The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 380 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Guestnet shines when it comes to user-friendly interface , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Payments.
STAY shines when it comes to guest experience optimization — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 380 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 165 | 215 |
After analyzing 380 verified reviews, Guestnet users most value its user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, positive guest experience, while STAY users highlight guest experience optimization, mobile and user experience, support and service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
Guest Experience Optimization
▾
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
+
Mobile and User Experience
▾
|
|
+
Positive Guest Experience
▾
|
+
Support and Service
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Flexibility and Adaptability
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
−
CMS and Customization
▾
|
|
−
Integration with External Systems
▾
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
−
Push Notifications and Alerts
▾
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 56 reviews | #9 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 85 reviews | #4 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 2 reviews | #2 89 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #23 0 reviews | #2 24 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 52 reviews | #2 77 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #3 66 reviews | #2 88 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 18 reviews | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 14 reviews | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #13 3 reviews | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #2 158 reviews | #3 112 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 0 reviews | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #7 2 reviews |
Choosing between Guestnet by Guestnet and STAY Guest App by STAY hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational size, and guest engagement goals. Both products aim to improve guest communication and streamline hotel services but approach these objectives differently. Guestnet offers a more comprehensive, customizable solution with a focus on integration and upselling, while STAY emphasizes operational efficiency and ease of use. Which solution aligns better with your priorities?
Guestnet’s robust feature set and higher industry recognition position it as a strong contender for hotels seeking deep integration and personalized digital experiences. STAY, with its user-friendly interface and proven track record with large hotel chains, excels at simplifying service delivery and operational workflows. Are you ready to compare these solutions in detail?
Guestnet and STAY both address the need to digitize guest interactions, but their core strengths differ. Guestnet’s platform is fully customizable, supporting multi-channel publishing, PMS integration, and features like mobile check-in and payments. Its focus on personalized, integrated communication enhances guest engagement, particularly for luxury and boutique hotels.
STAY, however, concentrates on operational efficiency, reducing front desk queues and enabling real-time updates via a mobile app, ideal for large chains and resorts aiming to streamline service and reduce costs. While Guestnet’s reviews are mostly older and less recent, its overall higher rating suggests a more established reputation. Which approach best matches your hotel’s digital strategy?
If your hotel needs a flexible, integrated guest platform that supports upselling, digital compendiums, and multiple communication channels, Guestnet is the better fit. Its strong PMS and third-party integrations, along with features like mobile check-in and payments, make it ideal for hotels prioritizing personalized guest experiences and digital engagement.
Meanwhile, if operational efficiency, reducing queue times, and simplifying staff workflows are your priorities, STAY’s intuitive app and automation features serve that purpose well. It’s especially suited for large hotel groups that want streamlined service and robust analytics. Given the recent reviews, Guestnet’s higher scores suggest a more trusted solution for sophisticated, personalized guest journeys.
Guestnet scores slightly higher in ease of use at 4.74/5 compared to STAY’s 4.78/5, indicating both platforms are intuitive. Guestnet’s onboarding process is rated 4.66/5, praised for its customization, but some users note that complex integrations can require IT support, which might pose challenges for smaller teams.
STAY’s interface is simple and user-friendly, with a CMS praised for its straightforward content management and quick content updates. Its implementation is described as intuitive, especially for large hotel chains already familiar with digital systems. Overall, STAY’s focus on simplicity translates into faster staff adoption. Edge: STAY.
Guestnet boasts 12 unique features, including mobile check-in and payments, alongside core services like multi-channel publishing, PMS integration, and guest communication. It also offers digital compendiums and upselling tools, making it a comprehensive platform for personalized guest engagement.
STAY provides 10 core features, emphasizing operational automation, real-time updates, and service digitization. Unique features include chatbots, automated replies, and message routing, tailored for enhancing operational workflows.
While Guestnet offers more features overall, STAY’s focus on automation and service efficiency makes it more suitable for large-scale operations. Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s support scores a remarkable 4.82/5, with reviews highlighting fast, helpful responses and proactive onboarding assistance. Users mention that Guestnet’s support team is always available to troubleshoot and help customize the platform, fostering high confidence.
STAY’s support is equally rated at 4.83/5, with users praising its quick, friendly help and effective issue resolution. Some reviews note that support hours are limited in certain regions, but overall, both vendors deliver excellent service.
Given the slightly higher recency and volume of positive feedback, STAY’s customer support edges out slightly. Edge: STAY.
Guestnet and STAY each integrate with 20 verified partners, including common integrations like Mews, enhancing their interoperability. Guestnet’s exclusive integrations include ASA Hotelsoftware, Hotelkit, and Websline, offering deep customization for PMS and service systems.
STAY’s unique integrations include hotelkit, apaleo, and Oracle Hospitality, enabling extensive automation and data flow across platforms. Both systems are well-connected but Guestnet’s broader range of niche integrations favors hotels with complex digital ecosystems.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s review score of 0/5 in overall rating reflects a significant gap, but this appears to be a data anomaly or outdated. The more recent and numerous reviews (206 from STAY vs. 152 for Guestnet) suggest STAY’s higher trust and satisfaction rating.
STAY’s reviews emphasize operational simplicity, real-time updates, and quick service, especially appreciated by large hotel groups. Guestnet, despite a high HTR score, has limited recent reviews, making STAY the more trusted choice today.
Edge: STAY.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no trial or freemium options. Its higher price point reflects its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, suitable for hotels with larger budgets and complex needs.
STAY’s base price is $300 per month, also without a trial, but offers a more affordable entry point for hotels seeking essential automation and guest engagement tools. Its lower cost combined with ease of implementation makes it attractive for mid-sized and large hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers quick implementation over customization or has a limited digital infrastructure.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or complex integrations beyond automation.
Guestnet offers a highly customizable, fully integrated platform designed for personalized guest engagement, especially beneficial for boutique or luxury hotels. Its extensive features and industry recognition make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate their digital guest experience and upsell effectively.
STAY focuses on operational efficiency, reducing wait times, and simplifying staff workflows, making it perfect for large hotel groups and resorts that prioritize seamless service delivery. Its user-friendly design and proven success with major chains underscore its value in streamlining hotel operations.
If your goal is a sophisticated, personalized guest journey with deep integrations, Guestnet is the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel needs to improve operational workflows and provide instant updates with minimal complexity, STAY is the better option.
In conclusion, prioritize Guestnet if you seek customization and high engagement; choose STAY if operational efficiency and ease of use are your main goals. Both platforms are capable, but the current data favors STAY for reliability and recent performance.
According to HTR's product database, Guestnet and STAY Guest App share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Payments |
We analyzed 15 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
What hoteliers love
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
Many reviewers report enhanced guest satisfaction due to quick access to hotel services and amenities through Guestnet, leading to positive feedback a... Many reviewers report enhanced guest satisfaction due to quick access to hotel services and amenities through Guestnet, leading to positive feedback and potentially increased return visits.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Reviewers appreciate Guestnet's integrations with local tourism data and hotel management systems, though some mention a desire for further integratio... Reviewers appreciate Guestnet's integrations with local tourism data and hotel management systems, though some mention a desire for further integration to enhance automation and reduce manual tasks.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information... Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information and services. Features like real-time updates, mobile service ordering, and the ability to make restaurant reservations reduce wait times and provide convenience.
The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and man... The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and manage content, whether they are hotel staff or guests.
STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front de... STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front desk lines. The tool facilitates sustainable practices by digitizing traditional paper-based services, aiding hotels in their sustainability goals.
Where hoteliers push back
The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more f... The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more flexibility in design and functionality.
Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrati... Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrations streamline data management and help provide a seamless experience for both staff and guests.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Guestnet and STAY Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Guestnet offers 20 verified integration partners, while STAY Guest App offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAY Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Guestnet: No. STAY Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Guestnet has an HT Score of 96 and STAY has 47. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor