels aiming to grow revenue, streamline operations, and rely on validated user experiences, Cendyn remains the top recommendation.
According to HTR's product database, Cendyn CRS and Xotels (CRS) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking engine | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Channel management & OTA distribution | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The support team’s promptness and effectiveness are frequently praised. Users appreciate the quick response times and professional assistance in resol... The support team’s promptness and effectiveness are frequently praised. Users appreciate the quick response times and professional assistance in resolving issues, which enhances their overall experience with the system.
The booking engine by Pegasus is frequently mentioned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, both for hotel staff and guests. Users appreciate how... The booking engine by Pegasus is frequently mentioned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, both for hotel staff and guests. Users appreciate how easy it is to create rate plans, manage reservations, and navigate the system, which significantly streamlines the booking process.
Many reviews note the effectiveness of Pegasus in handling rate plan configuration, offering extensive customizability to suit different hotel needs.... Many reviews note the effectiveness of Pegasus in handling rate plan configuration, offering extensive customizability to suit different hotel needs. This includes deriving rates from existing plans and making bulk updates, which improves revenue management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users feel that certain aspects of the booking engine and rate management features could benefit from greater customization. Suggestions include... Some users feel that certain aspects of the booking engine and rate management features could benefit from greater customization. Suggestions include more flexibility in layout design and the ability to integrate personalized modifications without extensive support intervention.
Some reviews highlight interface problems, particularly with integration systems like SiteMinder. Users mention the need for regular refreshes and occ... Some reviews highlight interface problems, particularly with integration systems like SiteMinder. Users mention the need for regular refreshes and occasional connectivity disruptions, which lead to inconsistencies in rate and inventory management.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cendyn CRS and Xotels (CRS) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Cendyn CRS offers 116 verified integration partners, while Xotels (CRS) offers 6. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cendyn CRS leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cendyn CRS: No. Xotels (CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cendyn has an HT Score of 88 and Xotels has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor