The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 245 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bowo shines when it comes to guest communication .
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Side-by-side ratings based on 245 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 51 | 194 |
After analyzing 245 verified reviews, Bowo users most value its guest communication, customization, user-friendly interface, while Crave Interactive users highlight ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Content and Design
▾
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
−
Tablet Durability
▾
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
−
WiFi and Technical Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 25 reviews | #4 30 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 19 reviews | #2 62 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 1 reviews | #1 75 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #10 0 reviews | #1 16 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 27 reviews | #2 85 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 33 reviews | #2 156 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 7 reviews | #2 49 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #5 4 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #9 1 reviews | #2 92 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 49 reviews | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #7 0 reviews | #2 6 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #4 1 reviews | #2 8 reviews |
Choosing the right in-room hotel tablet solution is crucial for elevating your guest experience and maximizing operational efficiency. Both Bowo Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive aim to modernize in-room engagement, but they diverge significantly in their approach, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a user-friendly platform with a strong local presence or a feature-rich, widely adopted system capable of extensive customization.
Both platforms address guest engagement, upselling, and operational streamlining, but each has distinct strengths. Are you looking for a solution with deeper integration and more advanced features, or one that emphasizes ease of use and regional support? Let's compare.
Bowo Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive both serve to transform the hotel guest experience with in-room tablets. Bowo offers a platform that centralizes services like check-in, communication, and entertainment, with a focus on simplicity and integration with existing hotel systems. Crave, on the other hand, emphasizes a polished user interface, extensive customization, and a broader array of features aimed at boosting revenue and guest satisfaction.
Bowo has a smaller but rapidly growing presence, primarily in Europe and North America, with 43 reviews, all recent. Crave’s larger footprint spans 22 countries, supported by 147 reviews, including recent feedback. Bowo’s high ratings (4.79/5 overall, 94% likelihood to recommend) reflect strong recent satisfaction, whereas Crave’s ratings (4.6/5 overall, 90% recommendation) are slightly lower but supported by more extensive user data. Given the recency and volume of reviews, Bowo’s current data offers a more current perspective on user satisfaction.
Both products aim to enhance guest engagement, reduce operational workload, and increase revenue. The choice boils down to whether you prefer a streamlined, easy-to-navigate system or a feature-rich platform with broader customization. Do you prioritize recent performance and user satisfaction, or a wider array of features and integrations?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use system with a focus on core guest services like in-room entertainment, basic communication, and simple upselling, Bowo is the better fit. Its intuitive interface and high ease-of-use ratings (4.69/5) make onboarding quicker and staff adoption easier, especially in boutique, luxury, or smaller hotels.
However, if your hotel requires a highly customizable platform with advanced features such as multi-lingual support, digital menus, contactless ordering, and extensive revenue-generating tools, Crave is the right choice. Crave’s feature set—offering 25 unique features compared to Bowo’s none—enables more sophisticated guest interactions, particularly in large resorts, conference hotels, or properties seeking to differentiate through digital amenities.
Hotels that prioritize simplicity, rapid deployment, and regional support should lean toward Bowo. Conversely, properties aiming for digital sophistication, extensive upselling, and multi-channel marketing should select Crave. The decision depends on your property size, guest demographic, and strategic goals.
Bowo’s interface is praised for its intuitiveness, with a 4.69/5 ease-of-use rating. Reviewers highlight that staff and guests find it straightforward to navigate, and onboarding is quick (4.66/5). Bowo’s simpler content management system is better suited for hotels wanting minimal disruption during implementation.
Crave scores slightly lower at 4.5/5, with users noting that the user interface is modern and reliable but occasionally less intuitive, especially when customizing templates or managing content updates. Its backend system, while powerful, may require more familiarization for staff.
Edge: Bowo.
Crave offers 25 exclusive features, including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, digital menus, contactless ordering, and integrated payments, making it a robust platform for upselling and guest personalization. Bowo’s feature set is more limited, with no exclusive features but 30 shared functions like in-room entertainment, communication, and basic service ordering.
Crave’s extensive feature list enables properties to implement advanced functionalities like Web-app access, QR codes, NFC, and integrated POS, appealing to larger resorts or hotels seeking full digital guest journeys. Bowo provides core features that cover basic guest engagement and operational needs but lacks some of Crave’s premium capabilities.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Bowo maintains a high customer support rating of 4.81/5, with reviews emphasizing rapid, personalized assistance and proactive engagement. Hoteliers praise Bowo’s responsiveness, especially for technical issues, and the team’s flexibility in tailoring features.
Crave’s support rating (4.6/5) is also strong, with reviews noting diligent responses and effective problem-solving. However, some users mention occasional delays in content updates and less proactive follow-up, especially for smaller or less frequent requests.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo boasts 31 verified integrations, including key partners like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Infor, offering extensive compatibility with PMS and property management tools. Crave’s 17 verified partners include notable integrations like ALICE, Amadeus, and InfoGenesis, but with fewer options overall.
The broader integration landscape makes Bowo more adaptable for properties with complex tech stacks or specific PMS requirements. Crave’s integrations are strong but more limited in scope, which may restrict customization for larger, multi-system hotels.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s recent reviews reflect a 4.79/5 rating and 94% willingness to recommend, with hoteliers in luxury and boutique segments praising its simplicity and support. Its latest reviews consistently mention quick implementation and effective communication.
Crave’s ratings (4.6/5, 90% recommendation) are slightly lower but stem from a broader, more diverse hotel base, including resorts and independent properties. Its reviews often highlight the elegant design and upselling features but note that content updates can be cumbersome.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s pricing is set at a base of $1,100, with no additional implementation or monthly fees, making it a predictable investment. Crave’s base price is $1,200, also without ongoing fees, but some users report additional costs for integrations or customizations.
While both are similar in initial cost, Bowo’s straightforward pricing structure may appeal to smaller or mid-sized hotels seeking transparency. Crave’s slightly higher price may reflect its advanced feature set and customization options.
Bowo and Crave in-room tablets both serve to enhance guest satisfaction and streamline hotel operations, but their core differences are clear. Bowo focuses on simplicity, regional support, and quick deployment, with high user satisfaction backed by recent reviews. Crave offers a broader array of advanced features and customization options, making it suitable for larger properties or those seeking digital innovation.
If your hotel values ease of use, fast onboarding, and a proven recent track record, Bowo is the better choice. Its high ratings and recent reviews support this, especially in boutique or luxury segments. Crave is preferable if your hotel aims to implement a comprehensive digital guest journey with extensive upselling and branding flexibility, despite a slightly steeper learning curve.
In summary, go with Bowo if you want a reliable, straightforward solution that’s rated highly by recent users. Opt for Crave if your hotel needs a feature-rich, fully customizable platform that can support a complex and extensive digital guest experience.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, BOWO Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive (Tablets) share 30 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We've managed to build a guest journey that's very intuitive and quite extraordinary."
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
What hoteliers love
Bowo is praised for facilitating better communication between guests and hotel staff, including features like guest feedback collection and real-time... Bowo is praised for facilitating better communication between guests and hotel staff, including features like guest feedback collection and real-time chat functionalities.
Users appreciate the high level of customization that Bowo offers, allowing them to tailor the tablet interface and available content to their specifi... Users appreciate the high level of customization that Bowo offers, allowing them to tailor the tablet interface and available content to their specific hotel brand and guest needs.
Many hoteliers commend Bowo for its intuitive and easy-to-use interface, which simplifies both guest and staff interactions. Guests find it straightfo... Many hoteliers commend Bowo for its intuitive and easy-to-use interface, which simplifies both guest and staff interactions. Guests find it straightforward to access hotel services and entertainment apps, while staff appreciate the ease of content modification.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users have pointed out that while the design and aesthetics of the app are good, there is always room for further customization and improvement t... Some users have pointed out that while the design and aesthetics of the app are good, there is always room for further customization and improvement to better meet individual hotel needs.
A few reviews mention concerns regarding the physical durability of the tablets, noting that they can be fragile and prone to malfunctions, leading to... A few reviews mention concerns regarding the physical durability of the tablets, noting that they can be fragile and prone to malfunctions, leading to additional maintenance costs.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. BOWO Guest Room Tablets and Crave Interactive (Tablets) share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. BOWO Guest Room Tablets offers 31 verified integration partners, while Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. BOWO Guest Room Tablets leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
BOWO Guest Room Tablets: No. Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bowo has an HT Score of 39 and Crave Interactive has 93. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor