The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 37 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
hub OS shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Web-app and Room Service Ordering.
Liverton shines , with exclusive features like Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Lobby Kiosk.
Side-by-side ratings based on 37 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 7 |
After analyzing 37 verified reviews, hub OS users most value its inter-department communication, maintenance management, user interface (ui), while Liverton users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Inter-department Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Maintenance Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface (UI)
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #14 1 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 19 reviews | #22 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 7 reviews | #15 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #10 2 reviews | #14 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 17 reviews | #24 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 13 reviews | #19 3 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 14 reviews | #19 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #8 3 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #16 2 reviews | #21 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 21 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #15 0 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #6 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guest Services by SmartStay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both address guest engagement, but Hub OS offers a contactless communication platform primarily focused on operational management, while SmartStay centers on digital check-in, upselling, and in-room service features. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize streamlined internal communication or elevating the guest experience with upselling and in-room tech.
Given the current landscape, which product aligns better with your property’s strategic goals and operational challenges?
Both products aim to improve hotel operations and guest satisfaction, yet they serve different core functions. Hub OS Guest in Touch emphasizes real-time communication between guests and staff, focusing on incident reporting, maintenance, and departmental coordination, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational cohesion. Conversely, Guest Services by SmartStay concentrates on digital guest onboarding, upselling, and in-room services, making it suitable for properties keen on enhancing the guest journey, especially with mobile and self-service features.
While Hub OS has a higher overall rating (4.69/5) and more recent reviews, it primarily excels at internal management with limited guest-facing features. SmartStay, despite a lower rating (0/5) due to fewer reviews, offers a broad suite of features like contactless check-in, digital ordering, and upselling. Which of these core functions aligns better with your current priorities?
If your hotel needs a robust system to streamline incident management, departmental communication, and maintenance workflows, Hub OS is the clear choice. Its high review count (27 reviews) and recent positive feedback underscore its reliability for operational tasks.
If your hotel aims to elevate the guest experience through digital check-in, room selection, upselling, and in-room ordering, then SmartStay’s platform is more aligned. Despite fewer reviews, its comprehensive feature set for guest engagement makes it a compelling option for tech-forward properties.
Your decision should hinge on whether operational efficiency or guest experience enhancement is your priority—both are critical, but one may serve your immediate goals better.
Hub OS scores 4.87/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and simple onboarding process. Users mention that staff quickly adapt, highlighting the platform’s user-friendly design and real-time feedback features, though some note occasional crashes and synchronization issues.
SmartStay’s platform scores 4.57/5, with praise for its clean, tidy interface and smooth onboarding. Reviewers appreciate its straightforwardness, despite limited overall review volume.
Edge: Hub OS, due to higher review volume and slightly better user ratings, indicating broader user confidence in its usability.
Hub OS offers 3 unique features: a web app, room service ordering, and request management, focusing on operational communication. Its core strengths lie in incident tracking and departmental coordination, ideal for hotels prioritizing internal workflows.
SmartStay boasts 20 features, including a hotel website check-in portal, lobby kiosk, self-service check-in/out, device agnosticism, custom questions, document scanning, ID verification, multilingual support, payment processing, and door lock integration. These features support a comprehensive guest journey and in-room experience.
Given the sheer number of features, SmartStay provides a more extensive guest-facing toolkit.
Edge: SmartStay, due to its broader suite of features designed to elevate guest engagement and operational integration.
Hub OS receives a 4.74/5 support rating, with reviews highlighting quick, proactive responses and attentive customer service. Users appreciate that the support team is highly involved and resolves issues swiftly, ensuring minimal disruption.
SmartStay’s support rating is slightly lower at 4.29/5, with reviews describing the team as knowledgeable and responsive but noting occasional disagreements or minor delays.
Edge: Hub OS, because of its higher support rating and more positive recent review sentiment.
Hub OS integrates with 23 verified partners, including major PMS, POS, and distribution systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and RMS. Its extensive partner network facilitates seamless operational workflows and data sharing.
SmartStay connects with 8 verified partners, including Shiji Group and Cloudbeds. While its integration ecosystem is smaller, it covers key systems like PMS and POS, with ongoing future plans.
Edge: Hub OS, thanks to its significantly larger and more diverse integration footprint, offering broader connectivity.
Hub OS’s 27 reviews, predominantly from various hotel types, yield an average rating of 4.69/5, with a 97% likelihood to recommend. Reviewers from luxury, boutique, and resort hotels praise its operational impact and ease of use.
SmartStay has only 7 reviews with an overall rating of 0, making its data less reliable. The limited feedback suggests a need for more user input to gauge true satisfaction.
Edge: Hub OS, with more recent reviews and a higher, more consistent rating across segments.
Hub OS does not publicly disclose pricing, implying its cost may be customized based on hotel size and needs, often typical for enterprise solutions.
SmartStay charges a base price of $500 per month, with no indication of tiered pricing or additional fees. Its transparent pricing simplifies budgeting for smaller or mid-sized hotels.
If precise costs are critical, Hub OS’s custom quotes may be a barrier, while SmartStay’s flat fee offers clarity.
Not ideal if you prioritize guest-facing technology over internal communication or have a small property with simple operations.
Not ideal if your hotel does not prioritize digital guest interactions or lacks the infrastructure for mobile-focused services.
Hub OS’s strength lies in operational management, with high-quality incident reporting and departmental coordination. Its broader integration network and higher user ratings make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking efficiency and internal communication.
SmartStay excels in guest engagement, offering a broad suite of features to enhance the guest journey through digital check-in, upselling, and in-room services. Its lower rating and fewer reviews suggest it may still be maturing, but the feature set is promising for future growth.
If your primary goal is operational efficiency, Hub OS is the safer, more proven option. If elevating guest experience and generating ancillary revenue are your priorities, SmartStay offers a compelling, feature-rich platform worth monitoring.
In conclusion, choose Hub OS if your hotel needs a trusted system for internal communication and maintenance. Opt for SmartStay if your focus is on creating a modern, interactive guest journey with upselling and in-room service capabilities. Both have their merits, but current data and review volume favor Hub OS as the more established solution.
According to HTR's product database, Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guest Services by SmartStay share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| Hotel Website Check-in Portal | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Self Service Checkin | ||
| Self Service Checkout | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks am... Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks among teams, leading to coordinated efforts and improved service delivery. This feature has greatly enhanced the overall operational flow.
Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and op... Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and operational inefficiencies. The software allows teams to track and communicate maintenance issues in real-time, leading to faster problem-solving.
While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or dela... While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or delays. Despite these hiccups, users still appreciate how the software simplifies complex tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface er... A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface errors. While these issues are generally resolved quickly, they can still disrupt hotel operations.
Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting is... Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting issues and accessing important data quickly, thereby saving time and improving overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guest Services by SmartStay share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Hub OS Guest in Touch offers 23 verified integration partners, while Guest Services by SmartStay offers 8. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hub OS Guest in Touch leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hub OS Guest in Touch: No. Guest Services by SmartStay: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. hub OS has an HT Score of 22 and Liverton has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor