The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 52 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
alliants shines when it comes to direct multi-channel guest engagement — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Loopon shines in ease of use and customer support .
Side-by-side ratings based on 52 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 51 | 1 |
After analyzing 52 verified reviews, alliants users most value its direct multi-channel guest engagement, support and training, operational efficiency and cost reduction, while Loopon users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Direct Multi-Channel Guest Engagement
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Training
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction
▾
|
|
|
+
User Identification and Security
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Automated Messaging and Templates
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile App Functionality
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Language Support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #24 1 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 19 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 21 reviews | #13 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #16 14 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 45 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 15 reviews | #21 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #25 1 reviews | #26 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 13 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #10 16 reviews | #9 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #7 4 reviews | #14 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 15 reviews | #8 0 reviews |
Choosing between Alliants Guest Messaging and Loopon In-Stay hinges on your hotel's specific needs, guest profile, and operational priorities. Both aim to improve guest communication, but Alliants offers a broader feature set and larger review base, while Loopon emphasizes simplicity and all-in-one messaging without downloads. Which product aligns with your hotel’s size, segment, and tech infrastructure?
Both platforms address the challenge of engaging guests efficiently from pre-arrival to post-stay, but their approach and sophistication differ. Alliants provides multi-channel, multi-language messaging with extensive automation, making it suitable for hotels seeking deep integration. Loopon centers on straightforward, in-stay chat and feedback, ideal for properties prioritizing ease of use. Do you need a robust multi-channel system or a simple guest feedback tool?
Alliants excels with a comprehensive set of 44 unique features tailored for larger hotels and chains, supporting multi-channel messaging, automation, and integrations. Loopon, however, offers a single streamlined platform with a focus on ease of use, requiring no downloads or complex setup, which appeals to smaller hotels or properties new to digital guest communication.
Alliants boasts a strong global presence with 50 reviews and an overall rating of 4.46/5, with recent feedback confirming its high reliability and feature richness. Loopon, with only one review and an unverified overall score, lacks the same depth of customer feedback, making Alliants the more proven choice for established hotels. Is your priority a feature-heavy, widely adopted platform or a simple, no-fuss solution?
Alliants scores 4.52/5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive interface and effective onboarding, despite some noting initial setup time. Loopon, with a perfect 5/5 rating, is repeatedly praised for its simplicity, clarity, and quick learning curve, making it ideal for properties without dedicated IT teams.
While Alliants’ onboarding takes about two days and offers remote support, some users report occasional challenges with app stability and PMS integration. Loopon’s straightforward design means staff can start communicating almost immediately, with minimal training. Edge: Loopon.
Alliants provides 44 features, including multi-channel messaging (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, SMS), real-time translation, automated workflows, guest history, digital check-in, and chatbots. Loopon, by comparison, offers a unified chat and feedback system without advanced automation or integrations, focusing on core communication needs.
Alliants’ features target larger hotels with complex operations, allowing extensive personalization, automation, and analytics. Loopon’s strength lies in its simplicity and immediate feedback, but it lacks the breadth of automation and integrations seen in Alliants. Edge: Alliants.
Alliants’ support score is 4.53/5, with reviewers highlighting responsive, knowledgeable service and excellent onboarding. Support reviews describe Alliants’ team as proactive and helpful, including detailed training sessions.
Loopon’s support rating is a perfect 5/5, with users emphasizing its reliability and ease of access to support, but the limited review count makes it less proven. Given Alliants’ larger user base and recent feedback, it’s clear their support is more established. Edge: Alliants.
Alliants integrates with 13 verified partners, including major PMS and system providers like Cendyn, Amadeus, and Shiji Group. Loopon has 11 verified integrations, including Mews and Sirvoy, with two shared partners.
Alliants’ broader partner network offers more options for larger hotel groups seeking extensive system connectivity. Loopon’s integrations tend to serve smaller properties or simpler setups. Edge: Alliants.
With 50 reviews, Alliants averages 4.46/5, with high ratings from branded hotels (4.7/5) and city center hotels (4.45/5). Recent reviews confirm its effectiveness across multiple segments, especially for larger or chain properties.
Loopon has only one review, which rates it highly for simplicity and reliability but does not provide comprehensive insights or segment-specific feedback. Based on review volume and recency, Alliants is more trusted by hoteliers. Edge: Alliants.
Alliants charges a flat $200/month with no free tier or trial, making it transparent and predictable for mid-sized hotels. Loopon does not publicly disclose pricing, which could indicate bespoke quotes or a focus on larger enterprise deals.
Given the available data, Alliants’ straightforward pricing model offers better clarity for budgeting. Loopon’s unknown costs make it less accessible for smaller hotels or those seeking clear pricing. Edge: Alliants.
Not ideal if your property is small, budget-focused, or prefers minimal systems with simple communication needs.
Not ideal if your hotel requires multi-channel automation, extensive integrations, or complex guest management features.
Alliants Guest Messaging offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform suited for larger hotels and chains seeking automation, multi-channel communication, and extensive integrations. Its large review base and recent feedback highlight its reliability and broad functionality, making it a trusted choice for established properties.
Loopon In-Stay is a straightforward, easy-to-use solution ideal for smaller hotels or those new to digital guest communication who prioritize simplicity and quick deployment. Its limited reviews and features mean it’s best for properties with minimal operational complexity.
Choose Alliants if your hotel needs scalability, automation, and global reach. Opt for Loopon if your priority is ease, speed, and core guest feedback without complexity.
According to HTR's product database, Alliants Guest Messaging and Loopon In-Stay share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Guest History | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| SMS text messaging | ||
| Secured Data Protection | ||
| Whatsapp Integration |
Showing top differences. 32 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users overwhelmingly praise Alliants for facilitating direct communication with guests through various channels, such as WhatsApp and SMS. This featur... Users overwhelmingly praise Alliants for facilitating direct communication with guests through various channels, such as WhatsApp and SMS. This feature helps in quick resolution of guest queries and improves overall guest satisfaction.
Users generally find support from the Alliants team to be excellent, with responsive and helpful training sessions. There are occasional mentions of t... Users generally find support from the Alliants team to be excellent, with responsive and helpful training sessions. There are occasional mentions of the need for continuous updates and new feature training.
The platform helps reduce operational costs by automating repetitive tasks and provides an efficient channel for guest communications. Some users have... The platform helps reduce operational costs by automating repetitive tasks and provides an efficient channel for guest communications. Some users have seen a reduction in payroll costs due to this efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Alliants' automated messaging system and the ability to use predefined templates significantly increase operational efficiency. However, limitations o... Alliants' automated messaging system and the ability to use predefined templates significantly increase operational efficiency. However, limitations on template use, such as the inability to send follow-up messages without templates, have been noted.
While the mobile app allows staff to stay connected with guests on-the-go, significant issues such as frequent logouts, notification problems, and ove... While the mobile app allows staff to stay connected with guests on-the-go, significant issues such as frequent logouts, notification problems, and overall instability have been highlighted by users.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Alliants Guest Messaging and Loopon In-Stay share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Alliants Guest Messaging offers 13 verified integration partners, while Loopon In-Stay offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Loopon In-Stay leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Alliants Guest Messaging: No. Loopon In-Stay: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. alliants has an HT Score of 23 and Loopon has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor