The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 222 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Portier shines .
STAY shines in ease of use and ROI — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 222 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 7 | 215 |
After analyzing 222 verified reviews, Portier users most value its , while STAY users highlight guest experience optimization, mobile and user experience, operational efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Experience Optimization
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile and User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Service
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
CMS and Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #16 3 reviews | #9 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #23 4 reviews | #4 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 89 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 24 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 77 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #17 4 reviews | #2 88 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #22 2 reviews | #3 112 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 5 reviews | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #7 2 reviews |
Your hotel is evaluating guest engagement platforms to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Portier by Portier and STAY Guest App aim to digitize communication and service delivery, but they differ significantly in scope, reach, and maturity. While both products serve similar core functions, understanding their strengths and limitations will help you choose the right fit for your property.
Portier emphasizes guest engagement via hotel-branded smartphones and has a smaller but highly specialized user base, primarily in the Asia Pacific, Europe, and Middle East. Conversely, STAY boasts a broader market presence, with a proven track record across 67 countries and over 1,000 hotels, making it a more established choice for international brands and larger operations.
Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, regional needs, and digital ambitions?
Portier has a higher overall rating at 4.71/5 based on just 7 reviews, but its limited recent review activity weakens confidence in its current performance. STAY, with 206 reviews and a 3/5 overall rating, commands a stronger market presence with recent feedback from numerous hotels, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Given the volume, recent reviews, and extensive integration options, STAY is the better option for hotels seeking a mature, scalable guest app. Portier might appeal if your hotel values a boutique, personalized engagement system, but its smaller ecosystem limits flexibility.
Edge: STAY.
Both Portier and STAY aim to improve guest communication and operational efficiency through digital means. Portier centers around hotel-branded smartphones, allowing staff to push messages, facilitate guest engagement, and improve ancillary revenues, especially in boutique or villa settings. STAY offers a full-featured mobile app and web interface, supporting a wide array of digital services, reservations, and integrations.
Where Portier excels is in creating an emotional bond through dedicated smartphones, fostering direct, personal communication. STAY, however, provides a more comprehensive, multi-channel experience, integrating with existing hotel systems and offering detailed analytics.
Are you prioritizing personalized guest touchpoints or broad operational digitization?
Edge: STAY.
If your hotel needs a guest engagement platform focused on direct, personal communication via hotel smartphones, Portier is a good fit. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, villas, or properties heavily invested in guest messaging and ancillary revenue through personal devices.
If, however, your hotel requires a scalable platform supporting multiple services—reservations, requests, notifications—and seamless integration with PMS, STAY is the better choice. Its extensive feature set, proven track record, and global presence make it suitable for branded hotels, resorts, and chains looking to digitize the entire guest journey.
For properties focused on digital transformation at scale, STAY's broader capabilities outweigh Portier’s personalized approach.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s user experience has an average rating of 4.43/5, noted for its well-designed functions but some limitations in smartphone features at the front desk. Its onboarding is rated 4.7/5, indicating a smooth initial setup, but reviews mention technical issues like signal problems and battery drain.
STAY surpasses in ease of use with a 4.78/5 rating and an intuitive interface praised in over 200 recent reviews. Hotels highlight its straightforward CMS, fast setup, and minimal staff training needed, even in complex operations.
Edge: STAY.
Portier offers core features like guest messaging, push notifications, and basic engagement tools. It lacks dedicated modules like chatbot, request management, or message routing, limiting customization.
STAY provides 7 unique features not available in Portier, including a mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, message routing, web app, request management, and app download. These features enable more flexible, automated, and detailed guest interactions, catering to diverse operational needs.
In feature depth and variety, STAY’s broader suite gives your hotel much more control and automation.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s support and onboarding ratings are 4.86/5 and 4.7/5 respectively, based on limited reviews. Users appreciate its dedicated assistance but note occasional technical glitches and limited functions at the front desk.
STAY’s customer support is similarly rated at 4.83/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and ongoing support. Some feedback points to limited phone support and regional support hours, but overall, the support experience is highly regarded.
Given the larger user base and recent reviews, STAY’s support infrastructure is more robust and proven.
Edge: STAY.
Portier currently has zero verified integration partners, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems. This restricts scalability and automation options for your hotel.
STAY boasts integrations with 20 verified partners, including Hotelkit, Apaleo, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and SiteMinder, enabling smooth data flow and operational automation. Its open API allows for further customization, making it adaptable to your existing tech stack.
For hotel operations that rely on a variety of systems, STAY’s extensive integrations provide a significant advantage.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s only 7 reviews—none recent—offer a limited snapshot. The high ratings from those reviews (all 5/5) reflect a niche appeal, mainly from boutique hotels and villas in Europe and Asia, with an overall rating of 4.71/5.
STAY, with over 200 reviews, has a more diverse property base, including luxury hotels, resorts, and chains across multiple continents. Its overall rating of 3/5 is lower but reflects recent, detailed feedback emphasizing operational benefits and areas for improvement.
Given the volume and recency, STAY’s ratings are more representative of current user experiences.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s pricing details are not publicly available, and it does not offer a freemium or trial model. Its cost structure might be customized or unavailable, which could complicate budgeting.
STAY charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup fees, and no free tier or trial. This transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI and compare with other solutions.
For budgeting clarity, STAY’s fixed monthly fee simplifies financial planning.
Edge: STAY.
Not ideal if your hotel needs wide system integrations, scalable digital services, or multi-channel communication.
Limited to boutique and smaller properties focused on personalized engagement.
Not ideal if your property prefers a simple, single-device engagement system or has very limited budgets.
Best suited for mid-sized to large hotels, brands, and resorts seeking extensive digital transformation.
Portier offers a niche, smartphone-based guest engagement system with a high satisfaction rating but limited recent activity and integrations. It’s suitable for boutique hotels prioritizing personalized communication and ancillary services.
STAY, on the other hand, has a proven, extensive feature set, strong global presence, and broad integration capabilities, with over 200 recent reviews supporting its reliability and scalability. It is the better choice for most hotels looking to digitize their guest experience at scale.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, flexible platform with proven results, STAY is the clear winner. Portier might work if you prioritize personal touch and are comfortable with a smaller ecosystem.
According to HTR's product database, Portier and STAY Guest App share 7 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Web-app |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information... Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information and services. Features like real-time updates, mobile service ordering, and the ability to make restaurant reservations reduce wait times and provide convenience.
The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and man... The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and manage content, whether they are hotel staff or guests.
STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front de... STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front desk lines. The tool facilitates sustainable practices by digitizing traditional paper-based services, aiding hotels in their sustainability goals.
Where hoteliers push back
The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more f... The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more flexibility in design and functionality.
Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrati... Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrations streamline data management and help provide a seamless experience for both staff and guests.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Portier and STAY Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Portier offers 0 verified integration partners, while STAY Guest App offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAY Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Portier: No. STAY Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Portier has an HT Score of 0 and STAY has 47. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor