The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 226 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MeetingPackage shines in Ease of Use and Customer Support.
Thynk shines in ease of use and intuitive hotel workflow design — especially for casino properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and Pipeline CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 226 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 80 | 146 |
After analyzing 226 verified reviews, MeetingPackage users most value its collaborative partnership and responsive vendor team, continuous product improvement and fast innovation, operational efficiency and faster processing, while Thynk users highlight ease of use and intuitive hotel workflow design, analytics, dashboards, and reporting, centralized sales, crm, and reservation data. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Collaborative partnership and responsive vendor team
▾
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive hotel workflow design
▾
|
|
+
Continuous product improvement and fast innovation
▾
|
+
Analytics, dashboards, and reporting
▾
|
|
+
Operational efficiency and faster processing
▾
|
+
Centralized sales, CRM, and reservation data
▾
|
|
+
Customer journey and conversion improvement
▾
|
+
Efficiency in group enquiries, proposals, and follow-up
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Admin permissions and profile matching
▾
|
−
Pricing, packages, and revenue optimization gaps
▾
|
|
−
RFP flow and onboarding experience
▾
|
−
Training, onboarding, and guidance for new users
▾
|
|
−
Integration and connectivity with hotel systems
▾
|
−
Booking edits, room blocking, and availability handling limits
▾
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Sales Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 7 reviews | #6 6 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 30 reviews | #4 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 22 reviews | #2 52 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 17 reviews | #3 11 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 36 reviews | #5 34 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 17 reviews | #3 60 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #3 45 reviews | #5 42 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 3 reviews | #2 20 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 7 reviews | #6 15 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #2 66 reviews | #3 66 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 0 reviews | #1 6 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 5 reviews | #1 23 reviews |
MeetingPackage and Thynk both address the challenge of managing group, meeting, and event sales for hotels, but they diverge sharply in scope and operational focus. MeetingPackage excels as an AI-driven inbound RFP automation tool built specifically to reduce manual enquiry handling for Groups, Meetings & Events sales teams. It automates reading, extracting, and following up on requests with minimal human effort, which benefits teams overwhelmed by inbound sales admin. Thynk, on the other hand, positions itself as a 360-degree group sales platform that unifies the entire sales lifecycle, including CRM, contract management, and payment processing across hotel portfolios, making it better suited for multi-property groups needing a comprehensive sales hub.
Both products solve the problem of slow, fragmented group sales workflows by automating enquiry processing and centralizing data, but MeetingPackage targets single-property or smaller group teams focused on event enquiry automation. Thynk suits hotel groups requiring end-to-end sales lifecycle management, deeper CRM functionality, and centralized reporting across multiple sites.
If your property primarily struggles with high volumes of inbound RFP emails and needs to automate enquiry intake and follow-up quickly, especially for multi-day meetings and corporate agreements, MeetingPackage’s AI-driven automation and “human takeover” option are highly rated. This is supported by 80 reviews with a 4.6 overall rating and top marks for ease of use (4.7) and customer support (4.8). The system’s ability to parse inbound requests and reduce manual entry is ideal for hotels with dedicated meeting/event sales teams.
Conversely, if you run a multi-property group or a larger hotel portfolio needing a unified sales platform that combines CRM, contract management, task workflows, and analytics to manage complex event sales cycles, Thynk’s more complete feature set and 127 reviews (4.4 overall rating) make it a better fit. Thynk’s 11 recent reviews in the last six months hold a 4.6 average, indicating strong current performance. Its CRM, pipeline management, and document customization features are unmatched by MeetingPackage, which lacks these.
For smaller independent hotels focusing mainly on inbound enquiry automation without the need for extensive CRM or contract workflows, MeetingPackage is preferable based on user feedback and feature alignment. For hotel groups requiring comprehensive sales lifecycle management and CRM integration, Thynk is the stronger choice, particularly if you value pipeline reporting and mobile sales CRM.
MeetingPackage leads ease of use with a 4.7 rating compared to Thynk’s 4.4. Its onboarding score similarly outpaces Thynk’s by 0.3 points (4.6 vs 4.3). Reviewers frequently highlight MeetingPackage’s intuitive interface and simplicity in automating enquiries, with comments like “Booking engine is easy to use” and “short reaction time of support team.” MeetingPackage’s AI also reduces manual tasks, easing staff adoption.
Thynk users find the platform practical and aligned with hotel workflows but note a steeper learning curve. Comments mention that new users require one to two weeks to become proficient, and some desire more tutorials and step-by-step guides. The platform’s broader functionality contributes to complexity, which can slow initial adoption.
Edge: MeetingPackage.
Thynk offers 10 unique features MeetingPackage lacks, including Contact Management/CRM, Meal Planning, Content & File Management, Itinerary Printouts, Client Communication Portal, Task Management, Customizable BEO, Proposal and Contract Documents, Contract Management, Pipeline CRM, and Mobile Sales CRM. These features transform how sales and event teams manage client relationships, proposals, contracts, and workflows across multiple properties, enabling a full sales lifecycle from inquiry to payment.
MeetingPackage’s differentiation lies in its AI-driven automation of inbound RFPs, reading emails, extracting booking details, sending follow-ups, and suggesting sister venues. This automation significantly reduces manual enquiry handling but does not extend to CRM or contract management.
Given that MeetingPackage has no exclusive features beyond those shared with Thynk, and Thynk’s unique features support critical sales and event management workflows, Thynk has the feature advantage.
Edge: Thynk.
MeetingPackage scores 4.8 for customer support and 4.6 for onboarding, outperforming Thynk’s 4.4 in both categories by a margin greater than 0.3 points, qualifying for an edge. Reviewers praise MeetingPackage’s “short reaction time of support team” and describe the support as “very friendly, easily accessible,” with several noting that the team implements user feedback promptly.
Thynk’s support is described as “exceptionally professional and quick,” but some users report delays, including one review citing a three-month unresolved technical issue. While many users appreciate Thynk’s support quality, the consistency and responsiveness appear stronger in MeetingPackage reviews.
Edge: MeetingPackage.
MeetingPackage has 15 verified integrations, while Thynk has 13. Both share six partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Stripe, and Planet, which cover key PMS and payment platforms. MeetingPackage’s unique partners include apaleo GmbH, Lighthouse, The Hotels Network, IDeaS, Amadeus, Event Temple, IVvy, Backyou.io, and Visual Matrix PMS—important for hotels needing cutting-edge PMS connectivity and revenue management integration.
Thynk’s unique integrations include Stayntouch, Get Into More, hconnect, Sertifi by Flywire, Spazious, Cendyn, and Proposales, which focus more on event content management, contract e-signature, and sales proposal automation.
For hotels prioritizing PMS and revenue management connectivity, MeetingPackage offers more integrations. Thynk’s integrations expand on sales and event contracting workflows. The 15-to-13 difference is less than 25%, so no edge is warranted.
Edge: Even.
MeetingPackage holds a 4.6/5 overall rating across 80 reviews, while Thynk has a slightly lower 4.4/5 from 127 reviews. However, Thynk’s last six months’ average rating is 4.6/5 across 11 reviews, indicating improved recent performance compared to its overall rating. MeetingPackage’s recent review count is only 4, below the 10-review threshold for stable rating analysis, making its current rating less reliable.
Segment ratings show MeetingPackage scores highest in Boutique Hotels (4.7/5, 40 reviews), City Center Hotels (4.7/5, 45), and Branded Hotels (4.6/5, 46). Thynk scores highest in Extended Stay & Serviced Apartments (4.7/5, 21 reviews) and Casinos (4.9/5, 5 reviews). Both products have solid ratings across luxury and resort segments, but MeetingPackage has more reviews in Boutique and City Center Hotels.
Given MeetingPackage’s higher overall rating and excellent scores in common hotel segments, and Thynk’s stronger recent rating but fewer reviews, the edge for overall rating is even.
Edge: Even.
MeetingPackage charges a base price of $200 with no implementation fee, freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing published. Thynk’s base price is $600, also without any published implementation fee or freemium model. Neither product offers a trial.
MeetingPackage’s lower base cost makes it more accessible for smaller properties or teams focused on enquiry automation. Thynk’s higher price reflects its more comprehensive feature set and portfolio-wide sales management capabilities.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
MeetingPackage and Thynk cater to different segments of the hotel sales market through distinct operational approaches. MeetingPackage focuses on AI-powered automation of inbound group sales enquiries, significantly reducing manual admin and enabling sales teams to concentrate on closing deals. Thynk provides a comprehensive sales management ecosystem uniting CRM, contracts, task workflows, and payments for multi-property portfolios.
Choose MeetingPackage if your hotel or small group prioritizes speedy automation of complex meeting and event enquiries, values ease of use (ease of use 4.7 vs 4.4), and requires responsive support (customer support 4.8 vs 4.4). Its integrations with major PMS and automation features address the core needs of properties overwhelmed by enquiry handling.
Choose Thynk if your portfolio demands complete sales lifecycle management, including CRM and contract workflows, pipeline reporting, and mobile sales tools. Its unique features like customizable BEOs and client communication portals make it ideal for hotel groups managing multiple properties and complex sales processes. Despite a slightly lower overall rating (4.4 vs 4.6), Thynk’s recent reviews show improving satisfaction (4.6 last 6 months) and extensive feature depth.
Edge calls: MeetingPackage leads in ease of use and customer support; Thynk leads in feature set. Overall rating and integrations are even. Your choice depends on whether AI-powered inbound enquiry automation or full sales lifecycle management aligns best with your property’s sales model.
Hotel Sales Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $600/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Sales CRM
|
|
|
| Mobile Sales CRM | ||
| Workflow Automations | ||
| Pipeline CRM | ||
| BEO Management | ||
| Lead Scoring | ||
| Contact Management | ||
|
▾
RPF Management
|
|
|
| Workflow Automations | ||
|
▾
F&B Planning
|
|
|
| File & Document Management | ||
| BEO Management | ||
|
▾
Contracts & E-Signatures
|
|
|
| Workflow Automations | ||
| Payments & Invoicing | ||
| File & Document Management | ||
| E-Signatures | ||
| Contract Management | ||
|
▾
Reporting & Analytics
|
|
|
| Chain Dashboard | ||
| Data Migration Services | ||
| Pace, Sales Activity, and GRC Reporting | ||
| Lead Scoring |
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The biggest asset of MeetingPackage is automation. Our small team has limited time to answer every RFP, and this online rate and availability tool makes rate shopping as straightfo..."
"Co-Pilot has taken a lot of the manual data entry out of reservations, and Room Block Manager gives us a clear view of our groups. Both teams now play a real part in the sales proc..."
"I believe the most significant benefit for both our customers and employees is the ability to save time and book with confidence."
"As we were expanding, it was crucial to optimize our processes. We were way back when it came to the industry on the topic of digitalization. I think a lot happened during the pand..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The system works great for multi-properties and a big advantage for us is the combination with salesforce. We have CRM+Events now in single system. Furthermore processes are tailo..."
What hoteliers love
Users repeatedly describe MeetingPackage as a true partner: the team is friendly, available, solution-oriented, and quick to respond. Hotels value the... Users repeatedly describe MeetingPackage as a true partner: the team is friendly, available, solution-oriented, and quick to respond. Hotels value the collaborative approach because it helps them work through requirements, improve outcomes, and move the product forward together.
Many reviews highlight that MeetingPackage evolves quickly through regular releases, enhancements, and iteration based on feedback. Buyers see this as... Many reviews highlight that MeetingPackage evolves quickly through regular releases, enhancements, and iteration based on feedback. Buyers see this as important because it keeps the platform aligned with changing hotel needs and helps deliver long-term business value, though a few want tighter communication around changes.
Reviewers note that MeetingPackage improves efficiency through fast processing, better workflow speed, and automation-oriented enhancements. Hotels vi... Reviewers note that MeetingPackage improves efficiency through fast processing, better workflow speed, and automation-oriented enhancements. Hotels view this as a way to reduce manual effort and increase responsiveness across sales and service operations.
Where hoteliers push back
One review highlights limitations in admin permissions, noting that only one person can create users, and asks for better profile matching. These gaps... One review highlights limitations in admin permissions, noting that only one person can create users, and asks for better profile matching. These gaps matter for hotels that need more flexible internal administration and more accurate customer or account matching.
A few reviews call out the need to improve hotel onboarding and refine the RFP flow. These comments suggest that while the platform is promising, smoo... A few reviews call out the need to improve hotel onboarding and refine the RFP flow. These comments suggest that while the platform is promising, smoother setup and better request handling would make adoption easier and the experience more mature.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Several reviewers describe Thynk as intuitive, practical, and aligned with how hoteliers actually work. They value that it supports hotel sales workfl... Several reviewers describe Thynk as intuitive, practical, and aligned with how hoteliers actually work. They value that it supports hotel sales workflows efficiently, though a few note the system can still feel technical or not fully user-friendly in complex scenarios.
Users appreciate Thynk’s reporting and dashboard capabilities for tracking pipeline, conversion, production, and sales performance. Several reviewers... Users appreciate Thynk’s reporting and dashboard capabilities for tracking pipeline, conversion, production, and sales performance. Several reviewers say the analytics help management make better decisions and can reveal untapped revenue opportunities, especially when comparing production across hotels or segments.
Users most often praise Thynk for bringing corporate accounts, group business, contacts, bookings, and reservations into one platform. This shared vie... Users most often praise Thynk for bringing corporate accounts, group business, contacts, bookings, and reservations into one platform. This shared view helps sales and reservations teams work from the same information, improve coordination, and avoid disconnected workflows across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviewers want more flexibility around pricing, especially dynamic pricing for meeting rooms, packages, and tour operator contracts. The current setup... Reviewers want more flexibility around pricing, especially dynamic pricing for meeting rooms, packages, and tour operator contracts. The current setup appears to support basic sales workflows, but some hotels see missed revenue potential because complex rate changes, allotment tracking, and product pricing are not fully built out.
Some users say the platform can feel complex at the start and would benefit from more tutorials, step-by-step guides, or support materials. This sugge... Some users say the platform can feel complex at the start and would benefit from more tutorials, step-by-step guides, or support materials. This suggests the product is powerful, but hotels may need stronger onboarding to get teams productive quickly.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. MeetingPackage (Venue & Sales Management) and Thynk Groups & Events share many core Hotel Sales Software features, but each has unique capabilities. MeetingPackage (Venue & Sales Management) offers 15 verified integration partners, while Thynk Groups & Events offers 13. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MeetingPackage (Venue & Sales Management) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
MeetingPackage (Venue & Sales Management): No. Thynk Groups & Events: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Sales Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MeetingPackage has an HT Score of 86 and Thynk has 93. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property