The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 220 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ASA Hotelsoftware shines , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
RoomRaccoon shines when it comes to user interface and experience — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Employee Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 220 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 209 |
After analyzing 220 verified reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #49 4 reviews | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 6 reviews | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #61 1 reviews | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #27 11 reviews | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s success. Both ASA Hotelsoftware and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue. Yet, they target different hotel segments and offer contrasting features, support, and usability. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs.
ASA Hotelsoftware is more established with a smaller review base but boasts a high overall rating. RoomRaccoon, with significantly more recent reviews and a larger user community, has garnered a reputation for its user-friendly, all-in-one approach. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
ASA Hotelsoftware is designed for hotels seeking a comprehensive, multi-department management solution, especially those in Europe. Its strength lies in its depth of functionalities, like spa management and detailed guest communication, tailored for larger or multi-venue properties.
RoomRaccoon excels at simplicity and automation, focusing on small to medium-sized hotels and independent operators. Its well-rounded features, including booking engine, channel management, and dynamic pricing, are aimed at hotels that want efficiency without complexity.
Given the difference in review counts—RoomRaccoon with 169 reviews, ASA with 11—the more recent and larger dataset favors RoomRaccoon. Its user feedback emphasizes ease of use, automation, and revenue growth, making it more appealing for small hotels.
Are you prioritizing a broad, versatile system or an intuitive, automated platform?
If your hotel is a small to mid-sized independent property, RoomRaccoon is likely the better fit. Its features—booking engine, channel manager, and automation tools—are built for quick onboarding and daily use, with a user-rated ease of use of 4.74/5.
If your team needs a full-scale solution capable of managing multiple departments, spa, and extensive guest communication, ASA’s more comprehensive modules and its 4.73/5 customer support rating make it suitable. Larger resorts or properties with multiple revenue streams may benefit from ASA’s deeper functionalities.
For hotels focused on rapid implementation, automation, and direct booking growth, RoomRaccoon is the clear recommendation. Meanwhile, ASA is better if your needs involve complex operations and multi-department coordination.
Both products receive high ease of use ratings—ASA scores 4.73/5, RoomRaccoon 4.74/5. —based on recent reviews. ASA’s interface is described as logical and straightforward, even for staff unfamiliar with hotel management software, with users appreciating how quickly new staff can be trained.
RoomRaccoon, however, is celebrated for its intuitive design, especially for independent hoteliers. Multiple reviews highlight how easily staff can learn and navigate the system, reducing onboarding time and errors.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
ASA offers 13 unique modules, including spa & wellness, guest communication via SMS, and native email marketing. It also features GDPR compliance and mobile notes, providing a broad array of tools for larger operations.
RoomRaccoon has 18 exclusive features like a booking engine, multi-channel management, guest profiles, and real-time integrations, tailored for booking automation and revenue optimization. Its features are designed to maximize small hotel efficiency with tools like yield management, online check-in, and multi-lingual support.
With 33 shared features, both systems cover fundamental PMS functionalities. However, ASA’s additional modules cater more to properties with complex needs, while RoomRaccoon’s automation tools are ideal for streamlining smaller operations.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
ASA’s customer support scores 4.73/5, with reviews praising quick response times and dedicated contact persons. Users report that support is proactive and helpful, especially during updates and troubleshooting.
RoomRaccoon’s support rates 4.53/5, with reviews mentioning friendly staff but occasionally slow responses. Some users note that during busy periods, issue resolution can take longer, though overall, support is helpful.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware.
RoomRaccoon has a broader integration network with 88 verified partners, including popular tools like Sage, WuBook, and Paxxio. It offers seamless, two-way real-time connections for OTA, CRM, and payment systems.
ASA integrates with 49 verified partners, including key hospitality solutions like Fairmas, SuitePad, and Vertical Booking. Its integrations are well-established but fewer in number, focusing more on core hotel management tools.
If extensive third-party integrations are critical, RoomRaccoon’s superior partner network is the advantage.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Though ASA has a perfect 5/5 rating from its 11 reviews—primarily from resorts in Europe—these are fewer and dated. Its recent reviews are scarce, limiting confidence in current user sentiment.
RoomRaccoon’s 169 reviews, with a 4.88/5 overall rating, reflect consistent, recent positive feedback from diverse hotel types globally. Hoteliers particularly value its ease of use, automation, and revenue tools.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, RoomRaccoon’s rating is more indicative of current satisfaction.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Both products are priced at a base fee of $1,000.00, with no mention of additional implementation fees, monthly charges, or trial periods. Their pricing models are straightforward, catering to hotels that prefer predictable costs.
Since no further pricing tiers are listed, your decision should focus on the value derived from features and support rather than costs.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal staff or a limited budget for complex software.
Not ideal if you primarily need reservation management without additional departmental needs or if your hotel is outside Europe.
Not ideal if your hotel requires deep multi-department management or complex operational modules.
ASA Hotelsoftware is a robust, multi-functional PMS suited for larger or multi-department properties, especially in Europe. Its comprehensive modules support complex operations, but it has a smaller review base and slightly less recent feedback.
RoomRaccoon is the more reviewed, highly-rated platform, ideal for small to medium hotels seeking automation, ease of use, and revenue growth tools. Its extensive integrations and user-friendly design make it the top choice for independent hoteliers.
If your focus is on a straightforward, reliable system that enhances booking efficiency and guest management, RoomRaccoon is the recommended pick. Conversely, choose ASA if you need a deeply integrated solution capable of managing multiple departments and extensive guest communication.
In summary, for most small hotels and independents, RoomRaccoon offers the better combination of ease, features, and support. Larger properties with complex needs should consider ASA’s broader modules, despite its smaller recent review footprint.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASA Hotel Software and RoomRaccoon PMS share 33 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. ASA Hotel Software and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASA Hotel Software offers 49 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASA Hotel Software: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ASA Hotelsoftware has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor