The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 591 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
DJUBO shines , with exclusive features like Guest Feedback Management and Native Email Marketing.
RoomRaccoon shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
Side-by-side ratings based on 591 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 19 | 572 |
After analyzing 591 verified reviews, DJUBO users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight ease of use, customer service, continuous improvement. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Critical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing Concerns
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Database Transparency
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #31 3 reviews | #5 214 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 0 reviews | #8 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #25 0 reviews | #8 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 2 reviews | #3 245 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #31 2 reviews | #4 149 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 0 reviews | #5 70 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 0 reviews | #3 72 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #33 0 reviews | #14 11 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 445 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 3 reviews | #8 9 reviews |
| Middle East | #16 0 reviews | #17 3 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly influence your property’s efficiency and guest experience. Both DJUBO and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline operations, but they target different hotel segments and offer distinct features. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, market focus, and specific operational needs.
DJUBO is an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations and a global presence, suited for properties seeking comprehensive control. RoomRaccoon emphasizes user-friendliness and automation for small to medium-sized independent hotels. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
DJUBO, founded in 2014, is a cloud-based platform trusted by over 2,300 hotels across 21 countries, primarily serving larger properties and groups. It consolidates PMS, Channel Manager, Booking Engine, POS, and Revenue Management into a single system, simplifying complexity but requiring a more involved onboarding process. Its recent review count (19) is lower, but the older reviews are consistent and highly positive, emphasizing control and customization.
RoomRaccoon, established in 2017, is favored by thousands of small hotels, B&Bs, and independent properties worldwide, with over 484 reviews, most recent just 8 months ago. Its all-in-one system combines property management, channel management, and booking tools with automated features like AI pricing and upselling. The high review count and recent feedback indicate a more dynamic and widely adopted solution.
Both products aim to optimize operations, but DJUBO’s broader reach and integration depth make it suitable for larger or multi-location hotels. Conversely, RoomRaccoon’s intuitive design and automation appeal to smaller, growth-focused hoteliers seeking ease of use. Which one better addresses your current operational scale?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-region system with extensive integrations and control over complex operations, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its robust features like native email marketing, guest feedback management, and rules-based room assignments cater to properties that require detailed customization and real-time visibility.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, automation, and rapid onboarding, RoomRaccoon is ideal. It’s especially suitable for small to medium independent hotels that want to boost direct bookings, automate guest communications, and leverage AI-driven pricing to maximize revenue. For properties with a focus on guest experience and quick implementation, RoomRaccoon offers a compelling advantage.
In summary, choose DJUBO if you seek a comprehensive, enterprise-level platform. Opt for RoomRaccoon if you desire an easy-to-use, automated system tailored for smaller properties.
DJUBO’s interface is rated 4.95/5, with many users praising its professional appearance and functional layout. However, some reviews mention that the initial setup and learning curve can be more involved due to its extensive feature set, which may require dedicated staff training.
RoomRaccoon scores slightly higher at 4.87/5, with users emphasizing its intuitive, guest-friendly interface. The onboarding process is generally smooth, with many reviews highlighting quick learning and minimal training time, making staff adoption faster.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
DJUBO offers 10 features unique to its platform, including guest feedback management, native email marketing, direct billing, SMS communication, tablet check-in, and integrated CRS. These features cater to properties seeking detailed control, especially on operational and guest communication fronts.
RoomRaccoon provides 25 exclusive features, notably AI-powered pricing, automated upselling, multi-currency support, loyalty integrations, guest apps, shift planning, and online checkouts. Its focus on automation and guest engagement makes it highly suitable for hoteliers aiming to scale efficiently.
Shared features total 32, but RoomRaccoon’s broader suite of native and automation tools gives it a noticeable edge, particularly for small to mid-sized hotels.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
DJUBO’s support rating of 4.76/5 is slightly higher, with reviews highlighting its professional, accessible, and proactive support team. Many users appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, especially given DJUBO's complex feature set.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.74/5 rating reflects its responsive support and dedicated customer success team. Users note the patience and personalized assistance, especially during onboarding and integration phases. However, some report occasional delays, which are typically resolved quickly.
Edge: DJUBO.
RoomRaccoon boasts 88 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, HQ revenue, and Paxxio, along with over 300 in its marketplace. Its extensive integration marketplace allows for versatile connection with various booking, payment, and POS systems, making it ideal for properties seeking flexibility.
DJUBO offers only 3 verified integrations, including TripAdvisor and Simplotel, which may limit connectivity options for larger or multi-channel operations. Its more curated partner list suits hotels with specific, established integrations in mind.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
With 484 reviews, RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.95/5 and recent feedback from small hotel operators highlight its high satisfaction levels. Independent hoteliers especially praise its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth achievements like increased RevPAR and direct bookings.
DJUBO’s 19 reviews, primarily from larger or multi-location hotels, rate it very highly at 5/5 but with less recent feedback. Its complexity and control appeal to enterprise-level properties, but fewer recent reviews suggest less current user experience data.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
DJUBO does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke quote based on your property size and needs. It typically involves a licensing fee, and implementation costs may apply, reflecting its enterprise focus.
RoomRaccoon charges a base fee of $1,000, with no mention of additional licensing or setup costs. Its pricing model aligns with small to medium properties seeking transparent, predictable costs without hidden fees.
Overall, RoomRaccoon’s straightforward pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI, especially for smaller hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited staff resources or a focus on rapid, simple implementation.
Not ideal if your hotel operates across multiple regions with highly complex, customized operational needs that demand extensive control.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution with broad control, suited for larger or multi-location hotels that need a customizable, scalable platform. Its robust integrations, detailed features, and strong support cater to properties with complex operational demands.
RoomRaccoon excels in simplicity, automation, and rapid onboarding, making it highly attractive for small to medium independent hotels focused on growth and guest experience. Its more extensive native features and recent reviews suggest it is the preferred choice for properties prioritizing ease of use and direct revenue enhancement.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable platform and your team has the resources for a detailed setup, DJUBO is the better fit. However, if you want a user-friendly, automation-rich system that helps you grow efficiently, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner.
Hotel Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Djubo and RoomRaccoon HMS share 32 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest Feedback Management | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Tariffs |
Showing top differences. 23 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users praise RoomRaccoon for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which reduces training time and allows smooth integration into dai... Many users praise RoomRaccoon for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which reduces training time and allows smooth integration into daily operations, thereby improving overall efficiency.
While some users commend the support team's responsiveness and expertise, others criticize the lack of after-sales care and response efficiency, indic... While some users commend the support team's responsiveness and expertise, others criticize the lack of after-sales care and response efficiency, indicating inconsistencies in customer service quality.
Users appreciate RoomRaccoon's ongoing development, including AI enhancements, which have contributed to improved sales and operational function, show... Users appreciate RoomRaccoon's ongoing development, including AI enhancements, which have contributed to improved sales and operational function, showcasing commitment to long-term adaptability.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews point out critical issues such as ineffective after-sales support and unresolved technical problems, significantly affecting user sati... Several reviews point out critical issues such as ineffective after-sales support and unresolved technical problems, significantly affecting user satisfaction and trust in the system.
The system's pricing is seen as steep by some users, especially those with seasonal businesses, impacting their decision-making despite the perceived... The system's pricing is seen as steep by some users, especially those with seasonal businesses, impacting their decision-making despite the perceived value of included features.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Djubo and RoomRaccoon HMS share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Djubo offers 3 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon HMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Djubo leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Djubo: No. RoomRaccoon HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. DJUBO has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 86. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor